CALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusSRI ANIL RATAN BANERJEE AND ORS.
1994 INSC 49226 October 1994Appeal(s) allowed
The respondents obtained an eight‑storey building sanction on 27 April 1985 under the Bengal Municipal Act, 1932, but failed to commence construction within two years, causing the sanction to lapse. They later applied for a revised eight‑storey plan and a twelve‑storey plan in 1987, claiming a deemed sanction under Sec…
INDIA AUTOMOBILES (1960) LTD.versusCALCUTTA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ANR.
2002 INSC 7613 February 2002Disposed off
India Automobiles (1960) Ltd., the owner of a nine‑storey commercial building, leased the premises to a tenant who sub‑let parts of it. The Calcutta Municipal Corporation fixed the annual value of the property under Section 174 of the Calcutta Municipal Corporation Act, 1980, by taking into account the rent paid by the…
M/S. KEWAL COURT PVT. LTD. AND ANRversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
2023 INSC 8849 October 2023Matter referred to larger bench
The Supreme Court examined the meaning of “vacant land” under Section 2(q) of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, focusing on sub‑clause (i) and the conflict between the earlier Johnson two‑judge decision and the later Billimoria three‑judge decision. The appellants argued that land on which construction…