Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
275 judgments · newest first · showing 201–275
The Union of India appealed a decision of the Allahabad High Court that struck down paragraph 7 of Central Excise Notification No. 175 of 1986, which excluded from exemption any small‑scale manufacturer that affixed the brand or trade name of a person not eligible for the exemption. The Court …
The Union of India appealed against the renewal of a salt‑pan licence granted to the respondents, Laxman Gajanan Desai and others, on the ground that title to the land was still in dispute. The Bombay High Court had directed that the licence could be renewed without the respondents conceding title, …
Vareliweaves Pvt. Ltd. imported partially oriented yarn (POY) and claimed exemption from countervailing duty (CVD) under a 1982 notification, arguing that the yarn fell in the 100‑750 denier category. The customs authorities, relying on a 1980 circular, treated the POY as belonging to the 75‑100 …
M/s Chandrapur Magnet Wires (P) Ltd manufactured enamelled copper winding wires using duty‑paid copper wire bars. Certain final products were exempt from excise duty under Notification 69/86‑CE (as amended by 106/88), which required that no credit be taken on the inputs under Rule 57A of the Central …
The assessees, M/s Steel Strips Ltd., manufactured cold‑rolled steel strips from hot‑rolled strips, which under Central Excise Tariff Item 26AA attracted a higher duty (Rs 650/MT) than hot‑rolled strips (Rs 450/MT). The excise authorities contended that the cold‑rolled strips were the result of a …
The Union of India challenged the clearance of aluminium dross and skimmings by Indian Aluminium Co. Ltd. without payment of excise duty. The company claimed credit for duty paid on aluminium ingots under Rule 56A while clearing aluminium sheets, and argued that the dross and skimmings, being waste, …
Bombay Chemical Private Ltd manufactured disinfectant fluids and claimed exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 55/75‑CE (as amended by Notification No. 62178 in 1978) which added Item 18 covering insecticides, pesticides, weedicides and fungicides. The Assistant Collector rejected the …
The case concerned two composite textile mills that manufactured cotton yarn in their weaving departments and used it captive in their spinning departments to produce fabric. An exemption notification dated 18 June 1977 exempted such yarn from excise duty, but a later notification dated 15 July 1977 …
Metal Box India Ltd., a manufacturer of metal containers, sold its goods to Ponds (I) Ltd., a wholesale buyer, under agreements that allowed interest‑free advances and trade discounts. The tax authorities treated the contract price as the net price after discounts and omitted the value of the …
Liberty Oil Mills, a manufacturer of vegetable product (Tariff Item 13), claimed exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 61/71 (as amended by Notification No. 40/72) which granted a concession of Rs 10 per quintal for vegetable product produced out of indigenous rice bran oil, subject to …
Mis Quality Steel Tubes (P) Ltd. manufactured welded steel pipes and tubes using duty‑paid raw material and installed a tube mill and welding head as part of a plant expansion. The Central Excise authorities seized the plant and issued a show‑cause notice alleging that the machinery, classified …
Mac Laboratories, a manufacturer of Kemicetine Vaginal Suppositories containing chloramphenicol, claimed exemption from excise duty under Notification No. 116/69‑CE (as amended) which exempts "chloramphenicol and its esters for oral and parenteral use". The department issued notices denying …
The Supreme Court examined Notification No. 146/74 issued under the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which provided a rebate on excise duty for sugar produced in excess of the average production of the preceding five years. The dispute centered on whether the percentage rebates in sub‑clauses (a) to (e) …
Mis. Graver and Weil (India) Ltd. manufactured sodium bichromate and transferred it to an adjoining Chromic Acid section where chromic‑acid flakes were produced using power. The flakes were removed without payment of excise duty and were seized. The Collector imposed a penalty and ordered …
Mis Punjab Footwear Ltd. (appellant) manufactured footwear partly in its own factory and partly through Mis Stepwell Industries Ltd. under a licence agreement that allowed Stepwell's workers to operate machines and use electricity within the appellant's premises. The appellant claimed exemption from …
