Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Code of Civil Procedure, 1908

4176 judgments · newest first · showing 3601–3800

M/S. C.S. COMPANY AND ORS.versusKERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD

1996 INSC 1246Dismissed

The petitioners filed a suit for settlement of accounts and a declaration that they were entitled to recover damages under a contract dated May 12, 1983. They later applied, under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC, to amend the plaint to convert the suit into a damages suit by quantifying the claimed …

M/S. MOTORS AND INVESTMENTS LTD.versusTHE NEW BANK OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1248Disposed off

Mis Motors and Investments Ltd. had purchased 44 acres of land at a court auction for Rs 77,500 after no other bids were received. The land belonged to insolvent respondents whose interest vested in the official assignee, who was directed to sell the property. On appeal, other respondents offered …

NINGE GOWDAversusLINGE GOWDA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1240Appeal(s) allowed

Ninge Gowda filed a suit for declaration of title and injunction, claiming that the land in dispute was ancestral property that had been partitioned among his father and his father's brothers before 1936, and subsequently partitioned again in 1936 between Ninge Gowda and his brothers, with a …

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.versusVIPINCHANDRA HIRALAL SHAH

1996 INSC 1224Disposed off

Vipin Chandra Hiralal Shah, a Gujarat Administrative Service officer, was omitted from the 1979 promotion list and thereafter no separate select lists were prepared for 1980‑85. In 1986‑87 a consolidated list covering vacancies from 1980‑86 was prepared, again excluding Shah. He challenged this …

MR. ANTHONY C. LEOversusNANDLAL BAL KRISHAN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1213Appeal(s) allowed

In a suit concerning the dissolution of a partnership, a receiver was appointed to preserve the disputed property, which included a restaurant premises occupied by the appellant, Anthony C. Leo, as a tenant. The receiver filed reports alleging that the tenant had made unauthorised constructions and …

DIVYA DIP SINGH AND ORS.versusRAM BACHAN MISHRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1215Dismissed

The father of three minor sons filed a title suit in which the minors were added as co-plaintiffs and a court‑appointed guardian was assigned. After the suit was compromised, the father, acting as natural guardian, sold the suit land to the first respondent without obtaining prior court sanction, …

S. JAFFAR SAHIBversusSECRETARY A.P.P.S.C. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1217Dismissed

S. Jaffar Sahib, a general‑category candidate, was denied appointment as Deputy Collector for the 1980‑81 recruitment, where five posts were reserved and five were open. He challenged the appointment of six candidates from reserved categories, alleging that the reservation rules were violated. The …

MRS. NALINI NAVIN BHAGWATI AND ORS.versusMR. CHANDRAVADAN M. MEHTA

1996 INSC 1200Appeal(s) allowed

Manvantrai Mehta died leaving property and a will of his wife Kamlaben. The sons, including Chandravadan Mehta, obtained probate of Kamlaben’s will in 1987. The other children, led by Nalini Navin Bhagwati, filed an application under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act to revoke that probate. …

INDER SINGH AND ANR.versusTHE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER, PUNJAB AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1178Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, tenants of agricultural land, applied under Section 22 of the Pepsu Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1955 in 1960 but were rejected for not having twelve years' continuous possession. A second application in 1965 was allowed, and the Financial Commissioner confirmed the order. The …

SMT. YALLAWWversusSMT. SHANTAVVA

1996 INSC 1163Disposed off

Basappa filed a divorce petition under Section 13(1)(i‑b) of the Hindu Marriage Act and obtained an ex‑parte decree on 15‑12‑1989. Basappa died on 26‑05‑1990; the wife, Shantavva, claimed she only learned of the decree on 31‑03‑1990 and was not properly served, filing an application under Order IX …

SRI HANUMANTHAPPAversusSRI MUNINARAYANAPPA

1996 INSC 1151Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Sri Hanumanthappa, filed a partition suit in 1966 and obtained a compromise decree in 1990 granting him a share of 39 guntas of land, for which he was put in possession by the Tehsildar in 1993. The respondent, Sri Muninarayanappa, had purchased the same land from a co‑sharer in 1986, …

JOGINDER TULIversusS.L. BHATIA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 1152Dismissed

The appellant, Joginder Tuli, occupied a premises under a lease dated 21 December 1990 at a rent of Rs.6,000 per month. The respondent, S.L. Bhatia, terminated the tenancy on 15 March 1993 and instituted suit No.133/1993 for possession, valuing the suit at Rs.72,000. The respondent later amended the …

DR. SHIVDEV SINGH GREWAL THROUGH DR. AMRIK SINGH SANDHUversusHARGURBACHAN SINGH GREWAL

1996 INSC 1153Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, residing in Malaysia, was served summons for a suit seeking declaration of title and possession of property. The suit was decreed ex‑parte on 22 July 1986. Upon learning of the decree on 13 November 1986, the appellant filed an application under Order IX, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil …

THE STATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.versusNILMANI SAHU AND ANR.

1996 INSC 1158Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar acquired 43.14 acres of land with trees under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and the Land Acquisition Officer valued the trees at Rs 2,466, a valuation upheld by the reference court and embodied in a decree dated 27 March 1980. The State paid compensation and the respondents …

JANAKI S. MENON AND ORS.versusDR. V.R.S. KRISHANAN AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1148Dismissed

The deceased V. Madhava Raja left unpaid income tax, wealth tax and agricultural income tax. A partition suit was filed, and the State sought to recover the tax dues by attaching the estate, eventually ordering the sale of the property Devi Vilas Palace by public auction. The auction purchaser …

BRIJ KISHORE SHARMA AND ANR.versusM/S RAM SINGH AND SONS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1135Dismissed

The respondents, a registered partnership firm, filed a suit to recover Rs. 58,880 on a promissory note dated 1 April 1960. During the pendency of the suit one of the partners died, and the trial court dismissed the suit on the ground that the deceased partner’s legal representatives had not been …

R. LAKSHMIversusK. SARASWATHI AMMAL

1996 INSC 1124Appeal(s) allowed

The husband obtained an ex‑parte decree of divorce and subsequently died. The wife (appellant) filed an application under Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure to set aside the decree, asserting that it affected her marital status and property rights. The trial court dismissed the …

RAM AVTAR AND ORS.versusRAM DHANI AND ORS

1996 INSC 1120Dismissed

The widow Smt. Phoola was allotted land in 1932 as part of a family compromise for her maintenance and her name was entered in revenue records. She later sold the land in 1956 to the respondents, but other members of the Hindu Undivided Family challenged the sale, claiming she only held a limited …

K. SANKARAN NAIR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusDEVAKI AMME MALATHY AMMA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1115Dismissed

The respondents filed a suit for partition and mesne profits, and the appellant claimed he was a tenant under a 1969 lease deed. The Tenancy Tribunal, the Kerala High Court and the Supreme Court (via special leave) held that he was not a tenant because Section 74 of the Kerala Land Reforms Act …

YESHODA AND ANR.versusK. NAGARAJAN

1996 INSC 1106Dismissed

In a suit for specific performance, the trial court passed a conditional decree requiring the respondent to deposit Rs.1,80,000 by 21 April 1994. The Karnataka High Court, on the respondent’s application, extended the time by three months. The petitioners then filed an application under Section 28 …

GUPTA STEEL INDUSTRIESversusM/S. JOLLY STEEL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 1098Disposed off

The parties entered into a compromise decree while an appeal was pending, obligating the respondents to deposit specified sums and the appellants to surrender possession of land and machinery. The respondents failed to deposit the amounts by the stipulated deadline; the High Court later accepted the …

C.K. LOKESHversusP.E. PANDURANGA NAIDU

1996 INSC 1092Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent filed a suit for declaration of title and injunction against the appellant, but personal service was not effected and substitute service by newspaper failed to reach the appellant. An ex‑parte decree was passed on March 30, 1985. Upon learning of the decree in 1990, the appellant …

RAMJI SHARMA @ RAMJI BABU (DEAD) BY LRS.versusTHE STATE OF BIHAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1083Dismissed

The appellants, co‑sharers of a parcel of land in the town of Hajipur, sought a re‑transfer of the land that had been sold to a third party under a registered deed. They invoked Section 16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961, which allows …

KUMUD LATA DASversusINDU PRASAD

1996 INSC 1076Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, a daughter-in-law, was in possession of a property when her mother‑in‑law filed a suit for possession. The appellant was set ex parte and sought restoration of the decree. The Delhi High Court ordered that the appellant deposit mesne profits of Rs 2,000 per month from the date of the …

GHANTESHER GHOSHversusMADAN MOHAN GHOSH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1071Disposed off

The case concerned a residential dwelling house owned by an undivided family. After a partition suit, the widow of a deceased co‑owner obtained a final decree for her one‑third share and later gifted that share to her brother, a stranger to the family, who filed an execution petition. During …

UNITED BANK OF INDIAversusSH. NARESH KUMAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1073Appeal(s) allowed

United Bank of India filed a suit to recover a loan advanced to the respondents. The trial court dismissed the suit on the ground that the plaint was not signed and verified by a competent person. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether a company may authorize an officer or ratify the signing …

JAIPUR DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITYversusMAHAVIR HOUSING CO-OP., SOCIETY, JAIPUR ETC.

