HIRA TIKKOOversusUNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH AND ORS.
2004 INSC 26713 April 2004Disposed off
The case concerned the allotment of industrial plots in Chandigarh under the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 and the 1973 Lease‑Hold Rules. Of 339 shortlisted allottees, 254 could not be given possession because much of the land was declared a reserved forest and fell within a restricted zone u…
CHANDIGARH ADMINISTRATOR & ORS. & ETC. ETC.versusMANJIT KUMAR GULATI & ORS. & ETC. ETC.
[2024] 12 S.C.R. 94710 December 2024Appeal(s) allowed
The Chandigarh Administrator sold a 99‑year leasehold booth site to Manjit Kumar Gulati and others in 1989, requiring 25% premium upfront and the balance in three installments. The allottees failed to pay the remaining 75%, were served a show‑cause notice, given multiple opportunities to clear dues, and their lease was…
PARADISE PRINTERS AND ORS.versusUNION TERRITORY OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS.
1987 INSC 3604 December 1987Dismissed
The Chandigarh administration sought to relocate scattered printing presses to an industrial area, initially earmarking 43 larger sites in Phase‑II and inviting applications with a 10% earnest money deposit. After lots were drawn in 1977 awarding sites to the appellants, the administration abandoned the Phase‑II scheme…