Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The petitioners purchased portions of land in Wanjarkheda, Latur, which had been allotted under a consolidation scheme finalized in 1974 under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. In 2012, a co‑sharer (Respondent No. 3) sought correction of the revenue …
The petitioners challenged a 2014 order by the State Minister (Revenue) that allowed a revision of a land consolidation scheme in Wanjarkheda village, Latur district, originally finalized in 1974 under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The scheme had …
The petitioners challenged a 2014 order by the State Minister (Revenue) that allowed a revision of a consolidation scheme for land in Wanjarkheda, Latur, originally finalized in 1974 under the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The scheme had been consented …
The petitioners, members of the Jagdale family, challenged an order dated 12 August 2014 by the Deputy Director of Land Records that allowed variation of a consolidation scheme for village Takali (Dhoki) under Section 31A of the Bombay Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, …
The appellant, a landlord who was a minor when he applied under Section 31(1) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 for possession of land for personal cultivation, had his application dismissed, making the tenant a deemed purchaser. Subsequent proceedings under Section 32‑G to …