1996 INSC 1069Appeal(s) allowed

The Jaipur Development Authority acquired land for an urban development scheme under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953. The Land Acquisition Officer initially awarded compensation of Rs 5,000 per bigha to Jai Ambe Co‑op Housing Society and Rs 7,500 per bigha to Mahavir Co‑op Housing Society. …

SANKALCHAN JAYCHANDBHAI PATEL AND ORS.versusVITHALBHAI JAYCHANDBHAI PATEL AND ORS.

1996 INSC 1054Dismissed

The appellants and respondent were co‑owners of a property that had been partitioned and subsequently mutated in revenue records. The respondent filed an appeal under Section 11 of the Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, which was dismissed, after which the appellants instituted a civil suit for …

SHROMANI GURDWARA PRABHANDAK COMMITTEEversusJASWANT SINGH

1996 INSC 999Dismissed

The respondent, Jaswant Singh, filed a suit seeking declaration of title and possession of a parcel of land. The petitioner, Shromani Gurudwara Prabandhak Committee, initially denied any title of the alleged owner, Isher Singh, in its first written statement. After trial, the petitioner sought to …

SMT. WINKY DILAWARI AND ANR.versusAMRITSAR IMPROVEMENT TRUST, AMRITSAR

1996 INSC 993Dismissed

The Amritsar Improvement Trust framed a scheme under the Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922 to create a passage to Guru Nanak Stadium and, after statutory publication and government approval, began acquiring land for the scheme. The appellants, who purchased a vacant site after the scheme’s approval …

SHARAFAT HUSSAIN (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusMOHD. SHAFIQ AND ORS.

1996 INSC 979Appeal(s) allowed

The sole appellant died while his appeal was pending before the High Court. The death was notified late, and the appellant's counsel could not locate the legal heirs to file a substitution application within the prescribed time, leading the High Court to declare the appeal abated and dismiss it. An …

SH. SUVARAN RAJARAM BANDEKAR AND ORS.versusSH. NARAYAN R. BANDEKAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 983Dismissed

The Supreme Court heard a civil appeal challenging a Bombay High Court order that dealt with a consent decree between the parties concerning payment of amounts and the handover of registration certificates (R.C.) for certain vehicles. The appellants sought modification of the payment schedule under …

N.R. DONGRE AND ORS.versusWHIRLPOOL CORPORATION AND ANR.

1996 INSC 971Dismissed

The plaintiffs, Whirlpool Corporation and its Indian joint‑venture TVS Whirlpool Ltd., claimed prior use and trans‑border reputation of the word mark "Whirlpool" and alleged that the defendants, trustees of Chinar Trust and related entities, had obtained a registration for the same mark in 1992 on …

ABDUR RAHMAN & ORSversusATHIFA BEGUM AND ORS .

1996 INSC 973Appeal(s) allowed

Abdur Rahman & Ors appealed to the Supreme Court against a Karnataka High Court order that dismissed their appeal under Order 41 Rule 17 of the CPC because their counsel was absent. While dismissing the appeal, the High Court also examined the merits of the case and concluded that there was no …

BAKHTAWAR SINGH AND ANR.versusSADA KAUR AND ANR.

1996 INSC 953Dismissed

The plaintiffs, sons of Gulab Singh, claimed a two‑thirds share in ancestral land and filed a suit in 1962 which was later allowed on appeal. They filed another suit in 1964 for possession, which they withdrew in 1971 with liberty to file a fresh suit. In 1990 they instituted a fresh suit, but the …

RAMESHWAR DASS GUPTAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 949Dismissed

The Uttar Pradesh Public Services Tribunal set aside the removal of Rameshwar Dass Gupta and ordered his confirmation, promotion and payment of salary, gratuity and pension. Gupta filed an execution petition under Order 21 Rule 1 of the CPC to recover the awarded amounts. The executing court, …

THE UNION OF INDIAversusSHRI SUBE RAM AND ORS.

1996 INSC 947Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India acquired land in Delhi under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and awarded compensation, which was subsequently enhanced by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Additional District Judge. The High Court, relying on the 1984 Amendment Act, further enhanced the compensation by granting …

BALRAM S/O BHASA RAMversusILAM SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 926Dismissed

The appellant, a decree‑holder, obtained a money decree against the respondent and sought execution by auctioning the respondent's agricultural land. Although the appellant was permitted to bid and his bid was accepted, he failed to deposit the full purchase price within the statutory 15‑day period, …

SMT. SAWARNIversusSMT. INDER KAUR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 932Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Smt. Sawarni, and her sister Roori claimed to be the daughters of the deceased landowner Gurbax Singh and sought a declaration of title and possession of the disputed land. A will executed by the widow Gurdip Kaur in favour of the two daughters and a succession certificate issued …

MRS. JUDITH FERNANDES AND ORS.versusCONCEICAO ANTONIO FERNANDESE AND ANR,

1996 INSC 924Dismissed

Mrs. Judith Fernandes and others leased land containing coconut trees to Conceicao Antonio Fernandes and others for six years. After the lease expired, the plaintiffs filed an eviction suit on 10 October 1973, before the Fifth Amendment to the Goa, Daman and Diu Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 came …

M/S. FAIR AIR ENGINEERS PVT. LTD. AND ANR.versusN.K. MODI

1996 INSC 910Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Fair Air Engineers Pvt. Ltd. entered into a contract with N.K. Modi to install a centrally air‑conditioned plant in his house. After alleged breach, the respondent filed a complaint before the State Consumer Commission, which stayed the proceedings and ordered the parties to arbitrate under …

HIRABAIversusHANUMANTH KRISHNAJI BHIDE AND ORS.

1996 INSC 902Dismissed

The petitioner, Hirabai, challenged the sale of her 8 acres of agricultural land that had been attached and sold under execution of a money decree. She argued that the proclamation of sale under Order 21 Rule 66 of the CPC was invalid because it did not contain a valuation of the property and …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BOMBAYversusT.P. KUMARAN

1996 INSC 894Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, an Income‑Tax Officer, was dismissed from service and filed a suit challenging his dismissal. The suit was decreed, resulting in his reinstatement, but the arrears of salary were not paid, prompting a writ petition in the High Court which ordered payment of all arrears. After the …

MAULVI ISSA QURESHIversusDISTRICT JUDGE, DEORIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 895Appeal(s) allowed

Ram Nihore filed a suit on April 25, 1988, impleading Mansari as co‑plaintiff for a perpetual injunction restraining the appellant from possession and enjoyment of the schedule property. The suit was dismissed for default on May 27, 1988. The appellant objected that Ram Nihore had died on September …

SATGURU SHARAN SHRIVASTAVAversusDWARKA PRASAD MATHUR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 888Dismissed

The petitioner had agreed to purchase a house from the first respondent, Dwarka Prasad Mathur, and paid the consideration. Before taking possession, the second respondent obtained a decree of specific performance in a separate suit, which the petitioner challenged in suit 121‑A of 1984 on the ground …

INDIAN BANKversusM/S. SATYAM FIBRES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

