Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
83 judgments · newest first · showing 1–83
Subash Upadhyay filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging a provisional order dated 14‑08‑2026 in FIR No. 125 of 2024 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, which led to criminal case 65485/2026 pending before the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, …
Uttam Basaur applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 499 of 2025) alleging gang rape of a 14‑year‑old girl under Sections 332(b), 70(2), 351(3) of the BNS Act and Sections 5(g) and 6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, a delayed FIR originally lodged in Madhya Pradesh, …
The applicants, Hasib Salmani and two others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge‑sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings (Case No. 7502 of 2025) arising out of Crime No. 237 of 2024, which involved offences under sections 85, 115(2), …
Anand Yadav, the accused in State v. Anand Yadav (Case No. 156 of 2023), filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Additional District and Sessions Judge/Special Judge (POCSO) at Orai to expedite the trial, which involves charges under Section 377 IPC, …
The applicant, Sandeep Yadav, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Special Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur, to conclude a pending criminal case (Case No. 3480 of 2021) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The case has been pending since …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash an order dated 21‑06‑2022 that had summoned them under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504 and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961. They claimed they were falsely implicated and that the underlying personal …
The applicant, Antriksh Kumar Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Session Case No. 883 of 2022) against Bharat Singh and others, which involved offences under the IPC and the SC/ST Act. The applicant later indicated that the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet and related proceedings, claiming they were falsely implicated and that the parties had amicably resolved their dispute. The State did not object to a compromise being filed in the trial court. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 15‑12‑2024 and the accompanying summons in Criminal Case No.1163 of 2020, which arose from FIR No.562 of 2024 alleging offences under sections 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the BNS Act, 2023. The …
Varun Singh filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act on 17‑12‑2024 against Manish Chaturvedi. A summons was issued on 11‑03‑2025 and the case remains pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Ghazipur. The applicant moved the High Court under Section 529 …
Neeraj Kumar Dubey, an informant, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS Act seeking a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D) FTC CAW, Bhadohi, to expedite the trial of criminal case No. 2249/2015 (crime No. 207/2015) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406, 354, 316 IPC …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 04‑06‑2012 under Section 135 of the Electricity Act and to have the proceedings stayed. Both parties’ counsel appeared, and the applicant expressed willingness to settle the dispute by …
The applicant, Gautam Yadav, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act challenging a charge sheet dated 26‑07‑2023 that alleged offences under Section 420 IPC, the Uttar Pradesh Public Service Commission Act and the Information Technology Act. The applicant’s counsel argued that no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Appeal No. 57/2022 arising from FIR No. 53/2021) and the order dated 05.01.2022 passed by the Judicial Magistrate, Sonbhadra. The applicants contended that no offence was made out against …
The applicants Dwarika and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside an order dated 05‑01‑2022 passed by the Additional Civil Judge/Judicial Magistrate that stayed the criminal proceedings against them. The High Court examined the allegations, which disclosed …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the cognizance order dated 24-04-2025 and to obtain liberty to file a bail application before the trial court. The counsel for the applicants did not contest the merits of the underlying criminal case but requested …
The applicant Arvind Kumar Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking discharge (उन्मोचन) in a criminal case (Criminal Appeal No 226/2025) pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate‑First Class, Mirzapur. The applicant contended that he was innocent and that the order …
The applicants, Avneesh Kumar Yadav and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 909 of 2025, which involved charges under IPC sections 498‑A, 504, 506 and the Dowry Prohibition Act sections 3 and 4. The parties had amicably settled the …
Mudassir filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 12‑12‑2023 and the ensuing criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.378/9 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 313 of the IPC, the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961 and the Muslim …
The applicants, Saurabh Tigoria and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside the cognizance and charge sheet in a special trial under the Electricity Act (Amendment) 2023 and several IPC provisions. They argued that the offence is compoundable and were ready …
