Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Central Sales Tax Act

24 judgments · newest first · showing 1–24

Ircon International Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar and Ors

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court considered four writ applications filed by Ircon International Ltd. seeking refunds of taxes and penalties imposed under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, including a Rs 18.52 crore recovery under Section 47, and smaller refunds for the years 2005‑06, 2006‑07 and 2011‑12 …

Ircon International Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court considered four civil writ applications filed by Ircon International Ltd. seeking refunds of amounts recovered under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, including a Rs 18.52 crore recovery under Section 47 and smaller refunds for the years 2005‑06, 2006‑07 and 2011‑12. The …

Ircon International Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court considered four writ applications filed by Ircon International Ltd. seeking refunds of VAT amounts recovered under Section 47 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and relief from penalties imposed under Section 41(6). The petitioner argued that the tax on fabricated steel …

Ircon International Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

DISMISSED

The Patna High Court considered four writ applications filed by Ircon International Ltd. seeking refunds of VAT amounts recovered under Section 47 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and relief from penalties imposed under Section 41(6). The petitioner argued that the tax on fabricated steel …

M/S TATA MOTORS LTD.versusTHE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES (SPL) & ANR.

2023 INSC 533Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether a credit note issued by an automobile manufacturer to a dealer, for replacing a defective part under a warranty, constitutes a sale liable to sales tax. It held that when the dealer uses a part from his own stock or purchases it from the market and is reimbursed by …

COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL EXCISE & CUSTOMS, KERALAversusM/S LARSEN & TOUBRO LTD.

2015 INSC 589Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether service tax could be levied on indivisible works contracts entered into after the Finance Act, 1994 but before the 2007 amendment that expressly made such contracts taxable. It held that the 1994 Act neither charged nor provided machinery to assess service tax on …

STATE OF KARNATAKAversusM/S PRO LAB & ORS. ETC.

2015 INSC 76Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of Entry 25 of Schedule VI of the Karnataka Sales Tax Act, 1957, which levies tax on the processing and supply of photographs, photo prints and photo negatives. The issue centered on whether the State could tax the goods component of a works …

COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICERversusM/S. JALANI ENTERPRISES

2011 INSC 218Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined whether Jaljira and similar spice mixtures manufactured by M/s Jalani Enterprises constitute "packed masala" under Entry No. 184 of the Rajasthan Sales Tax notification dated 29.03.2001. The High Court had held that Jaljira was a drink falling under the residuary entry and …

PERIYAR & PAREEKANNI RUBBERS LTD.versusSTATE OF KERALA

2008 INSC 323Dismissed

Periyar & Pareekanni Rubbers Ltd., a distillery registered under the Kerala General Sales Tax Act, leased its factory to Eagle Distillery Ltd. The lessee continued to use the lessor's sales‑tax registration number and statutory Forms C and D, but failed to remit the tax collected. The assessing …

REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONERversusM/S. RAJS CONTINENTAL EXPORTS (P.) LTD.

2007 INSC 250Dismissed

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner appealed against a Karnataka High Court order that had held Raj's Continental Exports (P) Ltd was not a branch of Mis. Continental Exporters, a proprietorship owned by the same individual who was also the Managing Director of the company. The respondent …

M/S VIVIDH MARBLES PVT. LTD.versusCOMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER

2007 INSC 197Dismissed

The State of Rajasthan introduced two sales‑tax incentive schemes, a 1987 scheme offering 100% exemption and a 1989 scheme offering 75% exemption, and allowed entrepreneurs to opt for one. Vividh Marbles Pvt Ltd chose the 1989 scheme and obtained an eligibility certificate, but the assessing …

TATA MOTORS LTD.versusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

2004 INSC 367Case Partly allowed

Tata Motors Ltd., a manufacturer of motor vehicle chassis and parts, claimed a set‑off of sales tax for purchases of steel that later became scrap, invoking Rules 41D and 41E of the Bombay Sales Tax Rules. The Maharashtra Sales Tax Laws (Levy, Amendment and Repeal) Act, 1989 retrospectively withdrew …

VISHWANATH JHUNJHUNWALAversusSTATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.

2004 INSC 279Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a partnership firm engaged in oil refining on its own account and on a job‑work basis, sought to import coal from outside Uttar Pradesh using Form‑31, which is required for imports "in connection with business" under the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948. The Assistant Commissioner issued a …

TIN PLATE CO. OF INDIA LTD.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1998 INSC 411Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Tin Plate Co. of India Ltd., a manufacturer registered under the Bihar Sales Tax Act and Central Sales Tax Act, filed its return for assessment year 1985‑86. The Commercial Tax Officer disallowed its claim of stock transfer as inter‑state sales and levied 10% tax, issuing a demand …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRAversusM/S. EMBEE CORPORATION, BOMBAY

1997 INSC 614Dismissed

M/s Embee Corporation entered into a contract with the Directorate General of Supplies & Disposal (DGS&D) to import carbamite from West Germany for use in a government explosives factory. The importer claimed exemption from Central Sales Tax, arguing that the sale was in the course of import under …

M/S. CHILLIES EXPORTS HOUSE LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

1997 INSC 427Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Chillies Export House Ltd., a public limited company engaged in exporting chillies, claimed that its activities of sorting, grading, clipping, stemming and fumigation (the latter performed by a contractor) amounted to "processing of goods" under the Finance Acts, making it an "industrial …

THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANR.versusM/S. HINDUSTAN SAFETY GLASS WORKS (P) LTD.

1996 INSC 417Dismissed

The Uttar Pradesh Government issued a Gazette notification under Section 4‑A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act, 1948, granting a three‑year sales‑tax exemption to certain newly set‑up industrial units for specified goods. Hindustan Safety Glass Works (P) Ltd claimed that, under the pre‑amendment provision …

VASANTHAN FOUNDRYversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 447Appeal(s) allowed

Vasanthan Foundry, a manufacturer of rough cast iron castings, challenged a Tamil Nadu Government circular dated 14 September 1993 that re‑characterised such castings as distinct from "cast iron" and thus not "declared goods" under the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959, leading to higher tax …

K.B. HANDICRAFTS EMPORIUM AND ORS. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1993 INSC 172Disposed off

The petitioners, manufacturers of handicrafts in Haryana, purchased raw material within the state and sold the finished goods to dealers in Delhi who exported them. They claimed exemption from purchase tax under Section 9 of the Haryana General Sales Tax Act, relying on the declaration form ST‑15. …

RAJRATHA NARANBHAI MILLS. CO. LTD.versusSALES TAX OFFICER, PETLAD

1991 INSC 52Appeal(s) allowed

The company Rajratha Naranbhai Mills Ltd. was ordered to be wound up on 26 June 1967 and the liquidator invited creditors to prove claims for priority under s.530(1)(a) of the Companies Act, 1956. The Sales Tax Officer claimed priority for sales tax and penalties, arguing that the assessment orders …

STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusHARIHAR PRASAD DEBUKA ETC.

1989 INSC 68Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar issued a notification requiring carriers transporting goods exceeding a specified quantity to carry Forms XXVIII A or XXVIII B as permits for verification and assessment of sales tax. Harihar Prasad Debuka, a registered dealer, was penalised for not correctly completing the form …

HINDUSTAN AERONAUTICS LIMITEDversusSTATE OF KARNATAKA

1983 INSC 201Appeal(s) allowed

Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd, a manufacturer and service provider for aircraft, entered into a 1951 contract with the President of India (the owner) to service, repair and overhaul Air Force aircraft. The contract required the contractor to supply spare parts when the owner failed to do so, with the …