Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 1976

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

MANOHAR LAL SHARMAversusTHE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY & ORS.

2014 INSC 56225 August 2014Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined public‑interest writ petitions challenging the allocation of coal blocks by the Central Government between 1993 and 2011. The Court held that the allocation process, carried out through the Screening Committee and a government‑dispensation route, was not authorized by the Mines and Minerals (

DBJAPADA DAS AND ANRversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1980 INSC 7511 April 1980Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined writ petitions filed by former coal‑mine workers alleging that Section 3(3) of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 1976, which bans coal mining by any agency other than those specified, violated Article 14 by discriminating against them. The petitioners also claimed that private m

MAHINDRA NATH SHUKLA AND ORS.versusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ORS. ETC.

1980 INSC 8011 April 1980Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 3(3) of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 1976 barred the extraction of coking coal. Petitioners argued that the amendment applied only to ordinary coal mines, not to coking coal mines, relying on the separate legislative history of coking‑coal legislation. The C

BIRA KISHORE NAIKversusCOAL INDIA LTD. & ORS.

1986 INSC 1117 May 1986Dismissed

The petition filed by B.K. Naik and 700 workmen sought a writ of mandamus directing the Central Government to declare that Natundihi Pahariabera Colliery had vested in it and to treat the petitioners as its employees with back wages under Section 14 of the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Act, 1973. The Court examined whet

TARA PRASAD SINGH ETC. ETC.versusUNION OF INDIA & OTHERS

1980 INSC 1067 May 1980Case Partly allowed

The Supreme Court examined a group of writ petitions challenging the Coal Mines (Nationalisation) Amendment Act, 1976, which terminated existing coal mining leases and barred private persons from carrying out coal mining operations. The petitioners, lessees of coal and composite (coal‑fireclay) mines, argued that the a

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search