Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

SANT LONGOWAL INSTT. OF ENGG. & TECH. & ANR.versusSURESH CHANDRA VERMA

2013 INSC 48318 July 2013Case Partly allowed

The appellant institute granted a lecturer three years of study leave to pursue a Ph.D. and paid him full salary and allowances. The lecturer returned to duty but failed to produce a Ph.D. certificate, prompting the institute to recover Rs.12,32,126 paid during the leave. The High Court ordered the institute to refund

DEEPIKA SINGHversusCENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL AND OTHERS

2022 INSC 83416 August 2022Appeal(s) allowed

Deepika Singh, a nursing officer at PGIMER, married a man who had two children from a previous marriage. She applied for maternity leave for her first biological child under Rule 43 of the Central Civil Services (Leave) Rules, 1972, but the authorities denied it, arguing that she already had two surviving children for

DR. ROHIT KUMARversusSECRETARY OFFICE OF LT. GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.

2021 INSC 33615 July 2021Disposed off

Dr. Rohit Kumar, a government doctor in Delhi, cleared the INICET‑2020 exam and was allotted an MD seat at PGI Chandigarh. He applied for study leave, but a policy dated 20 Oct 2020, issued in view of the COVID‑19 pandemic, barred further study leaves for government doctors, leading to the rejection of his application

KAKALI GHOSHversusCHIEF SECRETARY, ANDAMAN & NICOBAR ADMINISTRATION AND ORS.

2014 INSC 27315 April 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a woman Central Government employee, applied for uninterrupted child care leave (CCL) of 730 days to care for her minor son, but the competent authority granted only 45 days without explaining the refusal of the remaining period. The Central Administrative Tribunal directed the authority to grant the ful

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search