Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Police Act

33 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusSHANKAR GANAPATI RAHATOL & ORS.

2019 INSC 11931 January 2019Disposed off

In 1998 a complaint was lodged alleging that a group of accused assaulted the complainant, leading to charges under Sections 143, 147, 323 r/w 149, 325 IPC and Section 135 of the Bombay Police Act. The trial court acquitted all accused, and the State of Maharashtra applied for leave to appeal under Section 378(3) of th

IDRISH BHAI DAUDBHAIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2005 INSC 5631 January 2005Appeal(s) allowed

Idrish Daudbhai (appellant) was convicted under IPC sections 302 and 34 for allegedly sharing a common intention with three co‑accused to murder Siddique Ahmed Patel and to cause hurt to Yusuf Adam Patel. The prosecution's case rested on the testimony of three eye‑witnesses and the FIR, alleging that the appellant stru

LATESH @ DADU BABURAO KARLEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

2018 INSC 7030 January 2018Disposed off

On December 10, 2006, six accused assaulted Vitthal Hingane and his brother Jagdish, resulting in Jagdish's death. The trial court and High Court convicted all six under sections 302 and 307 IPC, among other charges. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the prosecution proved the guilt of each accused beyond r

DILPESH BALCHANDRA PANCHALversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 25329 April 2010Dismissed

The appellant, Dilpesh Balchandra Panchal, was convicted along with two co‑accused for the murder of Indrasinh under IPC s.302 and s.114. The prosecution relied on the testimony of the victim's parents, who witnessed the attack, medical evidence indicating two fatal knife wounds, and the recovery of the murder weapon f

GOBARBHAI NARANBHAI SINGALAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2008 INSC 11229 January 2008Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined two murder cases in which the accused, Jayrajsinh Temubha Jadeja, had been granted regular bail by the Gujarat High Court on the grounds of prolonged judicial custody, non‑commencement of trial and prior compliance with temporary bail conditions. The State of Gujarat contended that the High C

AMANULLA KHAN KUDEATALLA KHAN PATHANversusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

1999 INSC 26728 June 1999Dismissed

The appellant, Amanulla Khan, a member of a notorious gang, was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 as a "dangerous person" after allegedly extorting money by threatening death and assaulting victims on three separate occasions. He challenged the detention, arguing that a single cr

KALABHAI HAMIRBHAI KACHHOTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2021 INSC 27428 April 2021Dismissed

The appellants, three villagers, were convicted for the murder of Gokalbhai and the assault of two others after a quarrel over rent and animosity. The prosecution presented 32 witnesses, medical and post‑mortem reports, serological evidence and the testimony of injured witnesses who identified the accused. The defence

ABDUL RAZAK NANNEKHAN PATHANversusPOLICE COMMISSIONER, AHMEDABAD & ANR.

1989 INSC 21327 July 1989Case Allowed

Abdul Razak challenged a detention order issued under Section 3(1) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985, claiming the grounds were vague, irrelevant and violated Article 22(5) of the Constitution. The petitioner's grounds listed seven criminal cases and alleged use of deadly weapons, but the Co

BHARATKUMAR RAMESHCHANDRA BAROTversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2018 INSC 26326 March 2018Dismissed

The appellant was convicted of murder under Section 302 IPC and sentenced by the Sessions Court to ten years' rigorous imprisonment, which the State appealed under Section 377 of the CrPC for enhancement. The High Court, after serving notice and appointing an amicus curiae, enhanced the sentence to life imprisonment. T

PAVAN VASUDEO SHARMAversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY

2019 INSC 39625 March 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Pavan Vasudeo Sharma, was arrested during a raid on a kidnapping case and a 9 mm service pistol, live cartridges and two mobile phones were seized from him. The prosecution alleged that the pistol, originally belonging to a police Naik, was used to murder Bhima Waghmare and that the seized mobile phone w

ISHVARBHAI FULJIBHAI PATNIversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 54724 November 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Ishvarbhai Fuljibhai Patni was convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. He appealed to the Gujarat High Court, which dismissed his appeal in a brief, cryptic judgment that merely affirmed the conviction without discussing the evidence or the arguments raised. The Supreme Court held that a Hig

ABDUL VAHAB ABDUL MAJID SHAIKH AND ORS.versusSTA TE OF GUJARAT

2007 INSC 45924 April 2007Dismissed

The case concerned the abduction of businessman Jayendra Mahendra Tripathi in January 1994, for which a ransom was demanded. A co‑accused, A‑9, gave a detailed confession to the police under Section 15 of the TADA Act, which was later retracted. The Supreme Court held that the confession was recorded in compliance with

SH. MUSTAKMIYA JABBARMIYA SHAIKHversusSH. M.M. MEHTA, COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND ORS.

