Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

KUNNASHADA MUTHUKOYAversusADMINISTRATOR U.T. OF LAKSHADWEEP AND ANR.

2008 INSC 99629 August 2008Dismissed

The appellant, a lineman in the Lakshadweep Electricity Department, claimed a higher pay scale after the Fourth Pay Commission because his post was classified as Group C. The Central Administrative Tribunal had granted his claim, but the High Court set it aside, relying on Union of India v. P.V. Hariharan. The appellan

UNION OF INDIAversusMAKHAN CHANDRA ROY ETC.

1997 INSC 43022 April 1997Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India challenged two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that had granted higher pay‑scales to a laboratory assistant and a malaria technician beyond those prescribed in the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 1986. The Supreme Court held that the Tribunal had overstepped its jurisd

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA & ORS.versusB. ANIL KUMAR & ORS.

2010 INSC 30911 May 2010Dismissed

The respondents, originally investigators in the NSSO, were promoted to Assistant Superintendents after 1 January 1986. They argued that, despite a Board of Arbitration award granting a special pay of Rs.75 per month to Assistant Superintendents, the government had not incorporated this special pay into their revised p

STATE OF MIZORAM AND ANR.versusMIZORAM ENGINEERING SERVICE ASSOCIATION AND ANR.

2004 INSC 3706 May 2004Dismissed

The State of Mizoram issued a notification withdrawing the revised pay scales for Executive Engineers and Superintending Engineers, prompting the Mizoram Engineering Service Association to file a writ petition seeking the quashing of the notification and the grant of higher pay scales to Chief Engineers and Additional

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search