Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bihar State Universities Act, 1976

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

PATNA UNIVERSITY AND ANR.versusDR. (MRS.) AMITA TIWARI

1997 INSC 62327 August 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Amita Tiwari, was appointed on an ad‑hoc basis as a lecturer in Home Science at Patna Women's College despite not possessing the post‑graduate qualification in Home Science required by the university statutes, though she held an M.A. in Sociology, an allied subject. The Chancellor later issued orders di

DR. RAM TAWAKYA SINGHversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS

2013 INSC 54419 August 2013Appeal(s) allowed

The Governor‑cum‑Chancellor of Bihar appointed several Vice‑Chancellors and Pro‑Vice‑Chancellors without adhering to the statutory requirement of meaningful consultation with the State Government under the Bihar State Universities Act and the Patna University Act. Dr. Ram Tawakya Singh, a professor, challenged these ap

BASUDEO TIWARYversusSIDO KANHU UNIVERSITY AND ORS.

1998 INSC 36717 September 1998Appeal(s) allowed

Basudeo Tiwary, a lecturer appointed in 1978 at an affiliated college that later became a constituent unit of Sido Kanhu University, was re‑appointed on a temporary basis in 1986. The Vice‑Chancellor terminated his services, invoking Section 35(3) of the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976, on the ground that his appoin

JAGDISH PRASAD SHARMA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2013 INSC 47517 July 2013Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the University Grants Commission (UGC) could, through regulations under the UGC Act, impose a composite scheme that revised pay scales and raised the retirement age of teachers from 62 to 65 years on State universities and colleges. The petitioners argued that the UGC's recommendation

DR. B.P. YADAV AND ANR.versusDR. RATNESHWAR PRASAD SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 38614 March 1996Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether two members of the Bihar University (Constituent Colleges) Service Commission, Dr. B.P. Yadav and Prof. Suresh Prasad Singh, possessed the statutory qualification of being Professors as required by Section 6 of the Service Commission Act, given that their promotions to Professor were

AMARKANT RAIversusSTATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2015 INSC 21513 March 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Amarkant Rai, was appointed as a night guard on daily wages by the college principal in 1983, a position for which the principal lacked statutory authority under the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976. Although the university later decided to regularise employees who had served for more than a year, the

STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusBIHAR RAJYA M.S.E.S.K.K. MAHASANGH AND ORS.

2004 INSC 59812 October 2004Dismissed

The case concerned the absorption of about 4,000 teaching and non‑teaching employees from 40 colleges that were converted from affiliated to constituent status under the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976. The State of Bihar (and later Jharkhand) challenged a High Court order directing the universities to absorb these

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.versusSYED ASAD RAZA AND ORS.

1997 INSC 3744 April 1997Leave Granted & Dismissed

Maulana Azad College, Ranchi, a minority institution, had entered into a 1972 agreement that no new posts could be created without the Vice‑Chancellor’s prior permission. After the Bihar State Universities Act, 1976 came into force, the college created a post and appointed Syed Asad Raza in 1979. The issue was whether

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search