Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

4176 judgments · newest first · showing 1801–2000

VIJAY ARJUN BHAGAT & ORS.versusNANA LAXMAN TAPKIRE & ORS.

2018 INSC 491Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a civil suit seeking declaration of ownership of certain properties. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the first appellate court set it aside in their favour. The respondents appealed to the High Court, which admitted the second appeal and framed six substantial questions …

SIDDAGANGAIAH (D) THR. LRS.versusN.K. GIRIRAJA SHETTY (D) THR. LRS.

2018 INSC 506Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant (defendant) sought to enforce a maintenance decree against her husband, during which the husband executed a sale deed of the disputed property to the plaintiff. The decree was later executed by a court auction, where the decree‑holder purchased the property, and the sale was confirmed …

CANARA BANKversusN. G. SUBBARAYA SETTY & ANR.

2018 INSC 385Appeal(s) allowed

Canara Bank granted a loan to N.G. Subbaraya Setty, who signed an unregistered assignment deed transferring the trademark "Eenadu" to the bank as security. The bank later cancelled the deed, invoking the Banking Regulation Act, and both parties litigated in 2004 – the bank seeking to declare the …

SISTERS OF ST. JOSEPH OF CLUNYversusTHE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

2018 INSC 363Disposed off

The Sisters of St. Joseph of Cluny, a society that had established Cluny Women’s College as a secular institution, later applied to the National Commission for Minority Educational Institutions (NCMEI) for a minority status certificate, which was granted in 2007. The society and the college’s …

SUCHA SINGH SODHI (D) THR. LRS.versusBALDEV RAJ WALIA & ANR.

2018 INSC 338Appeal(s) allowed

The original plaintiff, Sucha Singh, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the defendant in 1996, which he later withdrew with the court's permission to pursue appropriate proceedings before a competent forum. He subsequently filed a fresh suit for specific performance of the same agreement, …

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.versusUTILITY USERS’ WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ORS.

2018 INSC 329Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 84(2) of the Electricity Act, 2003 obliges a High Court Judge to be appointed as Chairperson of a State Electricity Regulatory Commission and whether a member of law is required on the Commission. By interpreting the statutory language, the Court held that …

CHHOTANBEN AND ANR.versusKIRITBHAI JALKRUSHNABHAI THAKKAR AND ORS.

2018 INSC 319Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, sisters and co‑owners of ancestral land, alleged that their brothers fraudulently executed a registered sale deed in 1996, forging their signatures and thumb impressions, and transferred the property without their knowledge. Upon discovering the fraud in late 2012, they filed a suit …

UMA PANDEY & ANR.versusMUNNA PANDEY & ORS.

2018 INSC 314Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, members of a family, filed a partition suit for agricultural land which was decreed in their favour by the trial court. The defendants appealed and the first appellate court reversed the decree, relying on a document labelled Ex‑A. The plaintiffs then filed a second appeal, which the …

NONIHAL SINGHversusMAYA DEVI

2018 INSC 308Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a tenant, was ordered by the Rent Tribunal to vacate the premises within six months and to pay arrears of rent. The High Court later directed the tenant to deposit the arrears by 31 December 2017 and to pay mesne profits from 1 November 2017. The tenant failed to meet the deadline, …

SITA RAM BHAMAversusRAMVATAR BHAMA

2018 INSC 260Case Partly allowed

The father of the parties, a self‑acquired owner of a house and a shop, decided to divide his property on 25‑Oct‑1992 but died on 10‑Sep‑1993. The surviving brothers recorded a memorandum of settlement on 9‑Sep‑1994, signed by their mother and sisters, allocating the entire property between them. …

MADIRAJU VENKATA RAMANA RAJUversusPEDDIREDDIGARI RAMACHANDRA REDDY & ORS.

2018 INSC 249Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant challenged the election of respondent No.1 to the Andhra Pradesh Legislative Assembly on the ground that the Returning Officer had improperly accepted the respondent's nomination form, which contained blank columns and lacked signatures on each page, violating the Representation of …

BOARD OF CONTROL FOR CRICKET IN INDIAversusKOCHI CRICKET PVT. LTD. AND ETC.

2018 INSC 238Dismissed

The Board of Control for Cricket in India filed a Section 34 challenge to arbitral awards dated June 2015, and the award creditors sought execution. The award debtor argued that the pre‑amended Section 36 imposed an automatic stay on execution until the Section 34 petition was decided, while the …

SIVAKAMI & ORS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU & ORS.

2018 INSC 226Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, owners of 1.52 acres of land, challenged a 1985 acquisition of their land by the State of Tamil Nadu under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Single Judge of the Madras High Court allowed the writ petition and quashed the acquisition but gave no reasons or discussion of the issues. …

KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ANRversusKURIEN E. KALATHIL AND ANR.

2018 INSC 224Appeal(s) allowed

The Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) contracted with Kurien E. Kalathil to construct a dam, after which a government notification raised minimum wages, leading the contractor to claim labour‑escalation charges with interest (Ex.P‑20) and additional work charges (Ex.P‑59). The High Court ordered …

ABDULRASAKHversusK. P. MOHAMMED & ORS.

2018 INSC 220Dismissed

The appellant, Abdulrasakh, was elected to the Kerala Legislative Assembly in May 2016. Two voters filed an election petition under Section 123(4) of the Representation of People Act, 1951 alleging corrupt practices, and presented the petition on 1 July 2016. The High Court Registry returned the …

UMMERversusPOTTENGAL SUBIDA & ORS.

2018 INSC 219Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an elderly man, was served with an ex parte decree by a family court for alleged non‑payment of gold ornaments and maintenance. He applied under Order IX Rule 13 of the CPC to set aside the decree and sought condonation of delay, but both applications were dismissed. He then filed a …

ANDANUR KALAMMA AND ORS.versusGANGAMMA (DEAD) BY L.RS.

2018 INSC 204Dismissed

The appellants sought a declaration of ownership and possession of a 23‑acre land that had been auctioned in 1966 to satisfy income‑tax arrears. The auction sale was confirmed by the Deputy Commissioner, but the appellant’s predecessor challenged the confirmation under Section 177 of the Karnataka …

SITARAMversusRADHEY SHYAM VISHNAV & ORS.

2018 INSC 212Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Sitaram was elected Chairperson of a municipal corporation, but the defeated candidate Radhey Shyam Vishnav filed an election petition under the Rajasthan Municipalities Election Petition Rules, 2009. The petition was filed without the mandatory treasury challan of Rs 1,000 required by …

M/S. ADVANTA INDIA LTD.versusB. N. SHIVANNA

2018 INSC 183Appeal(s) allowed

Advanta India Ltd filed a complaint against advocate B.N. Shivanna alleging cheating, fraud and fabrication of documents, leading the Karnataka State Bar Council’s Disciplinary Committee to debar him for life. The Bar Council of India (BCI) on appeal reduced the punishment to 18 months, but …

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OFversusNANDINI J. SHAH & ORS

2018 INSC 178Appeal(s) allowed

The Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) sought eviction of several respondents from a licensed premises under the Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. The Estate Officer ordered eviction; the respondents appealed to the Appellate Officer, identified as the District …

SURAT SINGH (DEAD)versusSIRI BHAGWAN & ORS.

2018 INSC 170Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a second appeal filed under Section 100 of the CPC by Siri Bhagwan against a decree favoring Murti Devi's heirs. The Punjab & Haryana High Court allowed the appeal without hearing the contesting respondent (Surat Singh, appellant No.4) and framed the substantial question …

SUNDARAM FINANCE LIMITEDversusABDUL SAMAD & ANR.

