Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Constitution (42nd Amendment) Act, 1976

8 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

STATE OF TAMIL NADU, ETC. ETC.versusL. ABU KAVUR BAI AND ORS. ETC.

1983 INSC 16831 October 1983Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined the constitutionality of the Tamil Nadu Stage Carriages and Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1973, which sought to nationalise stage and contract carriage services and their assets. Operators challenged the Act as violative of Articles 14, 19 and 31, alleging it was confiscatory and lack

KERALA HOTEL & RESTAURANT ASSOCIATION AND ORS. ETC. ETC.versusSTATE OF KERALA AND ORS.

1990 INSC 5221 February 1990Dismissed

The Supreme Court examined the constitutional validity of provisions in the Kerala and Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Acts that taxed cooked food sold in luxury or star‑rated hotels while exempting the same in modest eating houses. Hoteliers challenged the classification as hostile discrimination violating Article 14. Th

MAHARAO SAHIB SRI BHIM SINGHJI ETC. ETCversusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ETC. ETC.

1980 INSC 21913 November 1980Dismissed

The petitioners, owners of vacant urban land, challenged the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 on grounds that several provisions violated Articles 14, 19(1)(f) and 31(2) of the Constitution and the basic structure doctrine. The Court examined the artificial definition of "family" in s.2(f), the compensatio

I. R. COELHO (DEAD) BY LRS.versusSTATE OF TAMIL NADU

2007 INSC 2811 January 2007Reference answered

The case arose from a reference concerning whether statutes placed in the Ninth Schedule after the Kesavananda Bharati judgment (24 April 1973) can enjoy absolute immunity from judicial review under Article 31B. The petitioners argued that such immunity would violate the basic structure doctrine by abrogating fundament

THE REGISTRAR GENERAL, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AND ANRversusSRI M. NARASIMHA PRASAD

2023 INSC 34210 April 2023Appeal(s) allowed

Sri M. Narasimha Prasad, a Civil Judge (Junior Division) of Karnataka, was suspended on allegations of gross misconduct and subjected to departmental inquiries. The Full Court of the Karnataka High Court, after finding several serious charges proved—particularly pronouncing the operative portion of judgments without th

SARV U.P. GRAMIN BANKversusMANOJ KUMAR SINHA

2010 INSC 909 February 2010Appeal(s) allowed

The respondent, a bank employee, was found guilty of financial irregularities, fraud and misappropriation and was punished with a reduction of pay after a departmental enquiry. The High Court set aside the punishment on the ground that the enquiry report had not been served to the employee, alleging a breach of natural

HARYANA FINANCIAL CORPORATION & ANR.versusKAILASH CHANDRA AHUJA

2008 INSC 7798 July 2008Case Allowed

Kailash Chandra Ahuja, a technical officer of Haryana Financial Corporation, was dismissed after a disciplinary inquiry in which the Inquiry Officer’s report was not furnished to him before the disciplinary authority imposed the penalty. The High Court set aside the dismissal on the ground that non‑supply of the report

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search