1995 INSC 20723 March 1995Case Allowed

The petitioner was detained under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-Social Activities Act, 1985 on the basis of several isolated incidents, including a 1993 shooting, alleged harbouring of an offender, assaults on a businessman and a witness, and possession of an unlicensed revolver. He challenged the detention order, arg

BHAGIRATH SINGH S/O MAHIPAT SINGH JUDEJAversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1983 INSC 17821 November 1983Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant was charged under Section 307 IPC for stabbing a victim and was granted bail by the Sessions Judge. The State appealed, and the Gujarat High Court cancelled the bail, citing the victim's status as a social and political worker and the seriousness of the offence. The Supreme Court held that cancellation of

PATHUBHA GOVINDJI RATHOD & ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2015 INSC 6521 January 2015Appeal(s) allowed

In a village in Gujarat, two rival groups clashed, resulting in a free fight in which appellant No.1 Pathubha Govindji Rathod was stabbed with a knife and subsequently fired a revolver, killing Natha Nagabhai. Both appellant No.1 and appellant No.2 Hemubha Govindji were convicted under Section 302/304 read with Section

RAMESHBHAI MOHANBHAI KOLI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT

2010 INSC 71120 October 2010Dismissed

The appellants were accused of murdering the chairman of a bank, with the prosecution alleging that they were hired by co‑accused to carry out the attack. The trial court convicted the appellants based on a chain of circumstantial evidence, including a blood‑stained loan application, knives recovered at the appellants'

AHMEDHUSSAIN SHAIKHHUSSAIN © AHMED KALIOversusCOMMISSIONER OF POLICE, AHMEDABAD & ANR.

1989 INSC 28419 September 1989Case Allowed

The petitioner, Ahmedhussain Shaikh, was detained under section 3(2) of the Gujarat Prevention of Anti‑Social Activities Act, 1985 on grounds that he was a bootlegger who created fear and terror in his locality and might resume such activities if released on bail. The detaining authority relied on the possibility of hi

MOHMED SALEEMLIAS CHUHO MOHMED SHAKOORversusSTATE OF GUJARAT

1994 INSC 27019 July 1994Disposed off

The appellant, Mohammed Saleem, was tried for assault with a knife that caused injuries to the complainant, and was charged under IPC Section 324, TADA Section 3(1), and the Bombay Police Act Section 135(1). The trial court acquitted him of the Bombay Police Act charge, but convicted him under IPC 324 and TADA 3(1). On

SHAILESH JASVANTBHAI AND ANR.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT AND ORS.

2006 INSC 3519 January 2006Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined the sentencing of two accused, Pratapji and Jayantubha, who had assaulted Sameer Kumar and Shailesh Jasvantbhai with knives on 30 March 2002, resulting in serious injuries. The trial court convicted them under IPC sections 307, 324, 504 read with 114 and sentenced each to ten years' rigorous

HARGOVANDAS DEVRAJBHAI PATEL AND ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

1997 INSC 73318 November 1997Appeal(s) allowed

Police officers were accused of murdering a man identified as Kantuji Mohan Singh after beating him during interrogation at a police station. The prosecution relied on circumstantial evidence, including the discovery of a decomposed body in a jungle and identification of the body by relatives based on clothing and arti

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusCHANDRAPRAKASH KEWAL CHAND JAIN

1990 INSC 1418 January 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a Sub‑Inspector of police, was convicted of raping a 19‑year‑old woman, Shamimbanu, by the trial court. The High Court acquitted him, holding that the victim’s testimony required corroboration in material particulars and that medical evidence was inconsistent. The State appealed. The Supreme Court held

EBHA ARJUN JADEJA & ORS.versusTHE STATE OF GUJARAT

2019 INSC 114816 October 2019Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants were stopped by police in Gujarat and found in possession of prohibited firearms, leading to an FIR under the Arms Act and a concurrent charge under the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, 1987 (TADA). The prosecution sought to add a TADA offence after obtaining sanction from the Distri

VINUBHAI RANCHHODBHAI PATELversusRAJIVBHAI DUDABHAI PATEL & OTHERS

2018 INSC 52116 May 2018Disposed off

The case concerned an attack in which three persons were killed and five injured, allegedly committed by a group of seventeen accused. The Sessions Court convicted four accused and acquitted the rest, but the charges were found to be improperly framed under CrPC sections 211‑213, lacking specific allegations for each d

OLGA TELLIS & ORS.versusBOMBAY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ORS. ETC.

