Created by Fuzzy Cloud

CGST Act, 2017

6 judgments · newest first · showing 1–6

SK EnterprisesversusUnion of India

Allowed

S.K. Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging a provisional bank attachment order dated 5 May 2026 issued under Section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017, which attached its bank accounts linked to its PAN. The petitioner argued that the order did not satisfy the strict pre‑conditions laid down by the …

MUKESH KUMAR JAINversusASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST

Mukesh Kumar Jain challenged an adjudication order dated 21‑April‑2026 passed by the Assistant Commissioner under Section 74 of the CGST Act, arguing that his GST registration was cancelled on 5‑Sept‑2023 and the show‑cause notice was served only electronically on 25‑June‑2025, leaving him unaware …

ANKUR GARGversusUNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Ankur Garg, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 29‑January‑2025 issued by the Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, in a complaint under Sections 132(1)(b), (c) and (i) of the CGST Act, 2017. The applicant contended that …

Amlitex Trading Private LimitedversusAssistant Commissioner of State Tax

Disposed Off

The petitioner, Amitex Trading Private Ltd., challenged the order dated 29 June 2026 that cancelled its GST registration on the ground of alleged violation of Rule 21(b) for issuing invoices without supply. The petitioner argued that earlier show‑cause notices on the same issue had been withdrawn …

ANKIT JOHRI AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed by Ankit Johri and Shiva Johri, who were arrested in connection with a GST evasion scheme alleged under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The applicants contended that they were merely data entry operators and that the alleged conduct …

AMIT JOSHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Amit Joshi under Section 483 of the BNS Act, 2023, seeking release from custody while facing charges under IPC sections 318(4), 340(2), 336(3) and 338 for alleged GST fraud. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR, had no ownership …