2018 INSC 146Appeal(s) allowed

Sundaram Finance Ltd. granted a loan to Abdul Samad, who defaulted, leading to arbitration under the loan agreement. An ex parte award of Rs.12.69 lakh was made, and Sundaram sought execution of the award in the Morena court, which dismissed the application for lack of jurisdiction, directing the …

AUTO CARSversusTRIMURTI CARGO MOVERS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

2018 INSC 150Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a civil suit in the Calcutta High Court for recovery of money and, after failing to serve the defendants by ordinary means, obtained permission to serve them by substituted service through newspaper publication. The summons published on 25 November 2014 instructed the defendants …

G. SARASWATHI & ANR.versusRATHINAMMAL & ORS.

2018 INSC 142Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a civil suit seeking specific performance of an agreement, which the trial court decreed in their favour. The High Court single judge set aside that decree, and the appellants filed a Letters Patent Appeal (LPA) before the Division Bench of the High Court. The Division Bench …

MAHANTH SATYANAND @ RAMJEE SINGHversusSHYAM LAL CHAUHAN AND OTHERS

2018 INSC 117Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a civil suit in which the original defendant, Swami Sheo Dharmanand, died during the pendency of a second appeal before the Patna High Court. Two rival claimants each filed applications under Order XXII Rule 5 of the CPC, seeking to be recognized as the legal representative of …

BENGAL CHEMISTS & DRUGGISTS ASSN.versusKALYAN CHOWDHURY

2018 INSC 91Dismissed

Bengal Chemists & Druggists Assn. appealed against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) that dismissed its appeal as not maintainable because it was filed nine days after the initial 45‑day limitation period and after the additional 45‑day grace period had also expired. …

THE MUNICIPAL COUNCIL, RAGHOGARH & ANR.versusNATIONAL FERTILIZER LTD. & ORS.

2018 INSC 69Dismissed

The Municipal Council of Raghogarh demanded external development charges of Rs.5 per square metre from National Fertilizers Ltd. and Gas Authority of India Ltd. for colonies they had constructed on forest land within the municipal limits. The respondents, both public sector undertakings, argued that …

M/S NEERJA REALTORS PVT LTDversusJANGLU (DEAD) THR. LR.

2018 INSC 67Dismissed

M/s Neerja Realtors Pvt Ltd sued the deceased Janglu for specific performance of a land sale agreement. The trial court issued summons, but the bailiff reported that the defendant had vacated the premises and the summons were returned unserved. An application for substituted service under Order V …

JAYAPRAKASH & ANR.versusT. S. DAVID & ORS.

2018 INSC 61Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement against four defendants. Defendants 1 and 2, the original owners, failed to sell the property and the suit proceeded ex parte, resulting in an ex parte decree. Defendants 3 and 4 successfully set aside the decree under Order 9 …

N. C. BANSALversusUTTAR PRADESH FINANCIAL CORPORATION & ANR.

2018 INSC 62Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, N.C. Bansal, filed a civil suit seeking a declaration and permanent injunction concerning a property. The trial court dismissed the suit as non‑maintainable; an appellate court remanded the matter for trial. After remand, the plaintiff filed three applications: (i) under Order 7 Rule …

KANAKLATA DAS & ORS.versusNABA KUMAR DAS & ORS.

2018 INSC 56Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed an ejectment suit under the West Bengal Tenancy Act to evict respondents Nos. 2‑5 for non‑payment of rent and other grounds. Respondent No.1, claiming co‑ownership of the suit premises, applied under Order I Rule 10(2) of the CPC to be impleaded as a co‑plaintiff. The trial …

RAMJI SINGH PATELversusGYAN CHANDRA JAISWAL

2018 INSC 23Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent operated a flour mill and related businesses from his residential premises, initially using electricity but from 2003 switched to diesel engines that caused severe vibrations and air pollution affecting the adjoining house of the appellant. The appellant filed a suit in 2004 seeking a …

NAGAIAH AND ANOTHERversusSMT. CHOWDAMMA (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ANOTHER

2018 INSC 6Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, two brothers, filed a suit in 1985 seeking a declaration that they were entitled to two‑thirds of a family property and that a sale deed executed by their father in favour of the second defendant was not binding on their share. The suit was filed on behalf of the younger brother, who …

UNION OF INDIAversusVIJAY KRISHNA UNIYAL (D) THROUGH LRS.

[2017] 14 S.C.R. 68Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India, as the owner of land covered by an Old Grant, issued a notice to resume a 3.398‑acre property in Landour Cantonment occupied by Vijay Krishna Uniyal, who sued for a permanent injunction claiming ownership based on a 1980 sale deed and long possession. The trial court, the first …

RAJ KUMAR BHATIAversusSUBHASH CHANDER BHATIA

2017 INSC 1240Appeal(s) allowed

The suit concerned possession of a property claimed to be joint Hindu family property. The appellant, Raj Kumar Bhatia, sought to amend his written statement to elaborate that the property was coparcenary undivided HUF, an argument already contained in his original statement. The Trial Court allowed …

MOHINDER KUMAR MEHRAversusROOP RANI MEHRA & ORS.

2017 INSC 1212Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a partition suit for a family property and later sought to amend the plaint to claim a share in the sale proceeds of another family property sold in 2000. The amendment application was filed on 17 January 2011, before any evidence had been led, although issues had been framed and …

TRILOK SINGH CHAUHANversusRAM LAL (DEAD) THR. LRS.

2017 INSC 1213Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord filed a suit in the Small Causes Court for recovery of rent and eviction of the tenant, claiming a rent of Rs.1500 per month. The trial court upheld this claim and decreed eviction, but the tenant obtained a revision from the High Court under Section 25 of the Provincial Small Cause …

ATMA RAM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD.versusTHE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO. LTD.

2017 INSC 1196Dismissed

The landlord Atma Ram Properties sued its tenant Oriental Insurance for possession, claiming that a huge property tax payable under the New Delhi Municipal Council Act, 1994 could be treated as arrears of rent, raising the total rent above Rs.3,500 per month and thereby removing the tenant’s …

REVANASIDDAYYAversusGANGAMMA @ SHASHIKALA & ANR.

2017 INSC 1171Disposed off

The appellant purchased land from the original owner, Veerabasayya, and was given possession after paying earnest money, but the owner died before the sale deed was executed. The respondents, as legal heirs, sued for a declaration of ownership and possession, and the trial court declared them owners …

C. VENKATA SWAMYversusH. N. SHIVANNA (D) BY L.R. & ANR. ETC.

2017 INSC 1166Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed suit O.S. No. 6640/1996 for declaration and injunction over a piece of land, while the respondent filed a cross‑suit O.S. No. 2150/1992; both suits were clubbed and the trial court dismissed the appellant's suit and decreed the cross‑suit. The appellant then filed two first …

ANIL KUMAR SINGHversusV!JAY PAL SINGH & ORS.

2017 INSC 1161Appeal(s) allowed

Anil Kumar Singh filed a civil suit for a permanent injunction over a parcel of land and obtained an ex‑parte temporary injunction. He later filed an application under Order XXIII Rule 1 of the CPC seeking to withdraw the suit, which the trial court allowed subject to payment of Rs 350 as costs to …

SMT. BAYANABAI KAWAREversusRAJENDRA S/O BABURAO DHOTE

2017 INSC 1136Dismissed

The plaintiff purchased a plot from a housing cooperative society by a registered sale deed dated 29‑12‑1981 and was placed in possession. The defendant later encroached on the land and erected a hut, prompting the plaintiff to sue for possession and mesne profits. The trial court and first …

SRI SHIVAJI BALARAM HAIBAITLversusSRI AVINASH MARUTHI PAWAR

2017 INSC 1126Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant purchased a shop and sued the respondent for possession, alleging the respondent occupied the shop without any right. The respondent denied the appellant's title and pleaded adverse possession, claiming long possession. The trial court and first appellate court held in favour of the …

SURESH KUMAR THROUGH GPAversusANIL KAKARIA & ORS.

2017 INSC 1077Dismissed

The appellant, Suresh Kumar, claimed that an agreement dated 24‑04‑1980 and a purported will of the original allottee, Ved Prakash Kakaria, entitled him to purchase a 114‑acre plot allotted by HUDA. After Kakaria's death, his heirs (respondents 1‑3) sold the land to respondent 4, prompting the …

NARENDRA & ORS.versusAJABRAO S/O NARAYAN KATARE (D) THROUGH LRS.

2017 INSC 1055Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs purchased a house in 1985 and sued the original defendant, who had been living in two rooms of the house even before the purchase, for a declaration of title and possession of the entire house. The trial court dismissed the suit, holding the defendant had acquired title by adverse …

SURESH KUMAR WADHWAversusSTATE OF M.P. & ORS.

