Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Rent Control Act

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SMT. NIRMALA R. BAFNA/KERSHI SHIVAX CAMBATTA AND ORS.versusKHANDESH SPINNING AND WEAVING MILLS CO. LTD. AND ANR./OFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR AND ORS.

1992 INSC 5725 February 1992Disposed off

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from a dispute over a flat leased by Khandesh Spinning and Weaving Mills Ltd., which had gone into liquidation. The appellant, Smt. Nirmala R. Bafna, claimed a sub‑tenancy created in 1979 with the landlord’s oral consent and sought protection under the Bombay Rent Contro

DR. THAKAR SINGHversusSH. MULA SINGH (D) THR. LR. & ORS.

2014 INSC 71414 October 2014Disposed off

Dr. Thakar Singh and others mortgaged several shops in Moga to Suba Singh and Saudagar Singh in 1942, later redeeming the mortgage in 1969. The mortgagees, however, retained possession and leased the premises to several tenants. The mortgagors sued for possession, and the lower court held the suit barred under the Rent

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF GREATER BOMBAYversusNEW STANDARD ENGINEERING CO. LTD.

1990 INSC 3807 December 1990Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay challenged the assessment of rateable value of a housing building constructed by New Standard Engineering Co. Ltd. under a Government subsidised scheme for industrial workers. The corporation had fixed the rateable value under Section 154(1) of the Bombay Municipal Corporatio

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search