1996 INSC 861Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant Indian Bank forwarded Bills of Exchange to a French bank on behalf of the respondent M/s. Satyam Fibres, which later went into liquidation. The respondent claimed the bank was negligent for not securing co‑acceptance of the bills, relying on a covering letter (letter No. 2776) that …

M/S. AVIJIT TEA CO. PVT. LTD.versusM/S. TERAI TEA CO. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 854Case Partly allowed

The dispute arose from an agreement for the sale of green tea leaves in which Avijit Tea Co. advanced Rs. 20 lakh, later deposited with a court receiver. Avijit Tea filed a suit for specific performance, which was dismissed by a Division Bench of the Calcutta High Court, and the Bench ordered a …

BALDEV SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB THROUGH COLLECTOR

1996 INSC 841Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an appeal by Baldev Singh and others challenging the Punjab & Haryana High Court’s reduction of compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Collector had fixed Rs 16,000 per acre, the Additional District Judge raised it to Rs 30,000 per acre, …

JHANDOO (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA

1996 INSC 847Dismissed

The appellant’s land, measuring one bigha and 14 biswas, was acquired under a 1957 notification of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The reference court awarded compensation at Rs 10 per square yard, relying on the decision in A.N. Bhandari v. Union of India, which the High Court affirmed. The …

MOHAMMAD KHA,LILversusKAMARUDDIN

1996 INSC 821Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, one of four defendants in a suit for specific performance, challenged a decree of the appellate court before the Allahabad High Court. While three appellants were represented by counsel who appeared, the appellant had changed his advocate, and the new counsel failed to appear on the …

SARVINDER SINGHversusDALIP SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 817Appeal(s) allowed

Sarvinder Singh filed a suit for declaration of ownership of land based on a registered will of his mother dated 26 May 1952, also relying on an earlier decree granting him possession. He obtained an interim injunction against the defendants, which was later vacated. The defendants, heirs of …

DANDA RAJESHWARIversusBODAVULA HANUMAYAMMA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 802Dismissed

The petitioners challenged a High Court order directing them to file an election petition within three weeks of the writ petition's disposal and to have the Election Tribunal decide the matter without considering the statutory limitation of 30 days prescribed under Rule 3 of the Andhra Pradesh …

VIJAY PRATAP AND ORSversusSAMBHU SARAN SINHA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 803Dismissed

The petitioners, sons of a deceased plaintiff, applied to be added as parties to a specific performance suit after their father's name was deleted following his death. They alleged that the relinquishment deed signed by their father was forged and that being excluded would prejudice their rights. …

M.S.R. PRASADversusBOMMISETTI SUBBA RAO AND ORS.

1996 INSC 805Dismissed

The petitioner obtained an injunction from a civil court restraining the respondent from constructing a building that allegedly infringed his easement of air and light. The respondent filed a writ petition under Article 226 against the Municipal Corporation, claiming the construction was authorized, …

RAJ MANIversusTHE COLLECTOR, RAIPUR

1996 INSC 793

The appellant's land was acquired and a compensation award of Rs.1,000 per acre was made. He applied for a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but the court’s notice was not properly served; the notice was allegedly served on a deceased father. The reference court dismissed …

SAMSUDDIN RAHMAN AND ORS.versusBIHARI DAS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 711Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, owners of a parcel of land covered by a patta, claimed that land had gradually accreted to their estate as the Barak river receded over 15‑16 years. They sought a declaration of title over the accreted land, which was also claimed by the respondents under an annual patta granted by …

SMT. MITHLESH KUMARI AND ANR.versusTHAKUR SHEO SARAN SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 715Dismissed

The dispute concerned the succession to the Partapner Raj estate, an ancient impartible zamindari governed by the rule of lineal primogeniture. After the death of the minor adopted heir Raja Maha, competing claims arose: Kalka Singh of the senior branch asserted his right to the impartible estate …

PATTAM KHADER KHANversusPATTAM SARDAR KHAN AND ANR.

1996 INSC 718Appeal(s) allowed

In a partition suit, a house was auctioned and the sale was confirmed by the court on 7 August 1984. The auction purchaser obtained a sale certificate only on 9 November 1989 and filed an application for delivery of possession on the same day. The appellant contended that the application was barred …

UNION OF INDIAversusSWARAN SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 702Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India acquired land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with a compensation award made in 1978 and a decree confirming the award in 1981, which became final. After the 1984 amendment to the Act increased the solatium to 30% and interest rates, the respondents filed applications under …

SUSHILA NARAHARI AND ORS.versusNANDA KUMAR AND ANR.

1996 INSC 703Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed a suit for specific performance of a land sale, which was decreed ex‑parte against the appellants after their advocate withdrew his vakalatnama without notifying them. The appellants filed an application to set aside the ex‑parte decree, seeking condonation of a 40‑day delay …

STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.versusRAJ SINGH AND ANR. ETC.

1996 INSC 704Disposed off

The State of Rajasthan acquired land under the Rajasthan Land Acquisition Act, 1953 and the Land Acquisition Court awarded compensation by an award and decree dated 28 July 1992. The respondents applied for certified copies of the judgment and decree; the judgment copy was supplied and an appeal …

STATE OF ORISSA AND ORS.versusSLBARAM BARAL (SIMARAM BARAI)

1996 INSC 680Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Orissa filed a suit for Rs.1,46,820 against S. Baram Baral, which was decreed ex parte. The appellant sought relief under Order 9 Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, and the trial court set aside the ex parte decree subject to a payment of Rs.50. On revision, the Orissa High …

SUKHBIR SINGH AND ORS.versusBRIJ PAL SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 687Dismissed

The first petitioner purchased land from the respondent under a 1975 sale deed that included a reconveyance agreement. The respondent sued for specific performance, alleging the petitioner refused to execute the sale deed despite the respondent’s readiness and attendance at the Sub‑Registrar’s …

B.R. VEERABASAVARADHYAversusTHE DEVOTEES OF LINGADGUDI MUTT AND ORS.

1996 INSC 644Dismissed

In OS No. 22/62, the appellant (defendant 1) entered into a compromise under Order 23 Rule 3 of the CPC, and a decree was passed based on that compromise, granting him continued occupation as manager, possession of shops, and refunds. The suit was later remanded to consider defendants 2‑4, and after …

SMT. VIJAYALAKSHMIversusB. HIMANTHARAJA CHETTY AND ANR.

1996 INSC 631Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Smt. VUAYALAKSHMI, was the foster child of Batchu Muniyappa Chetty, who along with his brother B. Himantharaja Chetty partitioned their joint family property under a registered deed that included a pre-emption clause. After the foster father and his widow died, the property was …

THE III INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE - I, SALEM AND ANR.versusARUNAGIRI CHETTIAR

1996 INSC 636Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, Arunagiri Chettriar, retired from a partnership firm in 1963 and later the firm was dissolved. The Income Tax Officer issued a notice that the respondent was jointly and severally liable for tax arrears of the firm for assessment years 1962-63 and 1963-64, arguing that liability …

SH. JAG MOHAN CHAWLA AND ANR.versusDERA RADHA SWAMI SATSANG AND ORS.

