Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

DURGA PRASADversusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

2025 INSC 54823 April 2025Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a former Inspector of Police, was charged with dereliction of duty for allegedly failing to control the 1984 anti‑Sikh riots. An inquiry officer exonerated him, but the disciplinary authority disagreed and issued a punishment of reduction in rank, which the High Court set aside and directed a fresh disag

MEDHA KOTWAL LELE AND OTHERSversusUNION OF INDIA

2012 INSC 48819 October 2012Disposed off

The Supreme Court heard a group of public‑interest writ petitions concerning the ineffective implementation of the Vishaka guidelines on sexual harassment at workplaces. The Court examined affidavits from State Governments showing that many had failed to amend the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules and the Industri

S.A. KINI & ANOTHERversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS.

1985 INSC 9016 April 1985Dismissed

The petitioners, senior officers of the Canara Bank Officers' Association, alleged that senior bank officials forced bank staff to collect donations and sell greeting cards for the Canara Bank Relief and Welfare Society and the Association's Trust Fund, claiming coercion and victimisation. The Bombay High Court dismiss

DR. RAMESH CHANDRA TYAGIversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1994 INSC 6711 February 1994Appeal(s) allowed

Dr. R.C. Tyagi, a distinguished scientist, was transferred from Delhi to the Institute of Armament Technology, Pune in 1977 by an order issued by the Director General, although the Secretary of the department was the only authority empowered to transfer him. Tyagi challenged the transfer as malicious and unauthorized;

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusB.V. GOPINATH

2013 INSC 5895 September 2013Dismissed

The Union of India challenged the quashing of charge sheets issued to senior income‑tax officers under Rule 14(3) of the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 1965, arguing that the Finance Minister's approval for initiating disciplinary proceedings under Rule 14(2) also sufficed for the char

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search