Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

NEMAI CHANDRA KUMAR (D) THR. LRS. & ORSversusMANI SQUARE LTD. & ORS

2022 INSC 75627 July 2022Dismissed

The appellants leased a property in Calcutta for 20 years from 1973 to 1993 and erected pucca structures on it. After the lease expired, they applied to the Thika Tenancy Controller claiming status as thika tenants under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949, the 1981 Act and the 2001 Act, seeking land vesting in the St

NEMAI CHANDRA KUMAR & ORS.versusMANI SQUARE LTD. & ORS.

2015 INSC 15324 February 2015Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, lessees of a 20‑year lease, erected a pucca factory building on the premises and later claimed status as Thika tenants under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act, 1949 and its subsequent amendments. The respondents, who had purchased the land, challenged the Controller's declaration that the appellants were T

RAMDAS BANSAL (D)versusKHARAG SINGH BAID & ORS.

2012 INSC 4419 January 2012Dismissed

The appellant, Ramdas Bansal, held a 21‑year lease of a building (Grace Cinema Hall) on premises in Kolkata and, after the lease expired, the respondents filed a suit for vacant possession and rectification of the lease description. Bansal sought to introduce documents alleging that the respondents were "Thika" tenants

ASHIM RANJAN DAS (D) BY LRS.versusSHIBU BODHAK & ORS.

2018 INSC 3065 April 2018Dismissed

The appellant, Ashim Ranjan Das, purchased land that had earlier been transferred to two patta holders, Shibu Bodhak and Tapan Malik, after a series of proceedings under the West Bengal Estate Acquisition Act, 1953. The Revenue Officer had earlier cancelled tenancy rights under Section 44(2a), but that order was set as

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search