Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The state-owned Singareni Collieries Ltd., which supplies coal to both core (priority) and non‑core industries, issued Notification No. 3/96‑97 imposing a 20% surcharge on non‑core customers. The appellants, small‑scale coal‑using manufacturers, challenged the surcharge as arbitrary discrimination …
The Supreme Court examined whether the Coal Controller, exercising powers under Clause 8 (and 9) of the Colliery Control Order, 1945, could direct Central Coalfields Ltd. (CCL) to transfer allotted steam‑coal from Urimari and Jarangdih collieries to Sirka collieries, thereby overriding CCL's …
The State of Bihar prosecuted Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. for selling non‑metallurgical coal without a licence under the Bihar Trade Articles (Licence Unification) Order, 1984. Tata argued that, as a colliery governed by the Central Government's Colliery Control Order, 1945, the State Order could …
Bharat Coking Coal Ltd (appellant), a government-owned company, sold hard coke to Steel Abrasers & Allied Products Ltd (respondent) for foundry use. The Central Government, under the Colliery Control Order, 1945, issued a 1991 notification fixing prices for coke but allowing additional charges for …
