Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Sanjeet Kumar, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018/22 for the alleged recovery of 82.125 litres of liquor from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, that the liquor was not found in …
The petitioner, Mukesh Sahni, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018-22 for alleged recovery of 82.350 litres of liquor from a seized SUV. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not present at …
Petitioner Punam Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018-22 for alleged possession of 0.555 litre of liquor in a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had a clean antecedent, …
Shantosh Tiwari sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018‑22. He has six prior criminal cases, five under the Excise Act, and is alleged to have been involved in the recovery of large quantities of liquor from a …
The petitioner, Anshu Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018-22 for alleged recovery of 1,656 litres of beer from land adjacent to his house. He asserted a clean criminal record and that no liquor was …
Petitioners Vakil Mushar and Jitendra Mushar sought anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018-22 alleging recovery of six litres of liquor from their joint family house. They argued that no arrest was made at the scene, no …