2017 INSC 1052Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant participated in a public auction of four nazul plots and deposited a Rs.3 lakh security as required by the public notice. After his bid was accepted, the State officer sent a letter imposing four "special terms and conditions" which the appellant had not been informed of earlier, and …

LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIAversusSANJEEV BUILDERS PVT. LTD. AND ORS.

2017 INSC 1050Appeal(s) allowed

Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) filed a suit in 1986 for specific performance of a sale agreement. In 2014, Kedia Construction Company (respondent No.3) filed a Chamber Summons seeking to be impleaded as Plaintiff No.3, claiming assignment of the original plaintiff's interest, and the …

KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusPRADIP KUMAR GHOSH & OTHERS

2017 INSC 1045Appeal(s) allowed

The Kolkata Metropolitan Development Authority (KMDA) appealed against a Division Bench order that quashed its acquisition of a flat requisitioned under the West Bengal Land (Requisition and Acquisition) Act, 1948. The property had been under requisition since 1979 and the High Court, in 1993, …

SANTHINIversusVIJAYA VENKETESH

2017 INSC 1023Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined whether video conferencing could be used in matrimonial disputes under the Family Courts Act, 1984, particularly in transfer petitions. It held that Section 11 of the Act obliges the court to hold proceedings in camera if either party desires, and that allowing video …

PANKAJBHAI RAMESHBHAI ZALAVADIYAversusJETHABHAI KALABHAI ZALAVADIYA (DECEASED)

2017 INSC 989Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a suit in 2008 to cancel a 1995 sale deed of land that had been purchased by defendant No. 7, who had died before the suit was instituted. The trial court dismissed the appellant’s application to bring the deceased defendant’s legal representatives on record under Order 22 Rule …

SREI INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCE LIMITEDversusTUFF DRILLING PRIVATE LIMITED

2017 INSC 967Dismissed

The dispute arose when an arbitrator, appointed with the parties' consent, terminated the arbitration under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 because the claimant failed to file a statement of claim within the time prescribed under Section 23(1). The claimant later filed an …

DHARAMPAL (DEAD) THR. LRS.versusPUNJAB WAKF BOARD & ORS.

2017 INSC 899Dismissed

The Punjab Wakf Board sued Dharampal (deceased) and others for possession of land it owned. Dharampal's heirs claimed title by adverse possession, asserting continuous possession since 1953 through his father. The lower courts initially upheld the board's claim, rejecting the adverse possession …

MANOJ KUMAR ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ETC. ETC.

2017 INSC 1297Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined appeals arising from the acquisition of 561.38 acres in Haryana where the High Court had fixed compensation at Rs.1.46 crore per acre by applying a 15% cumulative annual increase and relying heavily on the Swaran Singh judgment. The Court held that such reliance was …

STATE OF UTTARAKHAND & ANR.versusMANDIR SRI LAXMAN SIDH MAHARAJ

2017 INSC 886Appeal(s) allowed

Bharat Bhushan Bharti, calling himself the Mahant and Manager of the ancient Sri Laxman Sidh Maharaj temple, filed a civil suit seeking a declaration of ownership over the temple and its surrounding five‑acre land and a permanent injunction restraining the State and the Divisional Forest Officer …

AMARDEEP SINGHversusHARVEEN KAUR

2017 INSC 896Disposed off

Amardeep Singh filed a civil appeal challenging the Family Court's order granting a waiver of the six‑month cooling‑off period under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, for a mutual‑consent divorce. The parties had been living separately for over eight years, had settled all pending …

VIJAY SINGHversusSHANTI DEVI AND ANR.

2017 INSC 874Dismissed

Vijay Singh, a co‑sharer, filed a pre‑emption suit against Shanti Devi after a sale of jointly owned land. An ex‑parte decree was passed in his favour in 1990, but the decree was later set aside on the ground that the defendant had not been properly served. The amendment to Section 15 of the Punjab …

BHARGAVI CONSTRUCTIONS & ANR.versusKOTHAKAPU MUTHYAM REDDY & ORS .

2017 INSC 867Appeal(s) allowed

Bhargavi Constructions filed a civil suit for specific performance of a land sale, which was later settled by a written compromise and an award was passed by a Lok Adalat on 22‑08‑2007. The plaintiffs later alleged fraud and misrepresentation in obtaining that award and instituted a suit seeking its …

S. N. D. P. SAKHAYOGAMversusKERALA ATMAVIDYA SANGHAM

2017 INSC 853Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, a charitable society, filed a suit against another society and a person seeking a declaration that a sale deed concerning a piece of land was void. The plaintiff applied to the trial court for permission to prosecute the suit in a representative capacity under Order I Rule 8 of the …

MAHARAJA AMRINDER SINGHversusTHE COMMISSIONER OF WEALTH TAX

2017 INSC 852Appeal(s) allowed

Maharaja Amrinder Singh, a wealth‑tax assessee, challenged the High Court’s order that set aside the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal’s decision in his favour and restored a penalty assessment for the years 1981‑84. The revenue had appealed to the High Court under Section 27‑A of the Wealth Tax Act, …

SAMAR KUMAR ROY (D) THROUGH LR (MOTHER)versusJHARNA BERA

2017 INSC 860Disposed off

Samar Kumar Roy filed a suit under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 (and Section 38 for injunction) seeking a declaration that his alleged marriage under the Special Marriage Act was void. The plaintiff died during the proceedings and his mother was substituted as his legal representative …

M/S RAPTAKOS, BRETT & CO. LTD.versusM/S GANESH PROPERTY

2017 INSC 857Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, MIS Rapta­kos, Brett & Co. Ltd., occupied premises leased to it until 1985. The respondent, Mis Ganesh Property, sued for possession and mesne profits in 1986; the court decreed possession in its favour but declined the mesne‑profit claim because the respondent did not press it. …

SIDDALINGAYYAversusGURI. LINGAPPA & ORS.

2017 INSC 855Dismissed

Siddalingayya sued the respondents for Rs 45,000 damages alleging illegal demolition of his construction. The respondents failed to file a written statement within the time fixed, and the trial court refused to extend the deadline, proceeding to decree in favour of the plaintiff. The respondents …

APPARAJU MALHAR RAOversusTULA VENKATAIAH@ VENKAT RAO (DEAD) & ORS.

2017 INSC 842Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a suit for perpetual injunction over a parcel of land, which the trial court decreed in his favour. The defendants successfully appealed, and the first appellate court set aside the trial court decree. The plaintiff then filed a second appeal before the High Court, which restored …

BUOY SINHA ROY (D) BY LR.versusBISWANATH DAS & ORS.

2017 INSC 826Disposed off

The appellant's wife died after a hysterectomy performed at a nursing home that lacked ICU facilities, despite her having uncontrolled high blood pressure and severe anemia. The appellant filed a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 alleging medical negligence for proceeding with …

RAM CHAND (DECEASED) THROUGH L.RS. & ORS.versusUDAI SINGH@ DAYA RAM & ORS.

2017 INSC 802Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, represented by his legal heirs, sued the defendants for ownership and possession of agricultural land, claiming inheritance rights, while the defendants relied on a will. The trial court granted only symbolic possession to the plaintiff, and both parties appealed. The High Court …

KANAILAL & ORS.versusRAM CHANDRA SINGH & ORS.

2017 INSC 792Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants (defendants) challenged a summary dismissal of their second appeal by the Calcutta High Court, which had been filed against a decree granting partition to the plaintiffs. The High Court dismissed the appeal under Order 41 Rule 11 without stating facts, the parties' submissions, or …

RAMATHALversusMARUTHATHAL & ORS.

2017 INSC 790Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant (buyer) entered into a sale agreement where the seller was obliged to conduct a survey of the land before payment was due. The seller failed to conduct the survey, prompting the buyer to sue for specific performance. The trial court and the first appellate court both decreed specific …

SEJAL GLASS LTD.versusNAVILAN MERCHANTS PVT. LTD.

2017 INSC 783Disposed off

Sejal Glass Ltd. filed a civil suit seeking a money decree and recovery of TDS from Navilan Merchants Pvt. Ltd. and its directors. The defendants moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC, claiming the plaint disclosed no cause of action against the directors and seeking bifurcation of …

THE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.versusMODERN TENT HOUSE & ANR.

