Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The petitioner, Kirit Enterprises Refrigeration Pvt. Ltd., filed an interim application seeking recall of the High Court's order dated 08.10.2025 which had disposed of several civil applications, notably CA/2777/2004, without considering the petitioner's amendment and exhibit requests. The …
The applicant filed an interim application seeking to add the legal heirs of Respondent No. 6, who died on 25‑02‑2025 during the pendency of appeal No. 765 of 2017. A death certificate was annexed to the application. The Registrar noted that the application was filed within the prescribed limitation …
The petitioners, Kiran Rambhau Suryawanshi and Dr. Amar Bharatrao Deshmukh, filed writ petitions seeking the execution of orders passed by the University Grievances Committee. The University Management subsequently challenged those orders before a learned Single Judge, invoking Chapter XVII, Rule …
In the Bombay High Court, two single judges issued contradictory orders on the same set of facts concerning the framing of a charge under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code. The first judge upheld the charge, while the second judge directed that the charge should not be framed, creating a …
The Supreme Court examined an appeal filed by tenants challenging a Bombay High Court order that dismissed their writ petition under Article 226. The petition sought a writ of certiorari against the landlord’s eviction suit, a pure civil dispute between private parties. The Court held that writ …
Shahu Shikshan Prasarak Mandal & Anr. filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order of an industrial tribunal, alleging arbitrariness, unreasonableness and perversity. The Bombay High Court Single Judge dismissed the petition as non‑maintainable, and the Division …
