Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusSWANSTONE MULTIPLEX CINEMA (P) LTD

2009 INSC 94827 July 2009Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra appealed a High Court order that quashed demand notices issued to Swanstone Multiplex Cinema Ltd. for entertainment duty collected during a period of statutory exemption. The multiplex had collected the full 45% duty from patrons even though the Act provided a three‑year full exemption and a tw

SHANKAR VIDEO AND ANR.versusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 23514 July 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants operated a video cinema using an ENTEL video projector system that displayed pre‑recorded movies from VCR/VCP on a large separate screen. They obtained licences under the Maharashtra Cinemas (Regulation) Rules, 1966 (as amended) but a touring cinema licence‑holder challenged the validity of those licence

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, KOLHAPURversusMIS. CHAPHALKAR BROTHERS PUNE

2017 INSC 11987 December 2017Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra introduced a subsidy scheme for multiplex theatre complexes by amending the Bombay Entertainment Duty Act, 1923, granting a three‑year exemption from entertainment duty followed by a two‑year partial remission. The Commissioner of Income Tax assessed the subsidy received by Mis. Chaphalkar Brot

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search