1996 INSC 641Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for perpetual injunction to prevent the respondents from interfering with their possession of a specific plot of land. The respondents, in their written statement, claimed to have purchased a different plot and sought a counter‑claim for a permanent injunction to restrain …

BRITISH INDIAN CORPORATION LTD.versusMIS RASHTRACO FREIGHT CARRIERS

1996 INSC 628Appeal(s) allowed

British Indian Corporation Ltd entrusted 147 bales of raw wool to Rashtaco Freight Carriers for transport. The carrier detained the goods and sued the owner for an injunction, claiming arrears of Rs 13,48,817.13 in transport charges. The owner filed a separate suit for recovery of the detained …

CENTRAL BANK OF INDIAversusRAVINDRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 629

The Central Bank of India sought clarification on the meaning of the expression "the principal sum adjudged" in Section 34 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, particularly whether it includes interest that has merged with the principal. The Attorney General, appearing for the bank, relied on …

THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.versusSRI KARTICK CHANDRA DAS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 624Appeal(s) allowed

The State of West Bengal and others directed the appellant to grant registration and subsidy under the West Bengal Cinemas Development Scheme, a direction issued by a single High Court judge under Article 226. While the appeal against that direction was pending, contempt proceedings were initiated …

KIRAN BALAversusSURINDER KUMAR

1996 INSC 613Appeal(s) allowed

Kiran Bala sold her residential house to relatives to pay debts, but the sale was declared null and void as a fraudulent transfer under the Transfer of Property Act. The decree-holder sought to attach and sell the house in execution of a money decree, while the appellant claimed exemption under …

RADHEY SHYAM JAISWAL (DEAD) AND ORS.versusSMT. RAM DULARI DEVI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 604Dismissed

The decree-holder obtained a decree in 1949 and later sold the attached house to an auction purchaser. After a compromise failed, a fresh execution application was filed on 16 November 1961, more than twelve years after the decree, leading to the sale of the property. The widow and daughters of the …

FAUJA SINGHversusJASPAL KAUR

1996 INSC 561Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Fauja Singh, contested the attachment of his residential house in an execution proceeding, invoking Section 60(c) of the Code of Civil Procedure which renders a residential house non‑attachable. The executing court ignored the plea, and the Punjab & Haryana High Court dismissed the …

SMT. SARADA AND ORS.versusMANIKKOTH KOMBRA RAJENDRAN

1996 INSC 564Appeal(s) allowed

The suit concerned possession of 17 cents of land sold by T. Sekharan, who later died; the appellants (his heirs) claimed the sale was a collateral security for a loan and that an agreement dated 4 January 1983, executed in the presence of a police sub‑inspector, evidenced receipt of Rs 35,000 and …

MST. KARTAR KAURversusAJMER SINGH

1996 INSC 553Appeal(s) allowed

Kartar Kaur, the widow of the deceased Ranjit Singh, sued his son Ajmer Singh for declaration and possession of a suit property situated in the former PEPSU area. The son claimed sole inheritance under local custom, while the widow asserted a special custom allowing a widow to inherit alongside the …

STATE OF ORISSA ETC.versusKLOCKNER AND COMPANY AND ORS. ETC.

1996 INSC 531Dismissed

Klockner & Co., a German firm, had a marketing agreement with Orissa Mining Corporation (OMC) for exclusive marketing of charge chrome, containing an arbitration clause referring disputes to the ICC in London under Swiss law. After OMC's charge‑chrome division was taken over by the State of Orissa …

SRI SAMIR SOBHAN SANYALversusTRACKS TRADE PRIVATE LTD. AND ORS.

1996 INSC 534Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, S. S. Sanyal, was occupying premises as a tenant of India Foils Ltd. when the landlady sold the property to Habitat Developers, who obtained a decree for specific performance and possession. Although the decree was against the landlady, the appellant was not impleaded nor was any …

NABHIRAJ AND ORS.versusJAYAVATIBAI @SHANTHA BAI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 528Dismissed

The first respondent filed a suit on 30 October 1981 seeking a declaratory decree that she was the absolute owner of 6 acres 25 gunthas of land at Raichur. The appellants were later impleaded as respondents under Order 1 Rule 10 of the CPC but, despite repeated adjournments, failed to file a written …

MRS. JOYCE PRIMROSE PRESTORversusMISS VERA MARIE VAS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 513Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiff, Joyce Primrose Prestor, sought letters of administration for her mother’s estate, relying on a holograph will dated 19 June 1964 that bequeathed equal shares to her three daughters. The husband and two other daughters contested the will, alleging undue influence by the plaintiff. The …

URBAN IMPROVEMENT TRUST, JODHPURversusGOKUL NARAIN AND ANR.

1996 INSC 502Appeal(s) allowed

The Urban Improvement Trust (Jodhpur) acquired land of Gokul Narain under Section 52 of the Rajasthan Urban Improvement Act, 1959 and paid compensation. The High Court later enhanced the compensation and, applying the Central Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (as amended), awarded solatium, interest and …

DR. H. MUKHERJEEversusS.K. BHARGAWA

1996 INSC 498Dismissed

Dr. H. Mukherjee, a Central Government employee, filed a civil suit seeking Rs. 2 lakh in damages against his superior, S.K. Bhargava, alleging that the latter deliberately issued vindictive orders and tampered with official records to harass him and block his appointment as Chief Controller. The …

DR. SMT. SHIPRAversusSHANTI LAL KHOIWAL

1996 INSC 477Dismissed

Dr. SMT. Shipra filed an election petition challenging the election of S.L. Khotwal on grounds of corrupt practices. The petition and its supporting affidavit were served on the returned candidate, but the copy of the affidavit omitted the notarized verification required by Form 25 under Rule 94‑A …

T. VENKATA NARAYANA AND ORS,versusSMT. VENKATA SUBBAMMA (DEAD) AND ORS.

1996 INSC 461Appeal(s) allowed

In a suit for perpetual injunction, the appellants sought to restrain Smt. Venkata Subbamma (deceased) from alienating property granted to her under a 1969 compromise decree in a partition suit. After her death, the respondents, as legal representatives, claimed that Subbamma had executed a will in …

D. S. THIMMAPPAversusSIDDARAMAKKA

1996 INSC 462Dismissed

Thimmappa (appellant) had executed two sale deeds transferring a property to Siddaramakka (respondent) and a reconveyance agreement dated July 20, 1968, stipulating that if the respondent repaid Rs.5,000 within eight years, she could have the sale deed executed in her favour. The respondent offered …

STATE BANK OF PATIALA AND ORS.versusS.K. SHARMA

1996 INSC 459Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, S.K. Sharma, a bank manager, was charged with temporary misappropriation of a loan amount and was removed from service after a departmental enquiry. The enquiry officer relied on statements of witnesses, but the respondent was not supplied copies of those statements nor of certain …

TARLOK SINGHversusVIJAY KUMAR SABHARWAL

1996 INSC 444Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, owner of certain lands, was bound by a sale agreement dated December 21, 1984, which was later extended to require execution of the sale deed within 15 days of the vacating of an injunction. A suit for perpetual injunction was filed on December 23, 1987, and later amended on July 17, …

SEETHAMMALversusSENTHIL FINANCE AND ANR.

1996 INSC 396Appeal(s) allowed

In execution of a money decree, a mortgaged property valued at Rs 75,000 (later reduced to Rs 50,000) was auctioned and sold for Rs 15,100, with the mortgagee himself submitting the winning bid. The appellant, the judgment debtor, challenged the validity of the sale under Order 21 Rule 97 of the …

MOHANversusSMT. ANANDI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 367Dismissed

Mohan (appellant) claimed title to a property he had purchased from Bhiwa, who had earlier gifted the same land to the respondents. The respondents filed suit for declaration of title and possession. The trial court allowed attachment of the property, but the appellant challenged this in a separate …

SH. BAKSHISH SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS.versusARJAN SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 369Dismissed

A suit for dissolution of a partnership and rendition of accounts was filed by one partner against the other partners of the Modern Ice Factory. The trial court dismissed the suit, and the first appeal was also dismissed. While the second appeal was pending, two of the partners died and their legal …

SMT. AMBEY DEVIversusSTATE OF BIHAR AND ANR.

1996 INSC 371Dismissed

The State of Bihar acquired 25 acres of land under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and awarded compensation equally to four co‑owners, each receiving a one‑fourth share. One co‑owner filed a reference under Section 18 of the Act, leading the civil court to enhance his compensation. The appellant, …

DURGA PRASADversusNAVEEN CHANDRA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 356Dismissed

The respondent filed a suit for specific performance which culminated in a decree on 14 January 1994. Respondent No.2 and others filed applications under Order 9 Rule 13 CPC to set aside the decree, while the appellant moved a preliminary objection challenging the maintainability of those …

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusSHRI PRABHAKAR BHIKAJI INGLE

1996 INSC 357Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a police officer, was removed from service by the Commissioner of Police under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution and challenged the removal before the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal (MAT), which confirmed the removal on March 6, 1995. He filed a Special Leave Petition (SLP) …

DR. GHANSHYAM JAISWALversusKAMAL SINGH

1996 INSC 272Appeal(s) allowed

In a suit for ejectment filed on 5 April 1984, the respondent entered into a compromise and a decree for eviction was subsequently recorded. The respondent failed to deliver possession, prompting the appellant to file an execution petition. The respondent first challenged the validity of the …

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR.versusRANCHI MUNICIPAL CORPN. RANCHI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 273Appeal(s) allowed

The Ranchi Municipal Corporation demanded Rs 1,01,501 as service charges from the Railways for the years 1993‑94 and 1994‑95. The Union of India challenged the demand, and the Patna High Court upheld it. On appeal, the Supreme Court examined whether the municipality could levy such charges under …

BABULALversusRAJ KUMAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 274Appeal(s) allowed

Babulal obtained a decree for specific performance of a contract for sale of immovable property, but the decree did not grant possession. When the decree‑holder sought to execute the decree, Raj Kumar (the appellant), who was not a party to the decree, claimed a right in the property and obtained an …

SINGHAI LAL CHAND JAIN (DEAD)versusRASHTRIYA SWAYAM SEWAK SANGH, PANNA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 266Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant sought eviction of the Rashtriya Swayam Sewak Sangh (RSS Sangh) from premises it occupied. The Sangh was represented in the suit by its manager, president and a member, and the trial court dismissed the suit. The Madhya Pradesh High Court, on appeal, decreed ejectment in favour of the …

MUKHTIAR AHMEDversusSMT. HUSAN BANO AND ORS.

