Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008

8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8

UNION OF INIDA AND 4 OTHERSversusKHURSHEED AHMAD HASHMI AND ANOTHER

The Union of India and four other respondents filed a writ petition challenging two orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) that directed the grant of Non‑Functional Upgrade (NFU) to two retired Junior Works Managers of the Department of Defence Production. The respondents had served in …

THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER & OTHERSversusS. LALITHA & OTHERS

2025 INSC 565Disposed off

S. Lalitha, a Doordarshan employee, received second and third financial upgradations under the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme in 2010 and 2015. In 2016 she filed a representation seeking the second upgradation under the earlier Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP) as of 2009 …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusN.M. RAUT & ORS.

2024 INSC 1042Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the interpretation of the Modified Assured Career Progression Scheme (MACPS), 2008, particularly how financial upgradations granted under the Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 should be counted for MACPS eligibility. Respondents, employed as Pharmacists and …

UNION OF INDIA & ORSversusD.G.O.F. EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION AND ANR.

2023 INSC 995Dismissed

The D.G.O.F. Employees Association, representing assistants and personal assistants of the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) headquarters, sought parity in pay with similarly placed employees of the Central Secretariat Service (CSS) and other central cadres, invoking para 3.1.9 of the Sixth Central Pay …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusEX. HC/GD VIRENDER SINGH

2022 INSC 850Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme for Central Armed Police Forces should be applied from 1 January 2006 or from 1 September 2008, and what financial up‑gradation entitlement it confers. It held that the MACP Scheme became operative on 1 …

THE DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT & ANR.versusK. SUDHEESH KUMAR & ORS.

2022 INSC 114Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, former Assistant Enforcement Officers, claimed that on their third financial upgradation under the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme they were entitled to a grade pay of Rs.6600, the grade pay of the next promotional post. The High Court allowed this claim, …

UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERSversusM. V. MOHANAN NAIR

2020 INSC 281Disposed off

The Union of India appealed against several High Court orders that had granted employees financial upgradation in the grade‑pay of the next promotional hierarchy under the Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) Scheme, relying on the Raj Pal judgment. The respondents argued that MACP should be …