Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
11 judgments · newest first · showing 1–11
The petitioner, Jumma Masjid Panvel, challenged an order of the Additional Tahsildar and Agricultural Lands Tribunal (ALT) that deferred a question on the applicability of Section 32G of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (MT&AL Act) to the final hearing of a tenancy case. The …
The 1986 development plan for Pune earmarked a privately‑owned 1.5‑acre Plot No.438 as a garden, but the Municipal Corporation and the State Government never acquired the land. After the owners (appellants) bought the plot, the Government de‑reserved it by notification on 12‑Feb‑1993, citing lack of …
The plaintiff entered into an agreement with the original defendant to develop dwelling units for weaker sections under Section 21 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, but possession of the land was never transferred and the agreement contained a clause allowing unilateral …
The Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation submitted a revised development plan under the Bombay Town Planning Act in January 1976. The Gujarat Town Planning and Urban Development Act, 1976 came into force on 30 January 1978, repealing the Bombay Act and establishing the Ahmedabad Urban Development …
Arvind Mills Ltd., a textile mill, paid betterment charges under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 as part of a town‑planning scheme and claimed a deduction under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arguing that the payment was a revenue expense. The Income Tax Officer disallowed the deduction; …
The appellant, originally a tracer in the Bombay Municipal Corporation, was deputed to the Town Planning Establishment where he was promoted to junior draftsman and later considered for a higher post. After suspension and removal proceedings, the Industrial Court vacated his removal and he was …
The Gujarat government issued a notification under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire lands for municipal employee housing. After the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (ULCRA) came into force, the landowners filed statements under ULCRA claiming the lands were in excess of the …
The appellant, Prakash Amichand Shah, owned a leasehold interest in land in Surat and challenged the reservation of a portion of his land under Town Planning Scheme No. VIII (Umarwada) prepared under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954. He claimed the scheme violated Articles 14, 19(1)(f) and 31 of …
The State of Gujarat issued notices under section 54 of the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954 and Rule 27 of the Bombay Town Planning Rules, 1955 demanding that lands occupied by Babubhai & Co. be handed over to the Municipal Corporation of Ahmedabad, as the lands had vested in the corporation under …
Swastik Rubber Products Ltd. and others sought exemption from octroi duty on raw materials under the Municipal Corporation of Poona's rule 5(8) of the 1962 Octroi Rules, which required that the industrial concern be situated in an area demarcated as an "industrial estate or area" by the corporation. …
The Surat Municipal Corporation declared its intention to make a town planning scheme under the Bombay Town Planning Act, 1954, which included land leased by Prakash Amichand Shah. The Town Planning Officer awarded compensation for the loss of Shah's lease, which Shah contested as inadequate and …