2017 INSC 747Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar filed a money suit seeking Rs 41,59,418 against Modern Tent House and others. The defendants denied the claim in their written statement and later applied under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 to amend the statement by adding two paragraphs that merely …

LEKH RAJ (DEAD) THROUGH L.RS. & ORS.versusRANJIT SINGH & ORS.

2017 INSC 746Dismissed

The appellants filed a suit in 1962 seeking a declaration of customary rights over agricultural land under the Punjab Custom (Power to Contest) Act, 1920. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the appellate court in 1965 decreed in favour of the respondents, and the decree became final as no …

TERAPALLI DYVASAHATA KUMARversusS.M. KANTHA RAJU (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.

2017 INSC 748Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Terapalli Dyvasahata Kumar, filed a petition under Section 23 of the Andhra Pradesh Societies Registration Act, 2001, seeking declarations and injunctions concerning the management of a society. The District Court allowed the petition, holding that "District Court concerned" should be …

M/S MISRA AND CO.versusDAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION

2017 INSC 751Hearing Adjourned

MIS Misra & Co. was awarded Rs.5,78,873 by an arbitrator in 1988 for a construction contract with Damodar Valley Corporation (DVC). The Civil Court made the award a decree on 16 March 1991, but DVC neither paid nor appealed, and due to repeated objections the formal decree was only prepared on 21 …

J. VASANTHI & ORS.versusN. RAMAN! KANTHAMMAL (D) REP. BY LRS. & ORS.

2017 INSC 731Appeal(s) allowed

The original plaintiff, J. Vasanti & Ors., filed a suit seeking a declaration that several sale deeds relating to her inherited property were null and void and also sought a permanent injunction. The defendants argued that the plaintiff, being a party to the sale deeds, was effectively seeking …

SANTHINIversusVJJAYA VENKETESH

2017 INSC 730Matter referred to larger bench

The petitioner sought transfer of a divorce and child‑custody petition from the Family Court in Alappuzha, Kerala to the Family Court in Chennai, Tamil Nadu. The respondent argued that, following the Supreme Court’s decision in Krishna Veni Nagam, the matters could be dealt with via …

U. MANJUNATH RAOversusU. CHANDRASHEKAR & ANR.

2017 INSC 708Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant challenged a Karnataka High Court judgment that dismissed a first appeal against a trial court order directing rectification of a partition deed. The High Court had merely reproduced portions of the trial court judgment and quoted documents without analysing the evidence or addressing …

RAJA VENKATESWARLU & ANR.versusMADA VENKATA SUBBAIAB & ANR.

2017 INSC 689Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants obtained a final decree for a permanent injunction and applied to the Execution Court for its enforcement, seeking police protection under Section 151 of the CPC. The Execution Court granted the protection, but the High Court set aside the order, holding that the application should …

JASWANT SINGH & ORSversusPARK.ASH KAUR & ANR

2017 INSC 656Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff obtained an ex‑parte decree for specific performance of a 1995 agreement. The defendant filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC to set aside the decree, but it was dismissed in default and the defendant died shortly thereafter. The legal heirs filed a restoration application …

LALDHARI MISTRI (DEAD) THR. LRS. & ANR.versusVIJAY KUMAR

2017 INSC 611Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved a residential house in Munger, Bihar, owned by Hira Mistry, whose eviction decree against tenant Surendra Narayan Sinha was eventually reversed. An agreement to sell the house to Vijay Kumar was executed in 1983 while eviction proceedings were pending, leading to a …

ALKA CHANDEWARversusSHAMSHUL ISHRAR KHAN

2017 INSC 593Appeal(s) allowed

The sole arbitrator, on 7 October 2010, issued an interim order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 prohibiting the disposal of any flats without its leave. The respondent transferred five flats on 14 October 2010, breaching that order, and the arbitrator later found the …

ASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.versusBUILDWORTH PVT. LTD.

2017 INSC 587Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined an arbitral award granting Buildworth Pvt. Ltd. price‑escalation, idling‑charges and interest against Assam State Electricity Board. The Board argued that the award exceeded the contractual ceiling for escalation, ignored the claimant’s contributory delay, and that …

JASPAL KAUR CHEEMA AND ANR.versusM/S INDUSTRIAL TRADE LINKS AND ORS. ETC.

2017 INSC 584Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed an eviction petition under Section 13 of the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, claiming personal necessity for premises they alleged they owned and had leased to the respondents. During the trial the respondents sought to amend their written statement to deny the …

NITHYA ANAND RAGHAVANversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

2017 INSC 1295Appeal(s) allowed

The mother, Nithya Anand Raghavan, removed her seven‑year‑old daughter Nethra from the United Kingdom to India and the father filed a writ of habeas corpus in Delhi seeking the child's production and compliance with a UK court order directing her return. The Delhi High Court ordered the mother to …

D. N. JOSHI (D) THR. LRS. & OTHERSversusD. C. HARRIS & ANOTHER

2017 INSC 578Dismissed

The appeal concerned a suit for eviction filed by D.C. Harris (respondent) against tenants D.N. Joshi and others (appellants) who challenged the respondents' title to the premises. The title derived from a 1949 gift deed by Akhtari Begum to her brother Zamir Ahmad, followed by a 1965 sale deed to …

K. S. VARGHESE & ORS.versusST. PETERS & PAULS SYRIAN ORTH. & ORS.

2017 INSC 580Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals concerning the administration of Parish Churches within the Malankara Church, which has been divided between the Patriarch faction and the Catholicos faction. The core dispute was whether the 1934 Constitution of the Malankara Church or individual Udampady …

ALLOKAM PEDDABBAYYA AND ANOTHERversusALLAHABAD BANK AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 481Dismissed

Allokam Peddabbayya and another bought a property in 1985 that was under an equitable mortgage created in 1979 by Defendants 3 and 4 in favour of Allahabad Bank. The bank foreclosed on the loan, obtained a decree in 1991 and the property was auctioned in 1993, with a sale certificate issued to the …

STATE BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.versusKINGFISHER AIRLINES LTD. AND ORS.

2017 INSC 462Hearing Adjourned

The consortium of banks sought recovery of large debts from respondents, including guarantor Respondent No.3, who received US$40 million and was ordered by the Supreme Court on 7 April 2016 to disclose all assets. Respondent No.3 failed to disclose the overseas account used for the transfer and …

VAISHALI ABHIMANYU JOSHIversusNANASAHEB GOPAL JOSHI

2017 INSC 459Appeal(s) allowed

The father‑in‑law filed a suit in the Judge, Small Causes Court seeking possession of a flat, claiming he was the licensor and the daughter‑in‑law a gratuitous licensee. The daughter‑in‑law filed a counter‑claim for a residence order under Section 19 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence …

CHILAMKURTI BALA SUBRAHMANYAMversusSAMANTHAPUDI VIJAYA LAKSHMI & ANR.

2017 INSC 427Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an auction purchaser, bought a schedule property attached in execution of a decree for a loan granted by State Bank of India to the judgment debtor, Samanthapudi Vijaya Lakshmi. The property was proclaimed for sale on 5 October 1999, a 15‑day notice was issued, and the auction was …

GURNAM SINGH (D) THR. LRS.versusGURBACHAN KAUR (D) BY LRS. & ORS.

2017 INSC 405Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined a second appeal in which the original appellant and two respondents had died during its pendency. No application under Order XXII Rules 3(2) and 4(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was filed to substitute their legal representatives within the prescribed 90‑day …

J. BALAJI SINGHversusDIWAKAR COLE & ORS.

2017 INSC 386Appeal(s) allowed

Balaji Singh filed a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction which was dismissed by the trial court. On appeal, the first appellate court allowed him to file additional evidence under Order 41 Rule 27, set aside the trial court decree and remanded the case to the trial court for a …

KALYAN DEY CHOWDHURYversusRITA DEY CHOWDHURY NEE NANDY

2017 INSC 370Case Partly allowed

The husband Kalyan Dey Chowdhury and his wife Rita Dey Chowdhury (née Nandy) were married in 1995 and later divorced. The wife sought permanent alimony under Section 25 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which was initially set at Rs.16,000 per month in 2015. The husband’s net salary rose from Rs.63,842 to …

MADANURI SRI RAMA CHANDRA MURTHYversusSYED JALAL

2017 INSC 366Appeal(s) allowed

Madanuri Sri Rama Chandra Murthy filed a suit seeking cancellation of a sale deed, alleging that the land was Wakf property. The defendants moved an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC for rejection of the plaint, which the Wakf Tribunal allowed, finding the suit meritless and barred. The …

VELAYUDHAN & ORS.versusMOHAMMEDKUTTY & ORS.

