Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
8 judgments · newest first · showing 1–8
The petitioners sought a direction to the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Ghazipur to decide a revision filed under Section 48(1) of the Consolidation of Holdings Act concerning land in Arazi No.103. The revision arose after the respondent No.4 approved the petitioners' application for restoration …
The petition challenges three orders dated 11 July 2024, 26 November 2025 and 25 April 2026 issued by the Consolidation Officer (CO), the Sub‑Office Consolidation (SOC) and the District Deputy Commissioner (DDC) in Etah concerning the record of Khata No. 396 (Gata No. 864). The petitioner claims …
Munna Prasad Giri filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 20‑June‑2025 by the Settlement Officer of Consolidation, which altered his land parcels (plots 2, 5 and 12) without a hearing and allotted low‑lying land to him while assigning his original holdings to private respondents. The …
The petitioner challenged a series of orders relating to Khata No. 418 in Etah district, alleging that the Consolidation Officer’s (CO) order of 11 July 2024 allowing objections under Section 9 of the Consolidation of Holdings (CH) Act was improperly appealable and that the subsequent dismissal of …
The petitioners, Kamlesh Kumar and Smt. Ram Kali, who are holders of Chak No. 149 and Chak No. 1018 respectively, filed a writ petition challenging three orders issued by the Deputy Director of Consolidation, Pilibhit under Section 48(1) and Section 21(2) of the Consolidation of Holdings (CH) Act …
The petitioners, who were granted Sirdari leases in 1968 and whose mutation orders were recorded, sought a writ of mandamus directing the Consolidation Officer and revenue authorities to correct revenue entries in CH Form 11 and Form 23 and to prevent their eviction. The respondents argued that …
The petitioner, Chhidda Singh, filed a review petition (No. 315 of 1998) after the Supreme Court dismissed his Special Leave Petition (C) No. 6347 of 1997, which challenged orders of the Deputy Director of Consolidation and the High Court. The review petition merely reproduced verbatim the same …
Chukkhan, a Bhumidhar, bequeathed a life estate in his land to his wife, Gilia, and the remainder to their daughters. After Chukkhan's death Gilia took possession and later executed a will in favour of the appellants, Amar Singh and another. Upon Gilia's death a dispute arose whether the appellants …
