Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Act, 1999

3 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

RADHEY SHYAM & ANR.versusCHHABI NATH & ORS.

2015 INSC 16026 February 2015Matter referred to larger bench

The appellant challenged a writ order of the Allahabad High Court that had vacated an interim injunction granted by a civil court, arguing that a writ of certiorari under Article 226 could not be issued against orders of a civil court. The Supreme Court was asked to reconsider the view expressed in *Surya Dev Rai* that

YASHPAL JAINversusSUSHILA DEVI & OTHERS

2023 INSC 94820 October 2023Appeal(s) allowed

The suit was filed in 1982 by Urmila Devi to declare a sale deed void and claim possession of land. After her death in 2007, multiple applications were filed to substitute a legal representative, with Manoj Kumar Jain initially approved, later withdrawn, and Yashpal Jain seeking substitution. The trial court allowed Ya

J. SAMUEL AND OTHERSversusGATTU MAHESH AND OTHERS

2012 INSC 3116 January 2012Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed a suit for specific performance of a sale contract, but their plaint omitted the mandatory averment under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act that they were ready and willing to perform. After the trial concluded and the matter was reserved for judgment, they sought to amend the plaint under

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search