Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Central Excise Tariff Act

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

M/S. UNITED COPIEX (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF SALES TAX

1996 INSC 43525 March 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, manufacturers of rubber flaps used to protect tyre tubes, were taxed under sub‑entry (2) of Entry 43 of the Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax Act, 1948 as accessories of motor vehicles. They contended that the flaps were not accessories of a motor vehicle but only of tyres or tubes and should therefore be taxed a

M/S. GEM GRANITESversusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TAMIL NADU

2004 INSC 66723 November 2004Dismissed

Mis. Gem Granites, an exporter of cut and polished granite, claimed a deduction under Section 80‑HHC of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1987‑88. The issue was whether processed granite fell within the exclusionary clause "minerals and ores" in sub‑section (2)(b) of the provision as it stood before the

M/S. NATURALLE HEALTH PRODUCTS (P) LTD.versusCOLLECTOR OF CENTRAL EXCISE, HYDERABAD

2003 INSC 62311 November 2003Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Naturalle Health Products (P) Ltd. manufactured medicated cough drops, throat drops, Sloan's balm and Sloan's rub under an Ayurvedic drug licence and claimed that the products should be classified under Chapter 3003.30 of the Central Excise Tariff as Ayurvedic medicaments, attracting nil duty. The Central Excise au

M/S. DEEPAK AGRO SOLUTION LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, MAHARASHTRA

2008 INSC 6148 May 2008Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Deepak Agro Solution Ltd. imported 200 MT of "Brimstone 90", a product containing about 90 % sulphur and 10 % bentonite, and classified it under Customs Tariff Heading 25.03 (unrefined sulphur). The Deputy Commissioner of Customs re‑classified the goods under Heading 38.08, which deals with insecticides, fungicides

COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISEversusM/S. ESWARAN AND SONS ENGINEERS LTD.

2005 INSC 85 January 2005Appeal(s) allowed

Mis. Eswaran and Sons Engineers Ltd manufactured Minimum Oil Circuit Breakers and had been paying excise duty by classifying them under tariff sub‑heading 8535. The Department issued show‑cause notices in 1993‑94 seeking reclassification to sub‑heading 8537 and the Assistant Collector reclassified the goods on 19‑Dec‑1

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search