Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SHABINAABRAHAM & ORS.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS

2015 INSC 52829 July 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a show‑cause notice issued under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 for alleged short levy of excise duty by a sole proprietor who died in 1989. The legal heirs challenged the notice, arguing that the Act contains no provision to continue assessment against a dead person’s estate. The Supreme Cou

PRADIP NANJEE GALAversusSALES TAX OFFICER & ORS.

2015 INSC 36829 April 2015Dismissed

The appellant, a partner in a firm assessed under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, claimed that a settlement with the State Minister for Finance had discharged his individual liability for the firm’s tax dues, and that the Commissioner had acted on this settlement. The Revenue contested the existence and effect of such

DELTA DISTILLERIES LIMITEDversusUNITED SPIRITS LIMITED & ANR.

2013 INSC 64923 September 2013Dismissed

Delta Distilleries supplied Indian Made Foreign Liquor to United Spirits under a contract that made the buyer responsible for sales tax. A dispute arose over a set‑off/refund claimed by Delta from the Sales Tax Department, which United Spirits argued reduced its tax burden. The arbitral tribunal allowed United Spirits

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ORS.versusPRISM CEMENT LIMITED & ANR

2025 INSC 19912 February 2025Dismissed

Prism Cement Ltd., a unit that had been granted an absolute tax exemption under the Package Scheme of Incentives 1993 (PSI 1993) through an Eligibility Certificate (20‑02‑1998) and an Entitlement Certificate (24‑03‑1998), challenged the Maharashtra State's attempt to withdraw that benefit after the Finance Act, 2002 am

EUROTEX INDUSTRIES AND EXPORTS LIMITED & ANR.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR.

2017 INSC 12858 May 2017Dismissed

The appellants, industrial units that had invested in backward areas of Maharashtra, claimed that a 2009 amendment to the Maharashtra Value Added Tax (MVAT) Act retrospectively altered Section 93, limiting their VAT exemption to a proportion of turnover, thereby violating Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution. T

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search