Rainbow Industries, a dye‑stuff manufacturer, filed a price list under Rule 173(2) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 for sales to related persons, which the department approved effective 1 October 1975. About a year later the department issued a show‑cause notice demanding revision of the assessable …
The Tamil Nadu Housing Board, a statutory body registered under the Factories Act, operated a concrete unit (licensed) and a wood‑working unit (unlicensed) whose products were used only in its own buildings. The Central Excise Department issued a show‑cause notice alleging duty evasion on the wood …
H.M.M. Ltd. claimed that the metal screw caps used to seal bottles of Horlicks are component parts of the finished product and therefore eligible for a duty exemption under Notification No. 201/79‑CE. The Collector (Appeals) allowed the claim, but the Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate …
The appellant, Indian Cable Co., produced PVC compound (granules) from duty‑paid PVC resin and was assessed excise duty on the compound. The Tribunal held that the conversion constituted "manufacture" under Sec. 2(t) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and that the compound was dutiable. The …
Mis Novopan India Ltd., a manufacturer of particle boards, claimed exemption from central excise duty under Notification No.55 of 1979, which exempted "unveneered particle boards" (Item‑6 of the table). After initially producing unveneered boards, the company began manufacturing melamine faced …
The Supreme Court examined whether Prestige Engineering could claim exemption under Notification No. 119/75 CE, which provides duty relief for goods manufactured as "job work". The appellant received steel pipes from Modipon and added guide rings, strengthening rings, adopters and plastic sleeves, …
Rollatainers Ltd., a manufacturer of printed cartons, claimed exemption from central excise duty under Notification No. 55/75, which exempts "all products of the Printing Industry". The Superintendent of Central Excise held that printed cartons are products of the Packaging Industry and not eligible …
HICO Products Ltd., a manufacturer of medicinal silicone products such as dimethicone and simethicone, claimed that these goods should be classified under the residuary Tariff Item 68 and therefore be exempt from excise duty under government notifications of 1982. The Central Excise authorities …
ITC Paper Boards Ltd. appealed against the CEGAT order denying it full exemption from excise duty on paperboard manufactured since 1979. The exemption was granted to printing and writing paper by a 24 April 1981 notification and later extended to paperboard by a 2 April 1984 notification, with a …
The petitioners, ship‑breakers, were directed by the Central Excise authorities to pay duty on ship scrap, which they contested as not being ‘manufacture’ under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. The Gujarat High Court, in an interim order, allowed them to clear the scrap on payment of 25% of …
The Central Excise Collector appealed against several sugar factories claiming that they were not entitled to the excise‑duty rebate under four Government notifications because the factories had produced no sugar in the corresponding periods of the base year. The factories argued that the phrase …
The petitioners, Ahmedabad Manufacturing and Calico Printing Co. Ltd. and others, challenged the levy of central excise duty on the weight of yarn after it had been sized for weaving, contending that duty should be based on the unsized yarn. The High Court had ordered a refund, but the Government …
The appellants, Steel Rolling Mills, purchased iron billets (duty Rs 330/ton) and rolled them into MS flats (duty Rs 120/ton) which were exported. They claimed export rebate at Rs 450/ton, arguing that rebate should cover duty paid on both raw billets and finished flats. The Collector, relying on …
Thermax Private Ltd imported chillers and paid customs duty and counter‑valing duty (CVD) but later claimed exemption from the CVD under Section 3(1) of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, relying on notifications issued under Section 8 of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. The Collector of Customs …
PEFCO Foundry Chemicals Ltd manufactured cylinder liners by casting iron and then machining and honing them before delivering the goods to Indian Railways. The Central Excise authorities treated the liners, at the time of supply, as fully machined machine parts liable to duty under Entry 68, while …
