Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
7 judgments · newest first · showing 1–7
The applicant, Rajat Sahu, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a criminal complaint (M.A. No. 413 of 2023) alleging offences under Section 420 of the IPC and Sections 63/65 of the Copyright Act, which had been ordered to be dismissed by the Special …
The applicant Arvind Kumar Gupta filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS Act seeking discharge (उन्मोचन) in a criminal case (Criminal Appeal No 226/2025) pending before the Court of Judicial Magistrate‑First Class, Mirzapur. The applicant contended that he was innocent and that the order …
The petitioners, Nobroker Technologies Solutions Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition seeking quash of a criminal proceeding arising from a copyright infringement complaint and an FIR registered under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The dispute involved alleged infringement of copyrighted material, …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 12282 of 2025) arising under Section 318(4) of the B.N.S. and Section 63 of the Copyright Act. The applicant argued that he had not been …
The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Kamran Shah, who was arrested in connection with a 2019 case involving alleged counterfeiting of clothing and related offences under the IPC, Copyright Act and Trademark …
Akash applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 43 of 2025) where he was charged under Sections 347(1) B.N.S., 8/21, 23, 29 of the NDPS Act and Section 63 of the Copyright Act for alleged involvement in a drug‑smuggling incident. The FIR named three persons, two of whom were arrested on the spot; Akash …
The petitioner, Arjun Sah, sought bail after his godown was raided and counterfeit items were recovered, leading to charges under Sections 63 and 65 of the Copyright Act. He contended that he is innocent, resides in Assam, has no involvement in manufacturing the alleged counterfeit goods, and that …