Anuradha Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd., represented by Mr. Parth Manoj Jadia, filed a writ petition seeking the partial quashing of FIR No. 0431 of 2025, in which it was named Accused No.4 for alleged cheating and breach of trust. The complainant filed an Affidavit of Consent indicating no …
Smt. Mausam filed an application to cancel the bail of the accused (opposite party no.2) in a criminal case alleging that the accused was pressurising her to compromise and thereby threatening the trial. The application relied on sections of the BNS Act, the SC/ST Act and the POCSO Act, but no …
The applicant, Ramji Gupta, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite two pending Sessions Trials (Nos. 577/2024 and 576/2024) involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 308 and 304 IPC. The State opposed, and the Court …
Yogesh Kumar applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 409 of 2026) involving offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The FIR was lodged three days after the alleged incident. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 BNSS …
The applicant, Hemant Goyal, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a revision order dated 19‑06‑2024 and a summoning order dated 18‑07‑2025 in a criminal case involving IPC offences 323, 324, 325, 504 and 506. He did not press the merits of the quash relief and instead …
The applicant, M/s Tyagi Enterprises, filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a High Court direction that the trial court expedite a pending criminal complaint (Case No. 879 of 2022) under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined whether it could …
The applicant filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a court order directing the trial court to dispose of a pending Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint within a fixed time. The applicant argued that the case, filed on 04‑06‑2025, remained undecided and required a …
The applicant, Vansh Pratap Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order, and proceedings in a criminal case arising from FIR allegations under IPC sections 191(2), 115(2) and 352. The applicant argued that the FIR was based on false …
The applicants, a group of farmers, were implicated in an alleged assault at a sugar mill based on a FIR lodged a day after the incident, despite no injuries, no victim complaint, and no direct evidence linking them to the alleged offences. They filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS …
The applicant, Vaish Khan, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a notice dated 27.05.2026 issued under Section 130 of the BNSS by the City/Executive Magistrate, Mirzapur, in criminal case No.33 of 2026 (State vs. Vaish Khan) under Section 129G of the BNSS. The High …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge sheet and related criminal proceedings involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 23‑09‑2022 that framed charges against them in a criminal case (Case No. 5404 of 2017) involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 406 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Mohammad Fahad, who was arrested at Cheeoki Railway Station for allegedly possessing 477 bottles of codeine‑based cough syrup. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, that the forensic lab report did not confirm the presence of …
Rishabh Sharma filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS challenging a sanction order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muradabad, in a case instituted under Sections 3/25 of the Arms Act and 9(k)/1(k) of the Explosive Substances Act. The applicant alleged that no offence was made out …
The petitioners, Nobroker Technologies Solutions Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking quash of a criminal proceeding arising from a copyright infringement complaint and an FIR registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The dispute involved alleged infringement of copyrighted material, …
The original complainant, Kailashben Arunbhai Prajapati, appealed under Section 378 of the CrPC against the acquittal of the accused by the 5th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vadodara. The High Court examined recent Supreme Court jurisprudence, particularly Celestium Financial Ltd. v. A. …
The applicants, Savita and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case filed under various IPC and CLA provisions. During the hearing, the applicant’s counsel withdrew all prayers except the request to …
Vibhas Chandra filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑02‑2019 and the charge‑sheet in a criminal case (Sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506 IPC) pending before the ACJM‑II, Prayagraj. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, where …
Ram Pravesh applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 517 of 2025) involving offences under Sections 65(1), 87, 137(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6, 5N/6 of the POCSO Act. The victim’s statement recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS indicated that she had travelled with the applicant from …
The applicant, Fahad Mustafa, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act before the Allahabad High Court. The applicant’s counsel, Mohd. Naushad Ahmad Khan, was not present on the scheduled date of 20‑04‑2026, nor on the subsequent date. The State’s counsel, G.A., appeared before the …
The applicants Abdul Sattar and four others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 102078 of 2025) arising from Crime No. 19 of 2025 and a summoning order dated 18.08.2025. They contended that the proceedings were abusive of process …