Multimetals Ltd. manufactured copper pipes and tubes and claimed exemption from excise duty on the total quantity of copper and copper alloys used, including the material lost during manufacturing. The Central Excise Department argued that the exemption should be calculated only on the weight of the …
The Revenue appealed against orders of the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal that had allowed exemption from excise duty to Rajasthan State Chemical Works and Sunderson (Minerals) Ltd. under Notification No.179/77 CE, which exempts goods where no process is ordinarily carried on …
Texmaco Ltd. manufactured wagon bodies for the Railways and mounted them on wheel sets supplied free of charge by the Railways. Its invoices reflected only the price of the wagon bodies, excluding the wheel sets, and excise duty was paid on this invoice value. The Revenue demanded duty on the wheel …
G. Claridge & Co. Ltd., a manufacturer of molded pulp egg trays, sought exemption from central excise duty by classifying its products as "containers" under Item 17 of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and Heading 48.18 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. The tax authorities classified the …
Shiva Glass Works Co. Ltd., a licensee under the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944, paid excise duty on glassware based on price lists submitted for provisional assessment. A search revealed two sets of bills, indicating that duty had been paid at lower rates than the actual sale prices. The …
The respondent, proprietor of Neptune Waterproof Manufacturing Co., purchased plain kraft paper and applied various coatings such as bitumen, polyethylene, wax, and jute to produce waterproof and laminated papers. The company contended that these processes did not create a new article and therefore …
The appellant, ESKA YEF Ltd., manufactured Bifuran Supplement, Neftin‑50 and Neftin‑200 and claimed they were exempt from central excise duty as "animal feed supplements" under Item 68 of the Central Excise Tariff, relying on a 1984 notification. The Revenue argued that the products contained …
Laminated Packings (P) Ltd. lamination of duty‑paid kraft paper with polyethylene produced polyethylene‑laminated kraft paper. The issue was whether this process amounted to "manufacture" under Section 2(f) of the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 and thus attracted excise duty. The Collector …
Rohit Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd., a small-scale manufacturer using waste paper and cereal straw, sought the concessional excise rates under Notification No. 25 of 1984, which excluded "coated paper (including waxed paper)" from the benefit. The factory produced art paper and chromo paper, both coated …
Frick India Ltd., a licensed manufacturer of air‑conditioning and refrigeration equipment, cleared cooling coils, condensers and compressors for cold‑storage and ice‑factory plants and paid excise duty under Tariff Item 29A(3). The company claimed a refund, arguing that these parts were not …
The Collector of Central Excise appealed against a Tribunal order that held Decent Dyeing Co. not liable for the differential excise duty on base acrylic yarn used for texturising. The dyeing company paid duty at Rs 10 per kg under Notification No. 125/75‑CE, assuming the base yarn’s duty had …
Pond's India Ltd., a manufacturer of talc and face powder, claimed a deduction for the cost of secondary packing (master cartons) used for transporting small packs to wholesale dealers. The claim was initially approved but later disallowed by the Assistant Collector, who treated the outer cartons as …
Ballarpur Industries Ltd. used sodium sulphate in its paper and paper‑board manufacturing process and claimed proforma credits under Notification No. 105/82‑CE. The Superintendent of Central Excise rejected the claim, holding that the chemical was burnt up and did not remain in the finished product, …
Wallace Flour Mills Co. Ltd., a manufacturer of food products, claimed that stocks of goods fully manufactured before the Finance Bill 1987-88 made them dutiable (effective 1 March 1987) should be cleared duty‑free as pre‑budget stocks. The Assistant Collector, the Collector (Appeals) and the …
Punjab Anand Lamp Industries manufactured printed sleeves for packing electric bulbs and tube lights. The Collector of Central Excise classified these sleeves as items under Tariff Item 17(3) and demanded excise duty. The Customs, Excise & Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal held that the sleeves …
