Bombay Inferior Village Watans Abolition Act, 1958

SUMANBAI BANSHI PAIKDE AND OTHERSversusRAJARAM KONDIRAM GAIKWAD AND OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the 2004 order of the Deputy Collector and its 2005 endorsement by the Divisional Commissioner that mutated the names of the respondents into the ownership column of a 7/12 extract for Survey No. 67, a Mahar Hadola service Inam land protected under the Bombay Inferior …

AASHA MADHUKAR BHUJANGE AND OTHERSversusRAJARAM KONDIBA GAIKWAD AND ORS

The petitioners challenged the 2004 order of the Deputy Collector and its 2005 endorsement by the Divisional Commissioner that mutated the names of the respondents into the ownership column of a 7/12 extract for Survey No. 67, a Mahar Hadola service Inam land protected under the Bombay Inferior …

SHEETAL BABAN BHUJANGEversusRAJARAM KONDIRAM GAIKWAD AND OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the 2004 order of the Deputy Collector and its 2005 endorsement by the Divisional Commissioner that mutated the names of the respondents into the ownership column of a 7/12 extract for Survey No. 67, a Mahar Hadola service Inam land. They argued that the land is a …

RAJARAM KONDIRAM GAIKWAD AND OTHERSversusBHIKA RAJARAM PAIKADE AND OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the 2004 order of the Deputy Collector and its 2005 endorsement by the Divisional Commissioner that mutated the names of the respondents as owners of one‑third shares in a Mahar Hadola service Inam land (Survey No. 67, Village Harsool). They argued that the land is a …

PANDHARINATH NARAYAN MOKALE AND OTHERSversusBHIKA RAJARAM PAIKADE DIED THR LRS LAXMAN AND OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the 2004 order of the Deputy Collector and its 2005 endorsement by the Divisional Commissioner that mutated the names of the respondents into the ownership column of a 7/12 extract for Survey No. 67, a Mahar Hadola service‑Inam land. They argued that the land is a …

BHIKA RAJARAM PAIKADE DIED LRS LAXMAN DIED SHANTABAI AND OTHERSversusPANDHARINATH NARAYAN MOKALE AND OTHERS

The petitioners challenged the 2004 order of the Deputy Collector and its 2005 endorsement by the Divisional Commissioner that mutated the names of the respondents into the ownership column of a 7/12 extract for Survey No. 67, a Mahar Hadola service Inam land protected under the Bombay Inferior …

SHRI. SURYAKANT RAVJI SHAH AND ANRversusSHRI. GAUTAM RAMCHANDRA DESAI AND ORS

The petitioners sought relief against the Minister’s orders cancelling mutation entries and setting aside a sale of Mahar Watan land that had been transferred without the Collector’s prior sanction. The dispute centered on whether the 2002 amendment inserting Section 5(4) into the Bombay Inferior …

CHANDRAMOHAN RAMCHANDRA PATIL AND ORS.versusBAPU KOYAPPA PATIL (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.