Amar Singh was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 544 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(2)(m) of the BNS Act and Sections 5L/6 of the POCSO Act. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated and that the victim, an 18‑year‑old, had stated in a Section 183 …
The applicants Parmatma, Gunjeshwar and Krishna filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 12‑10‑2025, the cognizance order dated 27‑10‑2025, and the entire Special Session Trial No. 2258 of 2025 arising under various provisions of the SC/ST Act. The …
The applicants Ram Babu and three others filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the cognizance and charge sheet issued by the Special Judge under the POCSO Act and related provisions of the SC/ST Act, and to stay the ongoing trial. The State filed a …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and summoning order in a criminal case arising from offences under Sections 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act. The …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking quash of a charge sheet and summons in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506, 354 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had amicably settled the dispute by a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a criminal case (Case No. 100076 of 2025) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghaziabad, which involved offences under Sections 498A, 323, 342, 354, 504, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The …
Vijay Kumar filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking a stay of the order dated 02.07.2025 of the Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act concerning a dishonoured cheque. The applicant contended …
The applicants, Smt. Nanki Devi and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 21 February 2026 passed by the Additional District & Sessions Judge (Special Judge, Prevention of Corruption Act) in Kanpur Nagar. The impugned order had allowed a …
The applicant, Ritik Kumar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash an order dated 23 March 2026 passed by the District Magistrate of Mau in Criminal Case No. 2303 of 2025. The impugned order related to offences under the Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act, Animal …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 928 of 2022, which involved charges of dowry harassment and assault under IPC 498‑A, 323, 354 and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The parties had reached a mutual settlement on 25 September 2023, which was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.03.2025 in a complaint case arising from an FIR lodged on 07.07.2022 under IPC sections 323, 427, 504, 506 and SC/ST Act section 3(1)(da). They alleged that the prosecution case was …
The petitioner claimed that an oral agreement to sell a house, for which he paid Rs. 6 lakh, was breached by the respondents who neither executed the sale deed nor returned the money. He filed a complaint under Section 175(3) of the BNSS, which the magistrate dismissed as a civil matter, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings and charge sheets arising from a case under Sections 498A, 323 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, claiming that the parties had settled their dispute by compromise. The State …
Md. Arif, a driver, was arrested in connection with an NDPS case after police seized 160 litres of Wiscorex cough syrup containing codeine. The petitioner argued that the syrup, with codeine concentration below 2.5%, is exempted as a manufactured drug under a 1985 government notification and that no …
Manish Pandey applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 318(4) and 3(5) of the BNSS Act and Section 66(D) of the Information Technology Act, based on nine suspicious transactions dated 06.05.2024. The FIR was lodged nearly two years after the transactions, and …
The applicant, Tinku alias Ram Singh, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Special Case No.27 of 2000, Crime No.52 of 2016) pending before the Special Judge, POCSO Court, Bareilly, which were based on IPC sections 363, 366, 376(2)(n) and …
The applicants, Ravindra Kumar and his son Asmit Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act and Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and proceedings in Criminal Case No. 940 of 2025 arising from FIR 09/2025 under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities …
The petitioner, Sonu Kumar, was arrested as a passenger in a tempo from which 791 litres of Wiscorex and Chefax‑TC cough syrups containing 0.2% codeine were seized, leading to charges under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he neither owned nor drove the …
The applicant, Farman, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 73 of 2025) involving alleged offences under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the BNS Act, Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act, and Section 3(2)(V) of the SC/ST Act. The victim, who is reported to be slightly below the age of …
The applicants, Shivam and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No.41 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 498A, 323, 324, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. They claimed that the dispute had …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash criminal case No. 754 of 2020, which involved charges under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, arising from a matrimonial dispute. The parties had reached a full …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the charge sheet and cognizance order in a criminal case arising from alleged offences under Sections 498-A, 313, 323, 324, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act, on the ground that the parties had reached a …