The Collector of Central Excise appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise & Gold Control Appellate Tribunal which had allowed a refund to Ashoka Mills Ltd. for yarn produced between 17 March 1972 and 23 July 1972 and cleared for captive consumption before 24 July 1972. The dispute centered …
Eastend Paper Industries Ltd. manufactured various papers, including wrapping paper, and removed 4,000 kg of wrapping paper from its factory without paying excise duty. The Revenue issued a show‑cause notice under Rules 9(1), 173‑F and 173‑G of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, alleging duty evasion. …
Padmini Products, a manufacturer of agarbatis and dhoop sticks, claimed exemption from excise duty and licensing on the ground that the products were "handicrafts" under Notification 55/75 and thus exempt under Notification 111/78. The Collector rejected the claim, holding the items were not …
Tata Oil Mills Co. Ltd., a soap manufacturer, sought a rebate under Rule 8(1) of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, relying on Notifications 46/72, 153/73 and 25/75 which grant exemption for soap made from indigenous rice bran oil. The company used rice bran oil that was pre‑treated into rice bran …
The respondent, Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises, manufactured sorbitol and also produced starch hydrolysate, which it used internally. The Collector of Central Excise claimed that the hydrolysate was glucose, fell under Item 1‑E of the Central Excise Tariff and was liable to excise duty. The respondent …
Playworld Electronics Pvt. Ltd. manufactured wireless sets, tape recorders and tape players that were unbranded in its price list but were sold exclusively under the "Bush" brand to Bush India Ltd. and its authorised dealers. The Revenue issued a Show‑Cause Notice alleging that Bush India was a …
India Cements Ltd., a manufacturer of superfine cement, claimed a refund of Rs 22,43,002.09 paid as excise duty on the cost of packing material between July 1974 and March 1975, asserting that such duty was not leviable. The department rejected the claim, holding that the payment was not made under …
The respondent, ChempHar Drugs, manufactured patent and proprietary medicines and pharmacopoeia preparations and claimed exemption from excise duty under Notification 71/78, but omitted the value of goods falling under Tariff Item 68 in its declaration. The Collector issued a show‑cause notice and …
Bhor Industries Ltd., a manufacturer of crude PVC films used as intermediate inputs for leather cloth, laminated jute mattings and PVC tapes, claimed that the films were non‑marketable and therefore not liable to excise duty. The Appellate Collector (1974) accepted this view, but the Assistant …
The Supreme Court clarified the method of computing the assessable value of processed fabric for Central Excise duty. It held that the assessable value equals the value of the grey cloth in the processor's possession plus the value of the job‑work performed and the processor's manufacturing profit …
Mafatlal Fine Spinning & Manufacturing Co. Ltd. deferred payment of yarn excise duty under Rule 49A of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The cotton fabrics produced were subjected to calendering and shearing before clearance. The question was whether these finishing operations transformed the "grey" …
Siddeshwari Cotton Mills manufactured cotton fabric on power looms and claimed exemption from excise duty as "unprocessed" fabric under Notifications 230/77 and 231/77. The mill subjected the fabric to a calendering process, after which the Central Excise authorities held that the fabric was no …
The respondent, Dhanalakshmi Paper and Board Mills, set up a paper‑board factory and began production on 7 May 1964. It claimed a concessional excise duty rate under a Government of India notification dated 1 March 1964, but the revenue department denied the benefit because clause (a) of Proviso 3 …
Parle Exports (P) Ltd manufactured non‑alcoholic beverage bases such as Gold Spot, Limca and Thumps Up under Tariff Item 68 without a valid central excise licence and was assessed duty and penalty. The company claimed exemption under Notification No. 55/75 CE, which exempts "all kinds of food …
Elson Machines Ltd., a manufacturer of electric motors, claimed exemption under Notification No. 80/80‑C.E. (dated 19‑June‑1980) which allowed small‑scale manufacturers to clear specified goods for home consumption provided the aggregate clearance value did not exceed Rs 15 lakhs. The company …