1996 INSC 246Dismissed

Mukhtar Ahmed filed a suit seeking a declaration that he was entitled to a two‑thirds share in a house as a co‑owner. Earlier, in a suit filed by a co‑sharer, the court had determined that the co‑sharer was only entitled to a one‑fifth share, and that decree became final. The issue before the …

THE STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA AND ORS.versusNEW MARINE COAL CO. (PVT.) LTD.

1996 INSC 251Appeal(s) allowed

The Steel Authority of India sued New Marine Coal Co. to recover Rs 1,13,000 for coal supplied under an agreement that required Grade‑I coal between Dec 1962 and June 1967. Instead, Grade‑II coal was delivered but the plaintiff collected the price of Grade‑I, and the contract contained a clause …

S. NOORDEENversusV.S. THIRU VENKITA REDDIAR AND ORS.

1996 INSC 203Dismissed

The appellant S. Noordeen challenged the validity of a sale of properties that had been attached before judgment in a suit (O.S. No. 95/53) to recover a debt from D.J. Gonzaga. The properties, including items 1‑7 attached under Order 38 Rule 6 of the CPC, were incorporated in a compromise decree …

INDERMANI KIRTIPALversusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 189Dismissed

The petitioner, a former semi‑skilled workman who later became an Assistant Store Keeper, claimed that he was unfairly excluded from promotion to the OEP Section, alleging a violation of his right to consideration. The Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dismissed his application through a …

S. BALDEV SINGH MANNversusS. GURCHARAN SINGH, MLA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 179Dismissed

The appellant, S. Baldev Singh Mann, filed an election petition challenging the 1992 Punjab Legislative Assembly election of S. Gurcharan Singh (respondent No.1) on grounds of booth capturing and overspending. He alleged that the respondent and his agents threatened the appellant's polling agent and …

SABITRI DEI AND ORS.versusSARAT CHANDRA ROUT AND ORS.

1996 INSC 167Appeal(s) allowed

The decree-holder, a deceased intermediary, obtained a decree for possession of an estate in 1965, but the estate had been vested in the State of Orissa by a notification under Section 3(1) of the Orissa Estate Abolition Act in 1963. The judgment debtor filed a Section 47 CPC objection, and the …

SURENDRA KUMARversusPHOOLCHAND (DEAD) THROUGH LRS. AND ANR.

1996 INSC 168Dismissed

The appellant Surendra Kumar purchased 25.12 acres of land in 1961 in his name, with his grandfather acting as guardian, and the land was later acquired by the government for an industrial area. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 granted compensation to the appellant, but …

SMT. PUTTAHONNAMMAversusC. GANGADHARA MURTHY AND ORS.

1996 INSC 172Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a family partition and subsequent land demarcation ordered by the Assistant Director of Land Records, which was challenged by the respondents. The respondents appealed the demarcation order under Section 49 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1956, and the appeal was allowed, …

SURINDER KUMAR AND ANR.versusISHWAR DAYAL AND ANR.

1996 INSC 175Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants appealed against the execution of a perpetual injunction decree that barred their mother from opening a window in a joint wall. The trial court had held the wall to be a 1½‑ft joint wall and the decree became final. Subsequent admissions showed that the original joint wall had been …

SURAIN SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.versusMEHENGA (DEAD) BY LRS.

1996 INSC 164Dismissed

The appellants challenged a sale deed dated 29 September 1959, alleging that it was obtained by fraud, misrepresentation and without consideration. The trial court dismissed the suit, finding the deed valid; the first appellate court reversed that finding, holding that adequate consideration had …

RAM CHANDRA VERMAversusSHRI JAGAT SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 148Appeal(s) allowed

The respondents filed eviction suits against tenant Harkesh Rai Agarwal in 1975, both of which were dismissed, after which a compromise decree was entered on 26 Nov 1981 whereby Harkesh Rai agreed to surrender a room now occupied by the appellant, Ram Chandra Verma. When execution of the decree was …

STATE OF HARYANAversusCHANDRA MANI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 150Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Haryana filed a Letters Patent Appeal against a judgment of the Punjab & Haryana High Court, but delayed filing the appeal by 109 days. The High Court refused to condone the delay under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963. The Supreme Court examined the meaning of "sufficient cause" …

STATE OF MADHYA PRADESHversusS.S. AKOLKAR

1996 INSC 134Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the dismissal of its appeal in a civil suit where the respondent, S.S. Akolkar, had died. The State filed an application under Order 22 Rule 4 of the CPC to substitute the legal representatives of the deceased, but the application was filed 15 days after …

S. SWVIGARADOSSversusZONAL MANAGER, F.C.I.

1996 INSC 136Dismissed

The petitioner, born in 1941 to parents who had converted to Christianity before his birth, later reconverted to Hinduism at age 14 and claimed to be an Adi‑Dravida Scheduled Caste to obtain SC benefits in his employment with the Food Corporation of India. He filed a suit for a declaration of …

RADHIKA DEVIversusBAJRANGI SINGH AND ORS.

1996 INSC 98Dismissed

The appellant filed a partition suit in 1988, after which the respondents claimed ownership of the property by virtue of a gift deed executed and registered in 1978. In 1992 the appellant sought to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the CPC to obtain a declaration that the gift deed was …

PADANATHIL RUGMINI AMMAversusP.K. ABDULLA

1996 INSC 87Appeal(s) allowed

The dispute arose from a leasehold property originally owned by a Tarwad, which was taken by an ex parte decree in 1942 and sold at a court auction to the decree‑holder Mohammed Haji. The decree‑holder subsequently leased the land to Raghavan Nair, whose rights were later assigned to P.K. Abdulla, …

CHOLAMANDALAM INVESTMENTS AND FINANCE CO. PVT. LTD.versusRADHIKA SYNTHETICS AND ANR.

1996 INSC 73Disposed off

Cholamandalam Investments & Finance Co. Pvt. Ltd. filed a suit in the Madras High Court for recovery of money under a hire‑purchase agreement that contained a clause granting exclusive jurisdiction to Madras courts. Radhika Synthetics Ltd. later instituted a suit in the Bombay High Court claiming …

RAMESH SINGH (DIED) BY L.RS. AND ORS.versusSTATE OF HARYANA AND ORS.

1996 INSC 68Dismissed

The State acquired land in Etmadpur Village under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the Collector awarded compensation under Section 11. Ramesh Singh and Hari Singh sought a reference under Section 18, which was dismissed, while Ruma Singh obtained a higher award after a reference and a decree …

BANK OF BARODAversusR.M. PATWA AND ANR.

1996 INSC 63Appeal(s) allowed

The Bank of Baroda obtained a money decree against R.M. Patwa for Rs 55,000 with interest and filed an execution application. Patwa sought, under Section 151 CPC, to have amounts crediting a third‑party, G.K. Kakkani, adjusted against his decree debt. The Additional District Judge ordered such …

SMT. RAJNIBAI @ MANNUBAIversusSMT. KAMLA DEVI AND ORS.

