Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
Shambhu Shankar Gupta, holder of License No. 41 of 2002 under Section‑8 of the Bihar Saw Mills Regulation Act, 1990, challenged the seizure of a 36‑inch saw mill and 11 pieces of Chah wood by a forest officer, seeking a writ of certiorari to quash the seizure list dated 11‑05‑2023 and a mandamus …
The petitioner, Dharmendra Kumar, was accused of operating an illegal sawmill in violation of Sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and Sections 5, 10, 13 and 14 of the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990. He applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was falsely implicated, that the …
Shivnath Sharma applied for pre‑arrest bail after an FIR was lodged under Sections 41 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 and several provisions of the Bihar Saw Mills (Regulation) Act, 1990, alleging he operated an illegal saw‑mill. The FIR was based on an anonymous complaint and the seizure of a …
Munni Devi, the petitioner, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest‑cum‑Chairman of the State Level Committee for Wood‑Based Industries, Bihar, to dispose of her representation dated 15‑12‑2025. She wants her saw‑mill included in the Final …
Tata Engineering & Locomotive Co. Ltd., a manufacturer of automobiles, purchased large quantities of timber from licensed dealers and operated several saw‑mills within its factories to produce wooden components for its vehicles. The State of Bihar issued a notice requiring the company to obtain a …
