Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

S.J. PANDEversusP.K. BALAKRISHNAN

1993 INSC 17329 April 1993Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord determined the contractual tenancy of his tenant in 1966 and later the tenant, now a statutory tenant, granted a licence to the respondent in 1972. The respondent claimed protection from eviction under Section 15A of the Bombay Rent Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The Supreme Court examine

JABAL C. LASHKARI & ORS.versusOFFICIAL LIQUIDATOR & ORS.

2016 INSC 28029 March 2016Disposed off

The appellants, heirs of Durgaprasad Lashkari, sought to prevent the Official Liquidator from selling a 199‑year leasehold property of Prasad Mills Ltd., which was under winding‑up. The High Court held that the landlord could not evict on the ground of non‑payment of rent because the secured creditors were ready and wi

ANIRUDHA RAMAKRISHNA KARLEKARversusSMT. JANKIBAI R. BEDEKAR

1991 INSC 1829 January 1991Dismissed

The landlord sought eviction of a shop tenant under Section 13(1)(c) of the Bombay Rent, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947, alleging that the tenant had been convicted of using the premises for illegal purposes. The tenant, who ran a sweet‑meats and farsan shop, had three convictions under the Prevention

INDIA AUTOMOBILES (1960) LTD.versusCALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.

2002 INSC 7613 February 2002Disposed off

India Automobiles (1960) Ltd., the owner of a nine‑storey commercial building, leased the premises to a tenant who sub‑let parts of it. The Calcutta Municipal Corporation fixed the annual value of the property under Section 174 of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, by taking into account the rent paid by the

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search