1996 INSC 65Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed a suit for declaration of title to a property and simultaneously applied under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of the CPC for a temporary injunction to protect his possession. The trial court granted the injunction, but the High Court reversed the order, holding that where there is no …

SH.MULKRAJversusSH. SUNDER DAS AND ORS.

1996 INSC 52Disposed off

The appellant, who had obtained possession of certain plots in New Delhi, filed a suit for a mandatory injunction against the third respondent, which became final. Subsequently, the appellant and the first two respondents each purchased a one‑third share of the property, leading to a partition suit …

THE CHURCH OF SOUTH INDIA TRUST ASSOCIATIONversusTHE TELUGU CHURCH COUNCIL

1996 INSC 46Dismissed

The Church of South India Trust Association (CSITA) claimed that the Telugu Church Council (TCC) had merged into the Church of South India in 1947 and therefore the properties transferred to CSITA were held in trust. TCC contested the merger and sought declaration of its continued existence. Earlier …

SYAM SUNDER AGARWAL AND CO.versusUNION OF INDIA

1996 INSC 36Dismissed

Syam Sunder Agarwal & Co. entered into a contract with the Union of India, which later gave rise to an arbitration award of Rs. 6,72,645.56 in favour of the appellant. The award was made a rule of court by the Assistant to the Deputy Commissioner, Shillong, and the Union of India appealed the award …

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.versusM/S. NATIONAL CONSTRUCTION CO., BOMBAY AND ANR.

1996 INSC 39Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Maharashtra entered into a construction contract with National Construction Co. and obtained a performance guarantee from the Central Bank of India. When the contractor abandoned the work, the State sued the bank alone for the guaranteed amount; the suit was dismissed for non‑joinder of …

THE AJMER CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK LTD. AJMER, THROUGH THE MANAGING DIRECTORversusTHE PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY UNDER THE RAJASTHAN SHOPS AND CO. ESTABLISHMENT ACT, AIMER AND ORS.

1996 INSC 21Dismissed

The manager of a village cooperative Samiti (the second respondent) was dismissed on charges of embezzlement. Claiming that the dismissal order was never served, he filed a civil suit for injunction, which was later withdrawn, and also lodged a complaint under Section 28‑A of the Rajasthan Shops and …

VISWANATH (DEAD) BY LR.versusCHANDRA BHAN AND ORS.

1995 INSC 888Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Viswanath (deceased) by LRs, sought ejectment of the respondent who occupied land under a mortgage executed by Hanuman Singh, the brother‑in‑law of a minor, before the U.P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950 came into force. The Assistant Collector and Board of Revenue …

DHARAMDEOversusBIJARAT AND ORS.

1995 INSC 883Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of the U.P. High Court (Abolition of Letters patent Appeals) (Amendment) Act, 1972, which sought to eliminate letter‑patent appeals in land‑reform matters. Petitioners contended that the Act exceeded State legislative competence, violated …

PROF. RAMCHANDRA G. KAPSE ETC.versusHARIBANSH RAMAKBAL SINGH ETC

1995 INSC 870Appeal(s) allowed

The Supreme Court examined an election petition that had declared the Lok Sabha election of Prof. Ramchandra G. Kapse void on the ground of alleged corrupt practices involving speeches by Sadhvi Reethambara and Pramod Mahajan. The Court held that a noticee under Section 99 of the Representation of …

THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES FOR THE PORT OF CALCUTTAversusENGINEERS-DE-SPACE-AGE

1995 INSC 861Dismissed

The Board of Trustees for the Port of Calcutta contracted with Engineers‑de‑Space‑Age, including a clause (13(g)) that barred the Commissioners from entertaining any claim for interest on delayed payments. An arbitrator, however, awarded interest pendente lite. The Board appealed, contending that …

DR. MAHESH CHAND SHARMAversusSMT. RAJ KUMARI SHARMA AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 823Case Partly allowed

Ram Nath Dewan executed a 1942 will granting his wife Satyawati a life estate in the Doctor's Lane house and directing that after her death the property go to his legal heirs. After Ram Nath's death, the son (first defendant) contested the will, claiming a later 1950 will, and the parties litigated …

M/S KABARI PVT. LTD.versusSHIVNATH SHROFF AND ORS.

1995 INSC 824Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement and were ordered by the High Court to amend the plaint to implead the purchaser, Kabari Pvt. Ltd. Although the amendment was allowed in 1982, the plaintiffs failed to act on it for about ten years despite being aware of their …

STATE OF GUJARAT THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY AND ORS.versusSARTI DEVI

1995 INSC 790Disposed off

Lal Singh, a constable of the Gujarat State Reserve Police, died in service. His widow received a family pension which was stopped after she remarried. The deceased's mother, Sarti Devi, filed a suit in a Haryana court seeking the family pension. The trial court and subsequent appellate courts …

G. NAGAMMA AND ANR.versusSIROMENAMMA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 793Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement for reconveyance and later applied under Order 16 Rule 17 of the CPC to amend the plaint to claim that the sale deed and reconveyance were a single transaction (mortgage by conditional sale) and to seek alternative relief of …

KULDEEP SINGHversusGANPAT LAL AND ANR.

1995 INSC 784Dismissed

The tenant, Kuldeep Singh, was sued for eviction by his landlords for allegedly defaulting on six months' rent. He claimed to have paid the rent in cash for May‑September 1982, but the landlords refused to give a receipt and returned the money, after which he deposited the rent for May‑October 1982 …

GURBACHAN SINGHversusBRAG SINGH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 788Dismissed

The petitioners filed a suit for perpetual injunction to restrain the defendants from dispossessing them of land. The defendants filed a written statement raising a counter‑claim for possession, alleging trespass. The trial court dismissed the injunction suit and granted possession to the …

BHAGWAN DAS AND ANR.versusSARDAR ATMA SINGH

1995 INSC 777Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, who were tillers of agricultural land allotted under the Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954, held the land by a temporary sanad in 1954 that became permanent in 1965. After purchasing the land, the respondent, an absentee landlord, sought possession under …

RESHAM SINGH PYARA SINGHversusABDUL SATTAR

1995 INSC 757Dismissed

The petitioner, Resham Singh Pyara Singh, claimed ownership of land purchased from a charity trust and obtained an interim injunction against the respondent's alleged trespass. The single judge of the Bombay High Court, hearing an appeal under Order 43, directed demarcation of the land in the …

L. MOOLCHAND AND ORS.versusFATIMA SULTANA BEGUM AND ORS.

1995 INSC 733Dismissed

In an administrative suit concerning the sale of a property at Ootacamund, the Court appointed receivers who effected the sale. The purchasers of the property (appellants) challenged objections raised under Order 21, Rule 90 read with Section 151 of the CPC, arguing that such objections were not …

VIDESH SANCHAR NIGAM LTD.versusM. V. KAPITAN KUD AND ORS.

1995 INSC 716Appeal(s) allowed

Videsh Sanchar Nigam Ltd. sued the foreign vessel M.V. Kapitan Kud for damage to an international submarine cable, alleging the ship’s anchor caused a break. The Bombay High Court arrested the vessel and later ordered its release on security, a decision appealed to the Supreme Court. The Court …

DEV KUMAR (DEAD) THROUGH LRS.versusSMT. SWARAN LATA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 717Appeal(s) allowed

The landlady, Smt. Swaran Lata, sought eviction of her tenant Dev Kumar under the East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 alleging sub‑letting of the premises to three respondents. The Rent Controller, relying on a local commissioner’s report, concluded sub‑letting and ordered eviction. The …

MUNI LALversusTHE ORIENTAL FIRE AND GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. AND ANR.

1995 INSC 709Dismissed

Muni Lal insured his truck with Oriental Fire and General Insurance Company and lost it in October 1983 due to the driver’s misfeasance. He filed a suit in 1986 seeking only a declaration that he was entitled to the insured amount, omitting any claim for monetary compensation. The trial court …

LAXMI CHAND & ORS.versusGRAM PANCHAYAT, KARARIA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 688Dismissed

The petitioners challenged the acquisition of their land by a Gram Panchayat for a school, arguing that the Land Acquisition Officer (LAO) had lost jurisdiction after initially dropping the proceedings due to the Panchayat’s lack of funds. The Supreme Court held that the LAO retained power to reopen …

BAPU MAHADU. MALI & ORS.versusVITHALRAO BHAUSAHEB DESHMUKH AND ANR.

