Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
4 judgments · newest first · showing 1–4
The petitioners, who purchased the entire 6‑9‑R land in two halves, sought to overturn an order that allowed the respondents to restrain excavation for a water tank despite an earlier temporary injunction in the petitioners' favor. The petitioners argued that their registered sale deeds gave them …
The petitioners challenged orders arising from proceedings under the Consolidation Act concerning a mutation entry. The High Court observed that such proceedings cannot be contested by way of an appeal, as the Act provides only an application mechanism under Sections 31A and 32. Consequently, the …
Petitioner Kameshwar Thakur filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking certiorari to set aside two orders: one dated 15 February 2018 issued by the Director of Consolidation, Bihar, and another dated 31 January 1998 issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Vaishali, both under the …
The Gram Panchayat of Sufipind claimed that plot No.71 was a pathway vested in it under Section 4(2) of the Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961. An application for realignment of the plot was filed in 1974, long after the consolidation proceedings had been completed in 1959. The …
