Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
11 judgments · newest first · showing 1–11
Petitioners Sandeep and four others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging the FIR dated 09‑07‑2026 in Crime No.165, which alleged offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 352, 351(2) of the Bhartiya Nagrika Suraksha Sanhita and Sections 3/4 of the Dangerous Drugs Act. The High Court …
The revisionist filed a criminal revision under the BNSS challenging the trial court's order rejecting a Section 319 CrPC application to summon two alleged participants, Tej Bahadur Singh and Vijayshri, in a dowry‑death case. The FIR alleged that the victim, Sarika, was subjected to dowry harassment …
The petitioner, Rahul Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case under Sections 30(a), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Bihar Excise Act alleging recovery of 20 litres of liquor near a brick kiln. He contended that the liquor was not in his possession, the recovery was based solely on …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in a case alleging dowry harassment, physical and mental cruelty, and assault on the petitioner and her minor daughter, with charges under several sections of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023. The prosecution alleged that after the marriage, the petitioner …
Birbal Yadav was arrested in 2007 after police seized 1.5 kg of narcotics and a country‑made pistol with ammunition. He was convicted under Sections 20(ii)(B) and 22(A) of the NDPS Act and sentenced to seven years rigorous imprisonment, a fine of Rs.40,000 and, in default of fine payment, an …
Suraj Kumar was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 8(c) and 21(B) of the NDPS Act for possession of 6.25 grams of smack, which is more than a small quantity but less than a commercial quantity. The co‑accused Javed Alam and Kundan Kumar were apprehended and their possessions …
The appellant, Wasima Khatoon, was charged with kidnapping a girl under several provisions of the Bihar Non‑tribal (BNSS) Act and the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC/ST) Act. The trial court rejected her anticipatory bail application. The appellant contended that she was falsely …
The petitioner, Himanshu Kumar, was named in an FIR relating to a sexual assault case involving a 14‑year‑old victim, where the FIR specifically alleges that Prince Kumar, son of Chandra Kishore Singh, committed penetrative rape. The petitioner contended that no allegation of penetrative assault was …
Sudhir Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail after the police registered a case (PS Madhepur Case No.150 of 2025) alleging offences under Sections 308(2) and 308(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The FIR claimed that Mukhiya and others extorted …
The petitioner, a government servant, sought anticipatory bail after an FIR was lodged alleging offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 69 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (B.N.S). The FIR claimed that the petitioner and the informant had discussed marriage six months earlier, and after the …
The petitioner, Birju Yadav, was implicated in a case under Sections 8(B), 18 and 29 of the NDPS Act for alleged involvement in opium cultivation on 24.99 acres of forest land. He contended that he has a clean antecedent and that the FIR does not disclose how his name was identified, arguing that …
