Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules

3 judgments · newest first · showing 1–3

Rajendra Prasad RamversusThe State of Bihar

ALLOWED

The petitioner, a retired Technical Advisor, was served a show‑cause notice for alleged misconduct dating back to 2009 and subsequently had a 10% deduction imposed on his monthly pension for three years under Rule 139 of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950. He contended that no formal departmental enquiry …

SATRUCHARLA CHANDRASEKHAR RAJUversusVYRICHERLA PRADEEP KUMAR DEV AND ANR.

1992 INSC 236Appeal(s) allowed

Satrucharla Raju was appointed as a single teacher in a primary school run by the Integrated Tribal Development Agency (ITDA), a registered society. He was suspended pending an enquiry, tendered his resignation on 26 October 1989 (which was not accepted), and subsequently filed his nomination and …

K. NAGARAJ & ORS. ETC. ETC.,versusSTATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH & ANR. ETC.

1985 INSC 6Dismissed

The Andhra Pradesh government, after coming to power in 1983, reduced the superannuation age for most government employees from 58 to 55 years by issuing an order and two notifications, claiming it would create employment opportunities for youth. Over 28,000 employees were forced to retire, …