1995 INSC 682Dismissed

In a suit for possession filed by the rival reversioners, the appellants, who were the landlords, were defendants. The respondents had remained in possession for over twelve years, thereby acquiring title by adverse possession, and the appellants had also entered into a tenancy agreement with them, …

GAUHATI UNIVERSITYversusSHRI NIHARLAL BHATTACHARJEE

1995 INSC 684Appeal(s) allowed

The Gauhati University was served a summons on 28 May 1990 to appear on 29 May 1990 in a suit. The University sought an adjournment, the case was adjourned to 19 July 1990, but the new date was never communicated, leading to an ex parte decree. The University filed an application under Order IX Rule …

CENTRAL BANK OF !NOIAversusM/S. MADAN LAL AND BROTHERS AND ORS.

1995 INSC 667Disposed off

The Central Bank of India obtained a decree against M/s. Madan Lal and Brothers for a debt and directed execution against a hypothecated factory premises. The respondents contended that the property should be sold at its market value, with the proceeds applied to the decree, and that any shortfall …

DEVA RAM AND ANR.versusISHWAR CHAND AND ANR.

1995 INSC 627

The plaintiff Deva Ram sued Ishwar Chand for Rs 6,300 as sale price of a land, but the trial court held the document was only an agreement for sale and that the defendants were tenants, dismissing the suit. The plaintiff then filed a second suit for possession of the same land; the trial court …

KASHIBAI W/O LACHIRAM AND ANR.versusPARWATIBAI W/O LACHIRAM AND ANR.

1995 INSC 597Appeal(s) allowed

The plaintiffs, the first wife Kashi Bai and her daughter Sunita, sued for a half share in the property of their deceased husband Lachiram, alleging he was the sole owner at his death. The defendants, the second wife Parwati Bai, her daughter Meena and grandson Purshottam, contended that Lachiram …

DR. RANBIR SINGHversusASHARFI LAL

1995 INSC 592Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant, Dr. Ranbir Singh, purchased a property from Shri Hemant Singh, the adopted son of the late Maharaja of Dholpur, and served notice to the tenant, Asharfi Lal, for rent default. The trial court and first appellate court upheld the eviction, finding a landlord‑tenant relationship and …

LARSEN AND TOUBRO LTD.versusMAHARASHTRA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD AND ORS.

1995 INSC 572Appeal(s) allowed

Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (appellant) entered into a contract with Maharashtra State Electricity Board (respondent) for a coal handling plant, furnishing five bank guarantees for advance, performance, retention money and liquidated damages. After the plant was taken over, the respondent invoked all …

SH. JANGLI AND ORS.versusSMT. BHAGWATI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 563Dismissed

The appellant, a tenant of Smt. Ajudhia, sought a declaration of title over a parcel of agricultural land that had been sold in execution of a money decree against her and later transferred to an auction‑purchaser, respondent No. 11. The appellant had earlier obtained a decree under the Punjab …

BHOOP SINGHversusRAM SINGH MAJOR AND ORS.

1995 INSC 553Dismissed

The petitioners, heirs of a common ancestor, claimed a one‑third share in land, relying on a 1973 declaratory decree that had been obtained on the basis of the defendant’s written admission of their title. The decree was never registered. The trial court held the decree illegal; the appellate courts …

SURJIT SINGH AND ORS ETC. ETC.versusHARBANS SINGH AND ORS ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 539Appeal(s) allowed

The case involved a family settlement deed that prohibited alienation of the ancestral property during the lifetime of the patriarch, Janak Singh. After his death, a suit for partition was filed and the trial court passed a preliminary decree and subsequently an order restraining all parties from …

UNION OF INDIAversusRANGJLA RAM (DEAD) BY LRS.

1995 INSC 504Appeal(s) allowed

The Union of India acquired land for defence purposes under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and a compensation award was made and became final. After the 1984 Amendment Act (Act 68) introduced additional solatium and interest benefits, the landowners filed an application under Sections 151 and 152 of …

VIJAYKUMAR DURGAPRASAD GAJBI AND ORSversusKAMLABAI AND ORS.

1995 INSC 490Dismissed

The appellants, who were defendants in civil suits filed in 1983, failed to appear before the trial court on 20 February 1992, leading to ex‑parte orders against them. They applied under Order 9 Rule 13 of the CPC to have those orders set aside, claiming they were diligent and that their …

MOOL CHAND AND ORSversusDY. DIRECTOR, CONSOLIDATION AND ORS

1995 INSC 466

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from partition suits that were pending when a village was notified for consolidation under the Uttar Pradesh Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1967. The appellants argued that the notification and the resulting abatement under Section 5(2) of the …

SHARADCHANDRA GANESH MULEYversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

1995 INSC 458Dismissed

Sharadchandra Ganesh Muley, a landowner, challenged a notification under section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. After the Bombay High Court dismissed his first writ petition in 1992, the Land Acquisition Officer made an award on March 30, 1994. Muley appealed, contending that the award was …

JAYASHREEversusM. SRINIVASA MURTHY

1995 INSC 459Disposed off

In a transfer petition filed by the wife seeking to transfer her pending divorce petition, the court directed the parties to attempt reconciliation. The husband and wife settled their differences and the wife agreed to join her husband within two years after resolving her property issues in another …

M/S. GUJARAT BOTTLING COMPANY LTD. AND ORS.versusTHE COCA COLA CO. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 441Dismissed

Gujarat Bottling Co. Ltd (GBC) entered into a 1993 licence agreement with Coca Cola to bottle and distribute beverages under several trade marks, which included a negative covenant prohibiting GBC from dealing in competing products during the agreement's term. A subsequent 1994 agreement, intended …

DEPUTY COLLECTOR NORTHERN SUBDIVISION, PANAJIversusCOMMUNIDADE OF BAMBOLIM

1995 INSC 421Appeal(s) allowed

The State sought enhanced compensation for land acquired at Bambolim, Goa, and filed an appeal against the Civil Court's award on August 25, 1967. The Government Pleader was uncertain whether to pursue the appeal under the Portuguese Code (Recurso de Apelacao) or the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), …

GAJANAN KRISHNAJI BAPAT AND ANOTHERversusDATTAJI RAGHOBAJI MEGHE AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 404Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined an election petition challenging the Lok Sabha election of Datta Raghobaji Meghe on allegations that he exceeded the permissible election‑expenditure limit and committed corrupt practices. The Court reiterated that the right to elect and be elected is a statutory right …

MUKRI GOPALANversusCHEPPILAT PUTHANPURAYIL ABOOBACKER

1995 INSC 390Appeal(s) allowed

The tenant Mukrigopalan appealed an eviction order of the Rent Control Court under the Kerala Buildings (Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965. The appeal was filed after the statutory 30‑day period, and the District Judge acting as appellate authority dismissed it as time‑barred, holding that he was a …

N.P. THIRUGNANAM (D) BY L.RS.versusDR. R. JAGAN MOHAN RAO AND ORS.

1995 INSC 394Dismissed

The plaintiff N.P. Thirugnanam had entered into a sale agreement for a property and paid a small advance, thereafter taking possession as a tenant. He sued for specific performance, alleging the defendants had refused to execute the sale deed, while the defendants contended that the plaintiff had …

RASHTRIYA CHINI MILLS ADHIKARI PARISHAD, LUCKNOWversusTHE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 385Appeal(s) allowed

The petitioners, Rashtriya Chini Mills Adhikari Parishad, challenged a Uttar Pradesh Government order to sell six sugar factories by filing a writ petition under Article 226 before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court. The Division Bench held that the Lucknow Bench lacked jurisdiction …

NAND KISHORE MEHRAversusSUSHILA MEHRA

1995 INSC 383Appeal(s) allowed

The husband, Nand Kishore Mehra, filed a suit in the Delhi High Court seeking relief concerning properties he alleged were purchased benami in his wife Sushila Mehra's name. The wife moved to have the plaint rejected on the ground that the suit was barred by Section 4 of the Benami Transactions …

MOST REV. P.M.A. METROPOLITAN AND ORS.versusMORAN MAR MARTHOMA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 380Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined a long‑standing dispute between the Patriarch of Antioch’s group (the petitioner) and the Catholicos of the East’s group (the respondent) over the nature, governance and authority of the Malankara Jacobite Syrian Church. The Court held that the 1934 Constitution of the …

G.C. KANUNGOversusSTATE OF ORISSA

1995 INSC 378Case Allowed

The petitioners, contractors who had contracts with the State of Orissa, obtained arbitral awards from Special Arbitration Tribunals which were later made "Rules of Court" by civil courts. The State subsequently enacted the Arbitration (Orissa Second Amendment) Act, 1991, which retrospectively …

B. GANGADHARversusB.G. RAJALINGAM

1995 INSC 379Dismissed

The petitioner, a judgment‑debtor, constructed shops on a suit property and let tenants occupy them while a suit for title and possession was pending. The trial court declared the respondent the owner and ordered the petitioner to hand over vacant possession; the decree became final. When the …

TEJ KAUR AND ANR.versusKIRPAL SINGH AND ANR.