2017 INSC 359Case Partly allowed

The respondents filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction and, by implication, a declaration of title over certain land. The trial court decreed in their favour, but the first appellate court dismissed the suit. On second appeal, the High Court held the suit was only for a perpetual …

AYAN CHATTERJEEversusFUTURE TECHNOLOGY FOUNDATION INC. & ORS.

2017 INSC 358Disposed off

The plaintiff filed a civil suit seeking declaration of tenancy and a permanent injunction, and during the suit applied for a temporary injunction under Order 39 of the CPC. The trial court granted the injunction, directing a status‑quo and finding the plaintiff prima facie in possession. On appeal, …

DAGADABAI (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusABBAS @ GULAB RUSTUM PINJARI

2017 INSC 360Appeal(s) allowed

Dagadabai, the heir of the deceased Muslim landowner Rustum, filed a suit for possession of agricultural land against Abbas who claimed to be Rustum's adopted son and also pleaded adverse possession. The trial court and the first appellate court held that adoption is not recognized under Mohammedan …

M/S UNICHEM LABORATORIES LTD.versusRANI DEVI & ANR.

2017 INSC 361Appeal(s) allowed

Mis Unichem Laboratories Ltd., a company that provided housing to its industrial workers under the Uttar Pradesh Industrial Housing Act, 1955, sought eviction of Rani Devi and others who continued to occupy a quarter after the original allottee, Dharam Dev Yadav, retired and later died. The company …

POWER MACHINES INDIA LIMITEDversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2017 INSC 355Dismissed

Power Machines India Ltd obtained an arbitral award under the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 directing it to pay a sum to Lakshmi Engineering Industries. The State of Madhya Pradesh, invoking Rule 5 of the Madhya Pradesh MSME Facilitation Council Rules, 2006, sought …

VIPULBHAI MANSINGBHAI CHAUDHARYversusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ANOTHER

2017 INSC 354Disposed off

Vipulbhai Mansingbhai Chaudhary, who continued as Chairman of a district cooperative milk union beyond his three‑year term, was served a show‑cause notice under s.76B(1) and (2) of the Gujarat Co‑operative Societies Act, 1961. The Registrar removed him and disqualified him for three years; a later …

M/S KAUSHIK COOP. BUILDING SOCIETYversusN. PARVATHAMMA & ORS.

2017 INSC 335Disposed off

The Kaushik Cooperative Building Society claimed ownership of land in Survey No.129/68 Paiki based on a 1976 decree in a specific‑performance suit (CCCA No.14 of 1972). Subsequent land‑grabbing suits (LGC Nos.46/1989, 29/1992, 15/1996) were dismissed, confirming the same title. Later, a new …

MRS. HEMA KHATTAR & ANR.versusSHIV KHERA

2017 INSC 324Appeal(s) allowed

The parties entered into a written construction contract on 06‑06‑2009 containing an arbitration clause. Disputes over construction quality led to a meeting where the contract was terminated by mutual consent and an oral agreement was made with the husband of the original contractor to supervise the …

HIMACHAL PRADESH FINANCIAL CORPORATIONversusANIL GARG AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 277Appeal(s) allowed

The Himachal Pradesh Financial Corporation (HPFC) sought recovery of two defaulted loans from Anil Garg and others. HPFC had earlier filed a money suit which was withdrawn in order to pursue faster recovery under the Himachal Pradesh Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1973. The respondent filed …

KARUNANIDHIversusSEETHARAMA NAIDU & ORS.

2017 INSC 272Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal arose from a suit filed in 1988 by the great‑grandson and great‑granddaughter of Perumal Naidu (plaintiffs) seeking declaration and possession of properties that had been bequeathed by their great‑grandmother Alamelu Ammal to her sister Ramanujatha Ammal (defendant). The plaintiffs …

MANTI DEVI & ANR.versusKISHUN SAH @ KISHUN DEO SAO & ORS.

2017 INSC 261Appeal(s) allowed

Manti Devi and her son filed an eviction suit in the Munsif Court seeking possession of two katras on the ground of personal necessity, claiming to be landlords after purchasing the property. The trial court decreed eviction in their favour. The tenants appealed to the High Court in revision, which …

T. RAVI & ANR.versusB. CHINNA NARASIMHA & ORS. ETC.

2017 INSC 242Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a long‑standing partition suit over the matruka property of the late Nawab Jung, in which Defendant No.1 (Hamid Ali Khan) sold his share of 68 acres 10 guntas to Bala Mallaiah on 23‑Nov‑1959. The sale was challenged on the grounds that it was made during the pendency of the …

M/S. BRAKEWEL AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.versusP. R. SELVAM ALAGAPPAN

2017 INSC 248Appeal(s) allowed

M/S. Brakewel Automotive Components (India) Pvt. Ltd. obtained a decree for recovery of a sum of money from P.R. Selvam Alagappan. The respondent filed an application under Section 47 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the executability of the decree on grounds of alleged mis‑joinder …

KRISHNA VENI NAGAMversusHARISH NAGAM

2017 INSC 224Disposed off

The wife, residing in Hyderabad with her minor daughter, sought transfer of a divorce proceeding filed by her husband under Section 13 of the Hindu Marriage Act in the Family Court of Jabalpur, citing hardship in traveling to the forum. The petition raised whether a transfer under Section 25 of the …

FARIDABAD COMPLEX ADMINISTRATIONversusM/S IRON MASTER INDIA (P) LTD.

2017 INSC 204Appeal(s) allowed

The municipal corporation (Faridabad Complex Administration) appealed to the Supreme Court against the High Court of Punjab and Haryana's dismissal of its second appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The corporation sought to overturn a decree that had upheld a suit filed by …

MOHAN KUMARversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH & ORS.

2017 INSC 205

Mohan Kumar purchased land in 1941 and later the State and municipal authorities constructed temples, latrines and other structures on it. The Collector ordered removal of the encroachments and suggested allotting alternate land, but the valuation of the appellant’s land (Rs 150 per sq m) was lower …

MRS. A. KANTHAMANIversusMRS. NASREEN AHMED

2017 INSC 202Dismissed

The appellant, owner of a Chennai property, entered into a sale agreement with the respondent on 5 March 1989, received more than 50% of the purchase price and promised to execute the sale deed by 31 December 1989. The appellant later refused to execute the deed, prompting the respondent to file a …

SASI (D) THROUGH LRS. ·versusARAVINDAKSHAN NARI AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 201Dismissed

The Supreme Court dismissed a Special Leave Petition filed by SASI (D) through LRS against orders of the Kerala High Court that dismissed a second appeal (9 March 2012) and a review petition (26 October 2016). The review petition, filed on 20 September 2012, was barred by limitation and remained …

SWAMI SHIVSHANKARGIRI CHELLA SWAMI & ANR.versusSATYA GYAN NIKETAN& ANR.

2017 INSC 174Disposed off

The dispute concerned a property waqfed in 1940 by Swami Satya Dev to Respondent No.2 (Prachaarini Sabha) for the purpose of promoting Hindi language, establishing a library and other charitable activities, subject to conditions prohibiting sale or mortgage. The appellants, interested in ensuring …

SATISH KUMAR GUPTA ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF HARYANA & ORS. ETC.

