Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
Madhukar Yadav filed a petition under Section 48(E) of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885 seeking declaration as a Raiyat (Bataidar) over land he had cultivated for over 55 years and to prevent alleged unlawful ejectment by the land holders. The Deputy Commissioner of Land Reforms (D.C.L.R.) rejected his …
Rashmi Singh filed a writ petition challenging an ex parte order dated 10‑01‑2015 and a correction letter dated 26‑03‑2015 issued by the Circle Officer, Forbesganj under Section 48D of the Bihar Tenancy Act, 1885, which allegedly reduced her recorded land without notice or hearing. She also …
The petitioners, a group of descendants claiming raiyati rights over a one‑acre‑plus plot in Barun, Aurangabad, challenged a series of orders that rejected their claim for compensation and initiated title verification proceedings. They alleged that the Deputy Collector, the LRDC and Sub‑Divisional …
The appellants challenged the validity of a gift of a house and its appurtenant land made by the father‑in‑law to the respondent, who was already in possession of the property. The gift was evidenced by an oral declaration and a written deed that had not been registered. The trial court and the High …
Bhaiya Rudra Pratap Deo, holder of the impartible Nagaruntari estate, executed an unregistered maintenance (khorposh) deed in 1952 granting eight villages to his brother’s son, Lalu Maheshanuj. The plaintiff alleged fraud and that the deed was void under Section 12A of the Chota Nagpur Encumbered …
The plaintiff, an intermediary landlord, sued the respondents, tenants‑at‑will, for possession of agricultural land after a notification under Section 3 of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 had vested the plaintiff's estate in the State. The trial court held the plaintiff was in "khas" possession and …