1995 INSC 368Dismissed

The appellant challenged a decree confirming a lower court's finding that a 1967 will was not validly executed. The Punjab & Haryana High Court Division Bench was split, with one judge holding the will proved and the other holding it not proved; no majority opinion existed. The Supreme Court …

RAJASTHAN STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION AND ANR. ETC.versusKRISHNA KANT ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 335Appeal(s) allowed

The employees of Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation were dismissed after disciplinary inquiries conducted under certified Standing Orders. They filed civil suits seeking declaration that the dismissals were illegal and that they be reinstated with benefits. The corporation contended that the …

PT. RISHIKESH AND ANR. ETC.versusSMT. SALMA BEGUM ETC. ETC.

1995 INSC 325

The petitioners, tenants, challenged the validity of Order 15 Rule 5 of the Code of Civil Procedure, which had been inserted by the Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Amendment) Act, 1972 and later amended by the Uttar Pradesh Civil Laws (Reforms and Amendment) Act, 1976, on the ground that it was repugnant …

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, JULLUNDURversusAJANTA ELECTRICALS, PUNJAB

1995 INSC 329Dismissed

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Jullundur issued notices under Section 139(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 to Ajanta Electricals and its partners, requiring them to file returns within 30 days. The assessees filed their returns and applications for extension of time after the due dates, leading the …

VIDYAWATIversusMAN MOHAN AND OTHERS

1995 INSC 321Dismissed

The plaintiffs filed a suit for possession of a property against the first defendant, who was deceased, and the second defendant, the petitioner. The petitioner sought to file an additional written statement asserting title under a will, but the trial court dismissed the application, holding that a …

K. RAHEJA CONSTRUCTIONS LTD. AND ANR.versusALLIANCE MINISTRIES AND ORS.

1995 INSC 322Dismissed

The petitioners filed a suit for a permanent injunction to restrain the respondents from dealing with a trust property. After the suit was filed, they discovered that the Charity Commissioner had granted permission to sell the property and sought to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 to claim …

STATE OF BIHARversusDHIRENDRA KUMAR AND ORS.

1995 INSC 309Appeal(s) allowed

The State of Bihar issued a notification under s.4 and a declaration under s.6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to acquire land for a housing project, and took possession on March 22, 1957, handing it to the Housing Board. The respondent filed a title suit and sought an interim injunction under …

LALITHA J. RAJversusAITHAPPA RAJ

1995 INSC 310Appeal(s) allowed

Lalitha filed a suit for declaration of title and possession and later filed an application on August 3, 1993, seeking to file a list of witnesses for summoning. Her husband, acting as general power of attorney, submitted an affidavit stating they mistakenly believed the list had already been filed, …

RAM BHAJAN SINGH AND ORS.versusMADHESHWAR SINGH (DEAD) BY LRS. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 306Appeal(s) allowed

The appellants, legal representatives of defendants 7‑9, filed a suit seeking a declaration that a compromise decree in an earlier suit (T.S. No. 72/26) was void. The trial court dismissed the suit; the appellate court held the compromise was not obtained by fraud but that the defendants had no …

MATHUNNI MATHAIversusM/S. HINDUSTAN ORGANIC CHEMICALS LTD. AND ANR.

1995 INSC 297Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned a land‑acquisition award where the High Court enhanced the market value, solatium and interest under the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1984. The Supreme Court stayed the collection of the enhanced portion, after which the respondent deposited the amount that was not stayed on …

M/S. ANGILE INSULATIONSversusM/S. DAVY ASHMORE INDIA LTD. AND ANR.

1995 INSC 273Dismissed

M/s Angile Insulations filed a suit in the Sub‑Judge Court, Dhanbad, to recover sums due under a contract with Davy Ashmore India Ltd. The respondent invoked clause 21 of the contract, which stipulated that any legal proceedings would be subject to the jurisdiction of the High Court of Bangalore. …

BUTA SINGH (DEAD) BY L.RS.versusUNION OF INDIA

1995 INSC 267Dismissed

The case involved land‑acquisition proceedings where compensation was successively enhanced by the Additional District Judge, a High Court Single Judge and a Division Bench. The claimants filed appeals under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act but paid court fee only on the lower amount …

NAGAR PALIKA, JINDversusJAGAT.SINGH, ADVOCATE

1995 INSC 223Appeal(s) allowed

The Municipal Committee of Jind appealed against a suit filed by Jagat Singh for a permanent injunction restraining the Committee from interfering with his claimed ownership and possession of five kanals of land. Jagat Singh relied solely on revenue records and a mutation entry, without producing a …

AKSHAYA RESTAURANTversusP. ANJANAPPA AND ANR.

1995 INSC 219Dismissed

Akshaya Restaurant filed a suit for perpetual injunction against P. Anjanappa and others, alleging an agreement of sale of land. The defendants' written statement admitted a sale agreement, but later they sought to amend the statement under Order 6 Rule 17, claiming the agreement was for development …

KART AR SINGH @ NARANJAN SINGH AND ORS.versusSTATE OF PUNJAB

1995 INSC 190Dismissed

The appellants received compensation for land acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, which was later enhanced and subsequently reduced on appeal. While the appeal was pending, they executed the decree and recovered the enhanced amount together with interest. The State filed an application under …

SHANKAR BALWANT LOKHANDEversusCHANDRAKANT SHANKER LOKHANDE

1995 INSC 187Appeal(s) allowed

The parties obtained a preliminary decree in a partition suit allocating a 1/6th share to the first respondent and a 5/6th share to the appellants. Although the court directed the preparation of a final decree in 1958, the final decree could not be engrossed because the appellants failed to supply …

BASHIR AHMEDversusMEHMOOD HUSSAIN SHAH.

1995 INSC 188Appeal(s) allowed

The appellant filed an ejectment suit in 1988 which was repeatedly adjourned. On 8 August 1994, due to a lawyers' strike, the case was adjourned to 9 August 1994. The appellant's counsel fell ill and requested a short adjournment, offering to pay costs, but the trial court refused and ordered …

PPK GOPALAN NAMBIARversusPPK BALAKRISHNAN NAMBIAR AND ORS.

1995 INSC 172Appeal(s) allowed

In a partition suit, the defendant (appellant) produced a registered will executed by his mother that left the entire estate to him. The trial court rejected the will, finding suspicious circumstances, while the subordinate judge upheld its validity, relying on the registrar's endorsement as proof …

CANARA BANKversusNUCLEAR POWER CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. AND ORS.

1995 INSC 160Appeal(s) allowed

Canara Bank appealed a decision of the Company Law Board (CLB) that had refused to register bonds purchased from Nuclear Power Corporation of India Ltd. The CLB had been hearing the bank's application under Section 111 of the Companies Act when the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to …

NANI GOPAL PAULversusT. PRASAD SINGH AND ORS.

1995 INSC 164Appeal(s) allowed

The case arose from a foreclosure suit where a court‑appointed receiver sold the mortgaged property to the appellant, Nani Gopal Paul, for Rs 60 lakhs, of which only Rs 5 lakhs was deposited. The sale was confirmed by a single High Court judge despite the existence of higher offers and without …