Kosan Metal Products Ltd, a manufacturer of LPG valves, claimed a set‑off of excise duty on brass rods received from another company under Notification 178/77. The rods were later re‑classified, and the Superintendent of Central Excise issued a show‑cause notice under Rule 10 demanding recovery of …
Aditya Mills Ltd. produced a yarn called PPRF, made by doubling two plies of polyester spun yarn with one ply of rayon filament yarn. The company claimed that excise duty had already been paid on the component yarns and sought to clear the product under Rule 173B of the Central Excise Rules. The …
Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. (the appellant) manufactured wheels, tyres and axles for Indian Railways, forging them and then machining and polishing to remove excess steel skin. The Revenue argued that the goods became a new commercial commodity after machining, making them liable to excise duty under …
J.K. Cotton Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd., a composite mill, produced yarn as an intermediate product and then wove it into fabrics on the same premises. The issue was whether the yarn was liable to central excise duty under the amended Rule 9 and Rule 49 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944, which …
Mysore Rolling Mills manufactured aluminium wire rods for customers and, between September 1974 and May 1977, collected Rs 60 per metric ton as handling charges in addition to regular invoices. The Excise authorities issued a notice under Rule 10(i)(c) to add these handling charges to the invoice …
Premier Tyres Ltd. challenged a Customs, Excise and Gold Control Appellate Tribunal order on the sequence of applying three Central Excise notifications granting duty exemptions. The dispute centered on whether the 1977 notification (exempting duty equal to that paid on inputs) should be applied …
Madras Rubber Factory Ltd. (MRF) claimed a series of post‑manufacturing deductions – including TAC/Warranty discount, product discounts, interest on stock and receivables, overriding commission, distribution costs, government price differentials, secondary packaging charges and excise duty on …
Modi Rubber Ltd, a tyre manufacturer, claimed that two Government notifications (1974 and 1981) exempted it from all forms of excise duty, including special and additional duties levied under various Finance Acts. The Central Government and the Revenue argued that the phrase "duty of excise" in …
Andhra Re‑rolling Works converted 3,000 metric tonnes of untested rails into M.S. rounds under a contract. The Central Excise authorities issued notices demanding excise duty on the rounds under Item 26AA(i) of the First Schedule of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944, invoking Rule 10‑A of the …
The respondents, cigarette manufacturers, packed cigarettes in primary packets, secondary cartons and finally in corrugated fibre‑board containers and argued that the cost of the final containers should not be part of the "value" for excise duty. The Union of India contended that all packing, …
Bata Shoe Co. Ltd. manufactured footwear sold at a wholesale price of Rs 6.25 per pair. A 1967 notification exempted footwear under Item 36 of the Central Excise and Salt Act, 1944 if its "value" did not exceed Rs 5 per pair. The company argued that, under Section 4 of the Act, the value—after …
Moped India Ltd manufactured mopeds and sold them to a network of dealers under agreements that allowed the dealers a commission of Rs.110, Rs.145 or Rs.165 per unit, which the company treated as a trade discount and deducted from the price list for excise duty purposes. The Assistant Collector of …
Atul Products Ltd manufactured synthetic organic dyes (cibagenes and cibanogenes) and relied on Notification No. 180/61 dated 23 November 1961, which exempted dyes from excise duty if they were produced from other dyes on which duty had already been paid. The basic dyes used were manufactured before …
The Central Excise Department denied Dunlop India Ltd. an exemption on excise duty, alleging the company had previously cleared goods without paying duty and only relied on bank guarantees obtained under interim court orders. Dunlop filed a writ petition in the Calcutta High Court under Art. 226 …
The respondents, each owning no more than four powerlooms acquired from licensed manufacturers, claimed exemption from excise duty on cotton fabrics under Item 7 of the 1957 exemption notification. The Central Government had introduced a series of provisos, the third of which (effective 1 April …
