Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petitioners, Lalita Ramesh Lase and others, claimed to be protected tenants of certain agricultural plots under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, invoking Section 70(B) and seeking declaration of status dating back to the Tiller's Day of 1 April 1957. Their applications, …
The appellant purchased an undivided interest in a 106‑acre parcel where the respondent was the tenant in actual possession. A revenue forum initially held both parties to be tenants in common, but a later appellate order declared the appellant not to be a tenant, making the respondent the sole …
The appellant, a landlady, sought determination of reasonable rent under Section 43-B of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948, alleging that the contractual rent was inadequate. The respondents, tenants, contended that they became absolute owners of the land on the tiller's day (1 …
The appellant, the son of a temple priest, cultivated three agricultural plots belonging to the respondent landlord and received the entire crop as payment for his services as pujari and caretaker of dharamshalas. The landlord sued for possession, and the lower authorities initially held the …