2017 INSC 166Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana acquired large tracts of land for an industrial model township, vesting the land in the State after the Collector’s award. The Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation (HSIDC) later allotted part of this land to Maruti Suzuki India Ltd (MSIL) under a deed that required …

JAYANTILAL CHIMANLAL PATELversusVADILAL PURUSHOTTAMDAS PATEL

2017 INSC 160Disposed off

The appellant-landlord filed a suit in 1992 seeking a permanent injunction against the tenant for constructing a permanent structure without consent, invoking Section 13(b) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The trial court partially decreed the suit, but the High …

JAYAKANTHAM & OTHERSversusABAYKUMAR

2017 INSC 161Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants entered into an agreement to sell a residential property to the respondent for Rs 1.60 lakh, receiving Rs 60,000 as advance, with the balance to be paid on execution of the sale deed. The deed was not executed within the stipulated period and the respondent sued for specific …

BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON LONDON BRANCHversusZENITH INFOTECH LIMITED

2017 INSC 165Disposed off

Zenith Infotech Ltd filed a reference under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 before the Board for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (BIFR). The Registrar of the Board refused to register the reference on the ground that the company was not an "industrial company" …

PRABHAKARA ADIGAversusGOWRI & ORS.

2017 INSC 159Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff obtained a decree for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering with his immovable property. The judgment‑debtor died shortly thereafter, and his heirs attempted to dispossess the plaintiff, prompting the plaintiff to file an execution petition. The issue before …

SK. BHIKAN S/O SK NOOR MOHD.versusMEHAMOODABEE W/O SK. AFZAL & ORS.

2017 INSC 157Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute involved a brother (appellant) and his sister (plaintiff) over ownership of a family property in Aurangabad. The sister claimed inheritance under Mohammedan law, while the brother asserted that the property was self‑acquired through a registered sale deed and adverse possession. The …

NIDHI KAIM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS

2017 INSC 131Dismissed

The appellants were admitted to MBBS courses in Madhya Pradesh through a systematic fraud involving computer manipulation, roll‑number tampering and assistance from meritorious candidates. Vyapam cancelled their admissions, a decision upheld by the High Court and earlier by this Court. The …

M/S CHAKRESHWARI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.versusMANOHAR LAL

2017 INSC 1263Appeal(s) allowed

M/s Chakreshwari Construction Pvt. Ltd., the owner of a shop leased to Manohar Lal, filed an eviction petition under the Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001 alleging subletting and lack of alternative accommodation. After the trial evidence was closed, the appellant sought to amend the petition under …

RICHARD LEEversusGIRISH SONI AND ANR.

2017 INSC 100Disposed off

The respondents filed an eviction petition before the Delhi Rent Controller seeking to evict the occupants of a shop. The appellant, Richard Lee, claimed to be a partner in the firm K.K. Lee, which he alleged was the actual tenant, and moved an application for impleadment as a necessary party under …

BITHIKA MAZUMDAR AND ANR.versusSAGAR PAL AND ORS.

2017 INSC 95Disposed off

Gautam Mazumdar died in a road accident in 2007, and his widow and minor daughter filed a compensation claim before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT). MACT dismissed the claim for lack of territorial jurisdiction and the review petition was also dismissed. The appellants then filed a …

AMBADAS KHANDUJI SHINDE & ORS.versusASHOK SADASHIV MAMURKAR & ORS.

2017 INSC 82Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords filed a suit for recovery of possession of a shop on the ground of bona‑fide need to start a kirana business for their unemployed sons, alleging willful default and change of usage by the tenants. The trial court and the first appellate court upheld the landlords' claim, finding a …

NEW OKHLA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusHARKISHAN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & ORS.

2017 INSC 76Appeal(s) allowed

The New Okhla Industrial Development Authority acquired land of several owners in 1990‑1992 using the urgency provision of Section 17 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The owners challenged the acquisition in the High Court, which dismissed their writ petitions, and the Supreme Court upheld the …

KULDEEP SINGH PATHANIAversusBIKRAM SINGH JARYAL

2017 INSC 73Appeal(s) allowed

Kuldeep Singh Pathania, who lost a 2012 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election, filed an election petition under Section 100(1)(d)(iii) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951 alleging irregularities in voting and postal ballots. The Himachal Pradesh High Court dismissed the petition …

V. RAJENDRAN AND ANR.versusANNASAMY PANDLAN (D) THR. LRS. KARTHYAYANL NATCHIAR

2017 INSC 1257Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants filed a suit for permanent injunction in 2004 describing the suit property as Survey No.192/9. During the trial they discovered that the respondents had transferred the patta and executed an Inam Settlement Deed referring to the same land as Survey No.192/14, creating a confusion …

UNITED FINANCE CORPORATIONversusM.S.M. HANEEFA

2017 INSC 45Appeal(s) allowed

United Finance Corporation, the decree‑holder, purchased a property at a court auction and sought delivery of possession under Order XXI Rule 95 of the CPC. The judgment‑debtor filed applications to set aside the sale and obtained a stay of execution, which was later dismissed on 9 July 2003. The …

HARJAS RAL MAKHIJA (D) THR. LRS.versusPUSHPARANI JAIN & ANR.

2017 INSC 7Dismissed

Harjas Rai Makhija appealed to the Supreme Court alleging that the decree of 4 October 1999, which granted possession of a Bhopal plot to Pushparani Jain, was obtained by fraud because she allegedly concealed a Power of Attorney dated 30 April 1983. The Court held that fraud must be proved with …

LALITESHWAR PRASAD SINGH & ORS.versusS. P. SRIVASTAVA (D) THR. LRS.

2016 INSC 1147Remitted to Lower Court

The plaintiff Shailendra Prasad Srivastava filed a suit for declaration of title over certain lands against Baidya Nath Prasad Verma, which the trial court dismissed. The High Court, acting as the first appellate court, reversed the trial court's decision and decreed in favour of the plaintiff, but …

M/S ALCON ELECTRONICS PVT. LTD.versusCELEM S.A. OF FOS 34320 ROUJAN, FRANCE & ANR.

2016 INSC 1120Dismissed

The appellant, Alcon Electronics, challenged the execution in India of an English Court order that dismissed its jurisdictional plea and ordered it to pay costs of £12,229.75. The central question was whether such an interlocutory order is a conclusive foreign judgment under Section 13 of the CPC …

ROBUST HOTELS PVT. LTD. & ORS.versusEIH LIMITED & ORS.

2016 INSC 1107Disposed off

EIH Ltd. entered into a Technical Services Agreement with Balaji Hotels (BHEL) for operating a hotel, and paid Rs 15.21 crore as financial accommodation. BHEL later obtained financial assistance from IFCI and TFCI, which sold the hotel unit to Robust Hotels under SARFAESI proceedings despite an …

BISMILLAH BE (DEAD) BY LRS.versusMAJEED SHAH

2016 INSC 1073Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a co‑owner of a house in Jabalpur, proved her title to the suit property through a series of registered sale and partition deeds and served a quit notice on the respondent, who had been a tenant of the original owner, Rai Bahadur Motiram Mathuradas. The respondent denied any …

MAHANAGAR TELEPHONE NIGAM LTD.versusM/S. APPLIED ELECTRONICS LTD.

2016 INSC 1059Directions issued

Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. appealed a Delhi High Court order that had held the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) applicable to an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and had entertained a cross‑objection under Order XLII Rule 22 CPC. The Supreme Court examined …

IDBI TRUSTEESHIP SERVICES LTD.versusHUBTOWN LTD.

2016 INSC 1027Appeal(s) allowed

The appeal arose from a summary suit filed by IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd., a debenture trustee, to enforce an unconditional corporate guarantee issued by Hubtown Ltd. (formerly Ackruti City Ltd.) on behalf of its subsidiary Vinca. The plaintiff alleged defaults on debentures issued by Amazia and …

STATE BANK OF PATIALAversusMUKESH JAIN & ANR.

2016 INSC 1007Appeal(s) allowed

The State Bank of Patiala had advanced a term loan of Rs.8 lakh to Mukesh Jain, who defaulted and the bank invoked the SARFAESI Act, issuing a notice under Section 13(2). Jain challenged the SARFAESI proceedings by filing a civil suit, prompting the bank to move an application under Order VII Rule …

NAVJOT SINGH SIDHUversusOM PARKASH SONI & ORS.

2016 INSC 990Case Partly allowed

The 2009 Lok Sabha election for Amritsar was challenged in an election petition alleging three categories of corrupt practice: excess election expenditure on newspaper advertisements, excessive spending on public meetings, and assistance from a gazetted officer, along with a grievance about the …

RAJENDER BANSAL & ORS.versusBHURU (D) THR. LRS. & ORS.