Petitioners Sattar Ansari and Sufiya Khatoon were arrested in connection with a kidnapping alleged under Sections 96 and 137(2) of the BNS Act and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution alleged that they abducted a 17‑year‑old girl from her home on the night of 18‑19 July 2025, but the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking quash of Criminal Case No. 935 of 2026, which arose from a matrimonial dispute and alleged offences under sections 85, 115(20), 152, 351 of the BNS Act and sections 3/4 of the D.P. Act. The parties had earlier settled the …
The applicant, Om Prakash Rajutiya, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to set aside an order dated 06‑11‑2025 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act), Jhansi, which had rejected his earlier application under Section 173(4) BNSS. The High Court examined whether the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a summoning order dated 18‑01‑2025 issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Budaun, which alleged their involvement in offences under Sections 120‑B, 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC. The dispute arose from a complex …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Sessions Trial No. 396 of 2020) and the non‑bailable warrant (NBW) issued against them. They contended that they were on bail but could not appear in court due to unavoidable …
Smt. Resham Pyari filed a criminal revision challenging an order of the Family Court, Bareilly, relating to an application under Section 144 of the BNSS Act. The High Court had earlier set aside the impugned order dated 10‑Nov‑2025 and remanded the matter for a fresh hearing, directing compliance …
Vikky Kumar was arrested in connection with a case involving alleged forced dancing of two girls in an orchestra, with charges under multiple statutes including the BNS Act, POCSO Act, Juvenile Justice Act, Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act and the Bonded Labour System (Abolition) Act. The …
Somu Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8A(c), 21(c) and 29 of the NDPS Act after police recovered 419.8 grams of brown sugar from beneath the seat of a Swift Dezire car he was travelling in. The petitioner argued that the narcotic was not in his conscious physical …
Bundela Yadav was arrested in connection with Special NDPS Case No. 232 of 2025 for alleged possession of 5.5 kg of green poppy straw, invoking Sections 8(b), 15(b) and 18(b) of the NDPS Act. The petitioner contended that he had no possession of the narcotic, that the seizure was not conducted in …
The petitioner, Rakesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in an excise case involving the alleged recovery of 100.800 litres of liquor from a vehicle he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, that the driver acted without his knowledge, …
The petitioner, Uttam Kumar, was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 21(c) and 22(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act for alleged possession of 7.9 grams of brown sugar. He contended that the seizure was unlawful, that the police failed to comply …
Petitioner Prabhakar Singh was arrested in connection with a case registered under Sections 413, 414 and 34 of the IPC, Sections 8(c), 21(b), 21(c) and 22(c) of the NDPS Act, and Sections 25(1‑b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that a loaded pistol and 50 g of brown sugar were …
The petitioner, Amit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a), 33, 35, 36 and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018, alleging that liquor was recovered from premises not belonging to him and that he was not caught in possession. He …
The petitioner, Vikash Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 59,400 litres of liquor and seizure of a motorcycle from land not owned by him. He argued that nothing was found in his …
The petitioners sought to quash the order dated 25.02.2021 of the Additional Session Judge which had taken cognizance of offences under sections 363, 366A, 376/34 of the IPC and section 4 of the POSCO Act against them in a kidnapping case. The complaint was lodged by Sintu Kumar Pandit alleging that …
The petitioner, Pramila Kumari, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2016, where 750 ml of liquor was recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no prior criminal record, was not …
Munna Yadav applied for anticipatory bail after a FIR was lodged alleging that he recovered 8.64 litres of liquor from a sugarcane field belonging to Khedi Yadav, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested …
The petitioners, Guddu Yadav (20 years old) and Ramkrit Yadav, were charged under sections 126(2), 115(2), 352, 74, 75, 78(2) of the BNSS Act, sections 8 and 12 of the Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, and section 3(i)(r)(s)(2)(va) of the SC/ST Act for allegedly molesting a minor …
The petitioner, Sonu Paswan, was arrested after a police raid on his house recovered a country-made pistol and a live cartridge. He applied for regular bail under Sections 25(1‑b)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, contending that the seized items were not in his possession and that the seizure violated …
The petitioner, Md. Sartaz, sought bail in a case where 4.365 kg of ganja was seized from his residence and he was charged under Sections 8(c) and 20(b)(ii)(B) of the NDPS Act. The prosecution alleged possession of a substantial quantity of narcotics, while the petitioner claimed innocence, alleging …
