Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
5 judgments · newest first · showing 1–5
The petitioner, Niphad Wines, challenged the Commissioner of State Excise's order suspending its liquor licence for three months and directing a report, alleging the Commissioner lacked authority and that no show‑cause notice was issued. The respondent argued that the petitioner could appeal to the …
The applicants, Kuldeep @ Kano Jagubhai Hudadi and another, were arrested in connection with a raid under the Bombay Prohibition Act (Sections 65A, 65E, 81) and filed a regular bail application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 before a chargesheet was filed. They …
Sh. Bileshwarkhan Udyog Khedut Sahakari Mandali Ltd. challenged a levy imposed by the Gujarat Government under Section 58A of the Bombay Prohibition Act, which required licensees to pay the cost of excise staff for supervising the manufacture of industrial alcohol. The High Court upheld the levy as …
The respondent, an Inspector of Police, was accused of demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs.2000 from a complainant (Rege) to suppress a case under the Bombay Prohibition Act. The prosecution proved the transaction through eyewitnesses, an ultraviolet powder test on the money and the accused's …
The State of Maharashtra prosecuted Sk. Bannu, Shankar and Mohammad Nazir for forging a bail bond and affidavit in a bail application filed under the Bombay Prohibition Act. The first magistrate who granted bail later transferred the case to another magistrate, who, after discovering the forgery, …
