Nirmala Devi, the Pramukh of Panchayat Samiti Riga, challenged a resolution dated 17‑03‑2026 that removed her from office following a no‑confidence motion. She alleged that the requisition for the motion was not personally served as required by Section 44(3) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006, …
Ranju Devi, the elected Pramukh of the Sonbarsa Block Panchayat Samiti, filed a writ petition challenging a requisition and subsequent letters that sought to convene a special meeting to consider a no‑confidence motion against her. She contended that the requisition was not presented to her as …
The petitioner, Smt. Lalita Kumari, the Pramukh of a Panchayat Samiti, challenged a letter dated 06‑03‑2026 issued by the Up‑Pramukh that fixed 16‑03‑2026 for a special meeting to consider a no‑confidence motion against her. She argued that the Up‑Pramukh acted beyond his authority because, under …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar Sinha, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to appoint him as Nyay Mitra under contract at Banpur Panchayat, alleging that the appointment of a private respondent was illegal. The State contended that the appointment of Nyay Mitra is …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The petitioners were candidates for Panchayat/Prakhand Teacher posts under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher Rules (2006, 2008) who were placed on merit lists, later appointed by District Appellate Authorities after vacancies arose in 2012‑2017, but were denied salaries. The State appealed, …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
The Patna High Court heard a batch of Letters Patent Appeals concerning the appointment of over a hundred teachers who had been selected under the Bihar Panchayat Primary Teacher recruitment rules of 2006 and 2008 but were appointed after vacancies arose post‑2012. The appellants argued that the …
Neelam Devi, the Pramukh of Patna Sadar Block Panchayat Samiti, filed a writ petition challenging a requisition and subsequent notice calling for a special meeting to consider a no‑confidence motion against her. She contended that the requisition was not presented as required by Section 44(3)(i) of …
Manoj Prasad, elected Mukhiya in 2021 from an Extremely Backward Class (EBC) seat, was challenged by a private respondent under Section 136(2) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006 for allegedly not belonging to the Dangi (EBC) caste. The State Election Commission referred the caste‑status issue to …
Aditi Kumari, Chairman of Zila Parishad Sitamarhi, challenged a recommendation dated 14‑02‑2026 by the Lok Prahari‑cum‑Divisional Commissioner to remove her under Section 70(5) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006. She filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash the recommendation, mandamus to …
Asarafi Khatoon filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to quash a requisition and a letter issued by the Block Development Officer, alleging that they violated mandatory provisions of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006. The petitioner claimed the requisition was improperly routed and …
The petitioner, Mithlesh Kumar Yadav, filed a writ petition seeking certiorari to quash a No Confidence Motion and mandamus directing authorities to adjudicate the cancellation of a Panchayat Samiti member’s membership under Section 44(4) of the Bihar Panchayat Raj Act, 2006. The petition also …
The petitioner, Sitaram, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 19‑08‑2025 concerning the appointment of a Nyaya Mitra in a Gram Panchayat. He later sought to amend the petition to raise a fresh challenge to the appointment letter. The State contended that the petitioner must first invoke …
Vidya Bharati, the Zila Parishad Adhyaksh of Buxar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Deputy Development Commissioner to produce an order and a certiorari to quash a notice of a special Zila Parishad meeting dated 15‑02‑2024, alleging that the notice violated Sub‑section 4(i) …
Anita Devi and Randhir Kumar, block panchayat officials, challenged a requisition signed by 14 elected members seeking a special meeting to consider a no‑confidence motion against them. They filed an application for certiorari to quash the requisition and a related letter, contending that the …
The petitioner, Vikas Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking his appointment as Nyay Mitra in a Gram Katchahry in Muzaffarpur, Bihar, alleging that his representations to the authorities were ignored. The State contended that the matter is governed by the Bihar Gram Katchahry Nyaya Mitra (Employment, …
The petitioner, Ramesh Manjhi, a Mukhiya of Gram Panchayat Shripur Gahar West, filed a writ petition seeking quash of a recommendation dated 19‑09‑2025 by the Lok Prahari‑cum‑Divisional Commissioner to remove him from office. The State argued that the petition was premature because the Lok Prahari …
Kumar Sidharth filed a public‑interest writ petition alleging massive financial irregularities in the construction of a culvert by the Panchayat President, claiming that payments of over Rs 65 lakhs were made to his relatives without proper administrative approval. The respondents, including various …
Smt. Pratibha Kumari, a teacher, filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking restoration of her liberty to pursue a remedy under Rule 16 of the Bihar State Teaching Institutions Teachers and Employees (Disputes Redress & Appeal) Rules, 2020. She challenged actions taken by the State of …
In a Bihar Panchayat election for the post of Mukhia, the petitioner alleged that his valid votes were being rejected while invalid votes for the returned candidate were accepted. The Election Tribunal, after hearing evidence, ordered a recount and later declared the election of the returned …
We use cookies for analytics to improve your experience. Essential cookies are always on. Privacy Policy.