Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
9 judgments · newest first · showing 1–9
Petitioner Puna Chaudhary was implicated in a case (Nokha PS Case No.54 of 2026) under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018 for alleged involvement in the seizure of 35 litres of illicit liquor. The FIR alleged the liquor was seized from various parts of the village, …
The petitioner, Md. Jakir Nadaf, was charged under IPC sections 147, 323, 307, 354A, 504 and 506/34 for allegedly assaulting an informant and her family with lathi‑danda with an intention to kill. The petitioner applied for pre‑arrest bail, arguing that the injuries inflicted were simple in nature. …
The petitioners, Golu Kumar and Golu Kumar (also known as Raushan), were charged under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for possession of 19.98 litres of foreign liquor seized by police. They applied for pre‑arrest bail, claiming innocence, while the State opposed the relief. …
Petitioners Lalu Yadav and Bittu Kumar applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Khaira P.S. Case No.461 of 2025) alleging assault with a sword, iron rod and other weapons over a land dispute, invoking multiple sections of the BNS. They argued that they are co‑sharers of the disputed land and that …
The petitioner, Indal Kumar, was arrested in connection with a kidnapping case (PS case No.70/2024) alleged under Sections 366A and 34 of the IPC and Sections 8 and 14 of the POCSO Act. He claimed that the alleged victim was his consensual partner, that they had married according to Hindu customs …
Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with a case alleging a common intention to kill an informant and his family by assault with an iron rod, invoking several serious offences under the BNS. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that any injuries caused were in self‑defence and that he has a …
The petitioners, Sushila Devi and Maksudan Mahto, were charged in Gopalpur Police Station Case No.183 of 2025 for offences under Sections 103(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleged to have assaulted the husband of an informant who later died en route to the hospital. The petitioners applied for pre‑arrest …
The petitioners, Chandramauli Yadav and his son Satish Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case (Pandarak PS Case No.190 of 2025) alleging offences under several sections of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR alleged that a group of 19 accused, including the petitioners, fired at an …
The petitioner, Umesh Sahni, was implicated in a murder case (PS Case No.537 of 2024) alleged to involve dowry demands and the killing of the informant's daughter. He applied for pre‑arrest bail, asserting that he has no relationship with the deceased's family and that the accusation arose from a …
