Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6
The three oil companies (Bharat Petroleum, Indian Oil and Hindustan Petroleum) held long‑term leases on land, constructed petrol pumps and then sub‑let the premises to dealers. The landlords filed ejectment suits and the companies sought orders under Section 9 of the Madras City Tenants’ Protection …
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (the appellant) occupied land under a 1955 lease that granted a unilateral right to renew for another 25 years. After the Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act, 1976 came into force, the appellant gave notice of renewal in October 1979 but no fresh …
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a government company, claimed a statutory right to renew a lease originally granted to Burmah Shell under the Burmah Shell (Acquisition of Undertakings in India) Act, 1976. The lease, with a nominal rent of Rs 50 per month, had expired in 1985 and the company …
Bharat Petroleum Ltd occupied a premises under a lease that expired in 1978 and sought an extension, which the landlord refused. The landlord filed a writ petition for eviction, which the High Court allowed on the basis of Hindustan Petroleum v. Dolly Das, ignoring the tenant's rights under the …
The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (Determination of Conditions of Service of Employees) Act, 1988 and the schemes framed under it in 1989 and 1996. The appellant union argued that Section 3 of the Act gave the Central Government unguided …
The erstwhile Burmah Shell management staff pensioners filed a writ petition under Article 32 seeking escalation of their pensions, arguing that the rupee's loss of value and rising cost of living warranted a hike comparable to that granted by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation, a sister concern. The …
