Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Constitution (Seventy-seventh Amendment) Act, 1995

5 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

JARNAIL SINGH & OTHERSversusLACHHMI NARAIN GUPTA & OTHERS

2018 INSC 88126 September 2018Reference answered

The Supreme Court examined a slew of petitions seeking a referral of the M. Nagaraj judgment to a larger bench, focusing on the validity of its requirement that States collect quantifiable data on the backwardness of Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) for promotion reservations. The Court held that while t

ROHTAS BHANKHAR & ORS.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR.

2014 INSC 48515 July 2014Appeal(s) allowed

The case concerned the validity of a 1997 Office Memorandum that withdrew an earlier 1970 order which had relaxed qualifying marks for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe candidates in departmental promotion examinations. The appellants argued that the withdrawal violated the constitutional provisions allowing reservat

B K PAVITRA AND ORS.versusTHE UNION OF INDIA AND ORS

2019 INSC 67110 May 2019Dismissed

The Karnataka government enacted the Karnataka Extension of Consequential Seniority to Government Servants Promoted on the Basis of Reservation Act, 2018 to grant consequential seniority to SC/ST promotees, after the earlier 2002 Act was struck down in *B K Pavitra I* for lacking the data required under *M. Nagaraj*. T

JANHIT ABHIYANversusUNION OF INDIA

2022 INSC 11757 November 2022Disposed off

The Constitution (One Hundred and Third Amendment) Act, 2019 amended Articles 15 and 16 of the Indian Constitution to empower the State to provide up to 10% reservation for 'economically weaker sections' (EWS) of citizens, excluding Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, and the non-creamy layer of Other Backward Classes.

THE STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS.versusDAVINDER SINGH & ORS.

2024 INSC 5621 August 2024Reference answered

The Supreme Court, by a 6:1 majority, overruled its earlier decision in E.V. Chinnaiah v. State of Andhra Pradesh and held that sub-classification of Scheduled Castes for the purpose of reservation is constitutionally permissible. The Court examined whether the Scheduled Castes constitute a homogenous class under Artic

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search