2016 INSC 972Appeal(s) allowed

The landlords filed a civil suit for eviction of tenants occupying a shop in a rural area of Haryana, which at the time of filing was not covered by the Haryana Urban (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1973. While the suit was pending, a municipal notification brought the area within the urban …

SYEDA RAHIMUNNISAversusMALAN BL (DEAD) BY L.RS. & ANR. ETC.

2016 INSC 938Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, Syeda Rahimunnisa and Syed Hyder Hussaini, sued the respondents (legal heirs of Haji Mian) for eviction and damages, asserting a landlord‑tenant relationship. The respondents counter‑claimed title to the land by adverse possession and filed three related suits. The trial court and …

RAJENDRA KUMAR MESHRAMversusVANSHMANI PRASAD VERMA AND ANR.

2016 INSC 942Appeal(s) allowed

Rajendra Kumar Meshram was elected to the Madhya Pradesh Legislative Assembly from the Deosar constituency. A petition was filed by the opposing candidate alleging that Meshram's nomination was improperly accepted because he failed to furnish the electoral roll of the constituency where he was a …

ARUN DEV UPADHYAYAversusINTEGRATED SALES SERVICE LTD & ANR.

2016 INSC 1203Dismissed

Arun Dev Upadhyaya appealed against a judgment of the Single Judge of the Bombay High Court that enforced an international arbitration award against one of the respondents but not the other. The appeal raised the question of whether a Letters Patent appeal could be filed before the Division Bench …

NAGARPALIKA THAKURDWARAversusKHALIL AHMED & ORS.

2016 INSC 925Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents, claiming to reside outside the limits of Nagar Palika Thakurdwara, filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction, a declaration that they were not liable to pay house tax, and recovery of a modest tax amount of about Rs 11,006.07. The trial court dismissed the suit; the first …

M/S SHANTI CONDUCTORS (P) LTD. ANR.versusASSAM STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD & ORS.

2019 INSC 81Matter referred to larger bench

The Supreme Court examined whether the Interest on Delayed Payments to Small Scale and Ancillary Industrial Undertakings Act, 1993 (the 1993 Act) applies retrospectively to supply orders placed before its commencement on 23‑09‑1992. The Court held that the Act is prospective, its liability arising …

AJAY ARJUN SINGHversusSHARADENDU TIWARI & OTHERS

2016 INSC 1194Case Partly allowed

The appellant, a returned MLA, challenged an election petition alleging corrupt practices and excess expenditure under the Representation of the People Act, 1951. He filed an application under Order VI Rule 16 of the CPC seeking to strike out several paragraphs of the petition as frivolous, …

MADINA BEGUM & ANR.versusSHIV MURTI PRASAD PANDEY & ORS.

2016 INSC 567Transferred to High Court

Madina Begum filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement that lacked a fixed calendar date for completion. The respondents contended the suit was barred by the three‑year limitation under Article 54 of Schedule I of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Supreme Court held that where no …

GAYATHRIversusM. GIRISH

2016 INSC 1189Dismissed

The plaintiff, a septuagenarian, filed a suit in 2007 for possession and damages. The trial proceeded with a prolonged examination-in-chief and the defendant repeatedly sought adjournments under Order XVII Rules 1 and 2, filing more than a dozen interlocutory applications on flimsy grounds, many of …

COMMISSIONER, M.P. HOUSING BOARD AND OTHERSversusM/S. MOHANLAL AND COMPANY

2016 INSC 1187Appeal(s) allowed

The parties entered into a construction contract containing an arbitration clause, and an award was rendered on 11 November 2010. The respondent later filed a Section 11 application in the High Court seeking appointment of an arbitrator, claiming the clause was invalid; the application was …

ANITA KUSHWAHAversusPUSHAP SUDAN

2016 INSC 1186Directions issued

The Supreme Court was asked to decide whether it can transfer civil or criminal proceedings pending in any court of Jammu and Kashmir to a court outside the State and vice‑versa, despite the fact that Sections 25 of the CPC and 406 of the CrPC do not apply to Jammu and Kashmir and the State codes …

M/S. NORTHERN COALFIELD LTD.versusHEAVY ENGINEERING CORP. LTD. & ANR.

2016 INSC 518Appeal(s) allowed

Northern Coalfield Ltd., a government-owned corporation, entered into two contracts with Heavy Engineering Corp. Ltd. which contained an arbitration clause. Disputes were referred to the Government's "permanent machinery of arbitration" and awards were made, which Northern Coalfield challenged …

AJAY GUPTAversusRAJU @ RAJENDRA SINGH YADAV

2016 INSC 499Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff was required to file a suit by 31 December 2010, the last day of the court's winter vacation. 1 January 2011, a Saturday, was a non‑working day for judges but the registry remained open. The suit was filed on 3 January 2011. The trial court and the High Court held that the filing was …

R.K. ROJAversusU.S. RAYUDU AND ANOTHER

2016 INSC 491

R.K. Roja was elected to the Nagiri Assembly Constituency and a respondent filed an election petition challenging her election. The appellant filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the CPC to have the petition rejected, first as a counter‑affidavit and later as a formal application. The …

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.versusDILER SINGH

2016 INSC 479Appeal(s) allowed

Constable Oiler Singh of the CRPF left his camp without permission, consumed alcohol and quarrelled with civilians. The disciplinary authority dismissed him under Section 11(1) of the Central Reserve Police Force Act, 1949. Singh filed a civil suit seeking a declaration that the dismissal was …

HARYANA STATE & ANR.versusGRAM PANCHAYAT VILLAGE KALEHRI

2016 INSC 451Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana filed a second appeal against a judgment that declared a Gram Panchayat the owner of a 36-kanal piece of land. The High Court dismissed the appeal in limine, holding that it did not raise a substantial question of law under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The Supreme …

UNION OF INDIAversusK.V. LAKSHMAN & ORS.

2016 INSC 443Remitted to Lower Court

The Union of India filed a title suit claiming ownership of a plot of land, which the trial court dismissed on limitation and lack of evidence. The Union appealed under Section 96 of the CPC, also seeking to file additional evidence via Order 41 Rule 27, but the High Court dismissed the appeal in …

M/S UMESH GOELversusHIMACHAL PRADESH COOPERATIVE GROUP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.

2016 INSC 457Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, an unregistered partnership firm, entered into a construction contract with the respondent and later contested the respondent's claim in arbitration. The respondent argued that Section 69(3) of the Partnership Act, 1932 barred the firm from participating in arbitral proceedings …

VOHRA SADIKBHAI RAJAKBHAI & ORS.versusSTATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

2016 INSC 398Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of agricultural land adjacent to the Mazum dam, claimed compensation for loss of fruit‑bearing trees after the State of Gujarat released 60,000 cusecs of water from the dam during heavy monsoon rains. The respondents argued that the release was necessitated by an act of God …

SATYENDRA KUMAR & ORS.versusRAJ NATH DUBEY & ORS.

2016 INSC 388Dismissed

The appeal concerned a land‑inheritance dispute where the petitioners sought to set aside an order of the Consolidation Officer that rejected their claim to a share of land. The petitioners argued that earlier judgments in a separate proceeding involving the same parties, but concerning a different …

MUDDASANI SAROJANAversusMUDDASANI SAROJANA

2016 INSC 373Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff purchased a property from Buchamma, the sole surviving sister of the deceased Balaiah, under a registered sale deed dated 25‑04‑1981. After the widow Yashoda's death, the plaintiff took possession, but Defendant No.3 (Sarojana) evicted him, claiming to be Yashoda's adopted daughter and …

MESSER HOLDINGS LTD.versusSHYAM MADANMOHAN RUIA & OTHERS

2016 INSC 326Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined multiple Special Leave Petitions (SLPs) arising from a protracted dispute over the acquisition and transfer of shares in Bombay Oxygen Corporation Ltd. The dispute involved Messer Holdings GmbH (MGG), Goyal Gases Ltd (GGL), the Ruia family (RUIAS) and a joint venture …

RISHABH CHAND JAIN & ANOTHERversusGINESH CHANDRA JAIN

2016 INSC 317Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff filed a suit seeking a declaration that a municipal survey Khatiyan was null and void. The defendants moved to frame a preliminary issue that the suit was barred by res judicata and that there was no cause of action. The trial court dismissed the suit on those grounds without formally …

KUSUM HARILAL SONIversusCHANDRLKA NANDLAL MEHTA AND ANR.