1985 INSC 15110 July 1985Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by pavement and slum dwellers challenging the Bombay Municipal Corporation's demolition of their hutments, arguing that eviction violated their fundamental rights under Articles 21 and 19 of the Constitution. The petitioners claimed that the right to life includes the rig

NAMAD HASSAN BHAGAD AND ORS.versusSTATE OFGUJARAT AND ORS.

1996 INSC 6619 May 1996Disposed off

During a TADA investigation, the police attached seven ships under Section 7A of the Terrorist and Disruptive Activities (Prevention) Act, alleging the vessels were purchased with proceeds of terrorist activity. The owners challenged the attachment, arguing that the ships were bought before the Act came into force and

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANRversusSALEM HASAN KHAN

1989 INSC 849 March 1989Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra issued an externment order against Salem Hasan Khan under Section 56 of the Bombay Police Act, alleging involvement in narcotics, riots and intimidation. Khan appealed the order under Section 60 and, while the appeal was pending, filed a writ petition under Article 226. The State Government dis

P.P. UNIKRISHNAN AND ANR.versusPUTTIYOTTIL ALIKUTTY AND ANR.

2000 INSC 4335 September 2000Dismissed

The petitioners, a Sub‑Inspector and a Constable of the Kerala Police, were charged with offences of assault, grievous hurt, attempt to murder and criminal intimidation under the IPC for illegally confining and beating a shop‑keeper in a police lock‑up. They argued that the trial court should not have taken cognizance

LT. GOVERNOR, NCT AND ORS .versusVED PRAKASH @ VEDU

2006 INSC 2985 May 2006Appeal(s) allowed

The Lt. Governor of the NCT and other officials initiated externment proceedings against Ved Prakash @ Vedu under Section 47 of the Delhi Police Act, 1978, alleging that his movements caused alarm and danger and that witnesses were unwilling to testify due to fear. An order directing his removal from Delhi for two year

NOORUL HUDA MAQBOOL AHMEDversusRAM DEO TYAGI & ORS.

2011 INSC 4384 July 2011Dismissed

During the 1993 Mumbai communal riots, miscreants fired from the rooftop of Suleman Bakery at a police picket. The Joint Commissioner of Police, R.D. Tyagi, led a Special Operations Squad (SOS) that broke open the bakery’s door after the occupants refused to open it, resulting in 12 injuries and eight deaths. An FIR wa

STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusVISHWANATH TUKARAM UMALE & ORS.

1979 INSC 1392 August 1979Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Vishwanath Tukaram Umale and others for stealing railway tyres and tubes from a wagon in transit. The prosecution alleged that accused 1, 2, 5 and an absconding accused had removed the tyres, sold them to accused 3, who later sold some to accused 4. The trial magistrate refused to fr

RAJENDRA PRABHU CHIKANE AND ANR ETCversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA ETC.

2007 INSC 5061 May 2007Dismissed

The deceased Sukhdeo Chikane was attacked and fatally injured with a iron instrument called a "sattur" by three accused brothers amid a long‑standing boundary dispute. The FIR named all three assailants and eyewitnesses (Vikram and Avinash Chikane) identified them as the perpetrators. Medical post‑mortem showed multipl

NAJABHAI DESURBHAI WAGHversusVALERABHAI DEGANBHAI VAGH & ORS.

2017 INSC 911 February 2017Case Partly allowed

The incident occurred on 24 March 1998 when fourteen accused, armed with axes, iron pipes and spears, attacked the complainant Najabhai Desurbhai Wagh near his house after he rebuked them for damaging an electric pole. The assault resulted in the death of the complainant's brother, Unadbhai Desurbhai. The trial court c

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search