Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3
The plaintiff, the late Thakore Jagdevsinhji, claimed ownership of land in Kothiakhad village (survey No.247) as private property under a 1948 merger agreement when his princely state merged with India. The State of Gujarat contended that the land vested in the State under Section 6 of the Bombay …
The Supreme Court considered an appeal by tenants of lands in a Taluqdari estate who argued that the lands, though cultivable, should not be deemed “uncultivated” under the Bombay Taluqdari Tenure Abolition Act, 1949 because they had been cultivated earlier. Section 6 of the Act, with its …
The case concerned vast hilly tracts of land that produced natural grass and were formerly part of taluqdar and inamdar estates. After the Bombay Taluqdari Tenure Abolition Act, 1949 and the Bombay Personal Inams Abolition Act, 1952 came into force, the State of Gujarat claimed that these lands were …