2016 INSC 310Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a landlord, obtained an eviction order and a decree for monthly compensation against the tenant (respondent No.1) under Section 13A(2) of the Bombay Rent Act, 1947. After possession was handed over, the tenant failed to pay the compensation and purportedly transferred the flat to her …

KEDAR MISHRAversusTHE STATE OF BIHAR & ORS.

2016 INSC 304

Kedar Mishra, a co‑sharer and raiyat, claimed right of pre‑emption under Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act for three parcels sold by his brother. He deposited the required ten percent of the purchase price, but the treasury challan …

RAGHAVENDRA SWAMY MUTTversusUTTARADI MUTT

2016 INSC 291

The appellant Raghavendra Swamy Mutt challenged an interim injunction granted by the Karnataka High Court in a dispute with Uttaradi Mutt over possession of a religious property. The High Court, without first admitting the second appeal under Section 100 of the CPC or formulating the required …

UNION OF INDIAversusM/S. AMBLCA CONSTRUCTION

2016 INSC 265Reference answered

The case concerned whether an arbitrator could award pendente lite interest when the underlying contract expressly barred interest on delayed payments. The dispute arose from a construction contract between the Union of India and M/s. Ambica Construction, which had undergone multiple arbitrations …

AJAY ARJUN SLNGHversusSHARADENDU TIWARI & OTHERS

2016 INSC 264Disposed off

The case concerned an election petition filed by Sharadendu Tiwari challenging the election of Ajay Arjun Singh. The dispute centered on whether the petition was accompanied by an affidavit in the statutory Form 25 as required by the proviso to Section 83(1)(c) of the Representation of the People …

STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusM/S. SHREYANS INDUS LTD. ETC.

2016 INSC 243Dismissed

The State of Punjab appealed against the High Court’s decision that the Commissioner of Excise and Taxation could not extend the three‑year limitation period for passing a sales‑tax assessment after that period had expired. The assessee, M/s Shreyans Indus Ltd., had filed returns for assessment …

VIJAY PRAKASH JARATHversusTEJ PRAKASHJARATH

2016 INSC 228Appeal(s) allowed

Tej Prakash Jarath filed a suit in 1992 against his relatives. The defendants filed written statements on 11 November 1992 and, after issues were framed in October 1993, filed a counter‑claim on 17 June 1996. The trial court allowed the counter‑claim, but the Uttarakhand High Court set it aside, …

NASIK MUNICIPAL CORP.versusM/S. R.M. BHANDARI & ANR.

2016 INSC 214Appeal(s) allowed

The Nasik Municipal Corporation sought restoration of an execution petition (Special Darkhast No.49 of 2002) on the condition that it deposit a cost of Rs.25,000, as ordered by the High Court. The executing court refused to accept the cost, holding that the time limit set by the High Court had …

NAGABHUSHANAMMAL (D) BY LRS.versusC. CHANDIKESWARAL!NGAM

2016 INSC 213Disposed off

Nagabhushanammal (deceased) filed a suit for partition of a family property in 1988. An earlier suit filed by her in 1962 for possession based on a settlement deed had been dismissed. The defendant argued that the 1988 suit was barred by res judicata and that his long possession amounted to adverse …

PANKAJAKSHI (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. & OTHERSversusCHANDRIKA & OTHERS

2016 INSC 212Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether Section 23 of the Travancore‑Cochin High Court Act, which provides that a Chief Justice must refer a matter to a third judge when two judges of a division bench disagree, survives the repealing provision of Section 9 of the Kerala High Court Act and whether it is a …

DHEERAJ DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITEDversusDR. OM PRAKASH GUPTA AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 204Appeal(s) allowed

Dheeraj Developers Private Limited filed a suit for specific performance of a sale deed of land against Dr. Om Prakash Gupta and others. The trial court dismissed the suit, but the High Court reversed the decision, granting specific performance solely on the basis that Exhibit P‑1, the alleged …

RAM RATIversusMANGE RAM (D) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

2016 INSC 206Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant and respondent were involved in two parallel suits concerning the same property, which were consolidated by the trial court. During the trial of one suit, a witness (PW‑I) was examined and the evidence was closed. After consolidation, the respondent filed an application under Order 18 …

U.P.S.R.T.C.versusKM. MAMTA & ORS

2016 INSC 164

The appellant corporation’s bus collided with a motorcyclist, leading to a claim for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The Motor Accident Claim Tribunal awarded Rs.24,73,252, which the corporation appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 173 of the Act. The High Court …

INDIAN MACHINERY COMPANYversusM/S. ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD.

2016 INSC 94

The appellant Indian Machinery Co. filed a second complaint before the District Forum under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 after its first complaint was dismissed for default. The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission held the second complaint non‑maintainable, invoking a rule analogous …

BUSSA OVERSEAS & PROPERTIES (P) LTD. & ANR.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2016 INSC 1164Dismissed

Bussa Overseas & Properties Ltd. sought a refund of excess provisional customs duty under Section 18(2) of the Customs Act, 1962. The customs authority directed the claim to be made under Section 27(2) and the appellants contested this, filing a writ petition. The High Court dismissed the writ and, …

DAMODAR LALversusSOHAN DEVI AND OTHERS

2016 INSC 8Appeal(s) allowed

The landlord, Damodar Lal, sought eviction of his tenants on the ground that they had made unauthorised structural alterations to the rented premises. Both the trial court and the first appellate court found that material alteration had occurred and dismissed the tenants’ appeal. The tenants …

SRI AUROBJNDO ASHRAM TRUST AND ORS.versusR. RAMANATHAN AND ORS.

2016 INSC 9Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed a suit under Section 92 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking removal of the trustees of the Sri Aurobindo Ashram Trust, alleging that the trustees failed to act against an objectionable biography of Sri Aurobindo. The High Court held the suit within the ambit of Section 92 …

LAL SHAH BABA DARGAH TRUSTversusMAGNUM DEVELOPERS AND OTHERS

2015 INSC 925Case Partly allowed

The Lal Shah Baba Dargah Trust filed a suit before the single‑member Maharashtra Waqf Tribunal seeking injunction against alleged illegal development of waqf property. The respondents obtained a civil revision, arguing that the 2013 Wakf (Amendment) Act, which mandates a three‑member tribunal, …

A. ANDISAMY CHETTIARversusA. SUBBURAJ CHETTIAR

2015 INSC 900Disposed off

The plaintiff filed a suit for permanent injunction over a disputed property and lost at trial. He appealed, and during the pendency of the appeal filed an application seeking scientific examination of a will's signature. The first appellate court allowed the application under Order 41 Rule 27, but …

NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD.versusHILLI MULTIPURPOSE COLD STORAGE PVT. LTD.

2015 INSC 890Reference answered

The appeal concerned the interpretation of Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 regarding the time allotted to the opposite party to file its version after a complaint is admitted. The petitioner argued that the 30‑day period could be extended beyond the statutory ceiling of 15 …

M/S. ADANI AGRI FRESH LTD.versusMAHABOOB SHARIF & ORS.

2015 INSC 883Disposed off

M/s Adani Agri Fresh Ltd. (appellant) supplied fruit to M/s RMS Fruits & Co. (respondent) and obtained three unconditional bank guarantees from State Bank of Mysore to secure payment. When the respondent failed to pay, the appellant invoked the guarantees, prompting the respondent to obtain a …

M/S COCHIN SHIPYARD LTD.versusM/S APEEJAY SHIPPING LTD.

2015 INSC 837Case Partly allowed

The parties entered into a contract for the construction of a cargo ship, which later gave rise to arbitration before a former Supreme Court judge who awarded in 2009. The respondent sought to set aside the award under Sections 30 and 33 of the Arbitration Act, 1940, alleging the arbitrator’s legal …