Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Chandigarh Lease Hold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973

4 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CHANDIGARH AND ORS. ETC.versusM/S SHANTIKUNJ INVESTMENT PVT. LTD.

2006 INSC 12928 February 2006Disposed off

Allottees of residential and commercial plots in Chandigarh were required to pay the balance of the premium in instalments, together with interest, penalty and ground rent, after an initial payment. They contended that the State could not demand these payments until basic amenities such as roads, water supply and drain

CHANDIGARH HOUSING BOARDversusAVTAR SINGH AND OTHERS

2010 INSC 63622 September 2010Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined appeals by the Chandigarh Housing Board challenging orders of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission which directed the Board to refund earnest money and interest to members of co‑operative housing societies. The Court held that the society members are the ultimate beneficiaries

M/S. TERI OAT ESTATES (P) LTD.versusU.T. CHANDIGARH AND ORS.

2003 INSC 74619 December 2003Disposed off

The appellant, M/s. Teri Oat Estates, purchased a lease‑hold site in Chandigarh and constructed a six‑storey building but failed to pay the instalments and ground rent on time, leading the Estate Officer to invoke Section 8‑A of the Capital of Punjab (Development and Regulation) Act, 1952 and cancel the lease with forf

UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH ADMN. AND ORS.versusMANAGING SOCIETY, GOSWAMI, GDSDC

1996 INSC 24214 February 1996Appeal(s) allowed

The Chandigarh Administration allotted 10.5 acres of land to the managing society for 99 years in 1975, fixing the ground rent at Rs 100 per acre per annum, which was lower than the rate mandated by Rule 13 of the Chandigarh Lease‑hold of Sites and Buildings Rules, 1973. In 1991 the Estate Officer issued a notice deman

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search