Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Money Lenders Act, 1946

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SONA CHANDI OAL COMMITTEE AND ORS.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2004 INSC 71916 December 2004Dismissed

The appellants, licensed money lenders, challenged the inspection fee levied under Section 9‑A of the Bombay Money‑Lenders Act, 1946 for renewal of their licences, contending that it was a tax in disguise, excessive and violative of Article 14. The State argued that the fee was a regulatory charge necessary for inspect

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.versusSARANGDHAR SINGH SHIVDAS SINGH CHAVAN AND ANR.

2010 INSC 87714 December 2010Dismissed

The State of Maharashtra appealed against a Bombay High Court order that quashed a Collector’s directive, issued on the instructions of the Chief Minister, which required police to obtain clearance from a District Anti‑Money Lending Committee and a legal opinion before registering any FIR against Gokulchand Sananda and

DAMODHAR NARAYAN SAWALE (D) THROUGH LRSversusSHRI TEJRAO BAJIRAO MHASKE & ORS

2023 INSC 4914 May 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant sought possession of a 3‑acre agricultural field based on a registered sale deed dated 21‑04‑1979. The defendants argued that the deed was a sham, executed as collateral for a money‑lending transaction, and that the sale violated the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Ac

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search