Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Cow Slaughter Act

46 judgments · newest first · showing 1–46

AZAM AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Azam and Smt. Amna applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, alleging false implication and that the seized 18 kg of meat was left on their doorstep by co‑accused without any independent witness. The State opposed the bail. The High Court noted that …

AYUSH MAHATOversusSTATE OF U.P.

Ayush Mahato, a driver, was arrested on 12 September 2026 under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Punishment for Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 109(1) of the BNS Act for allegedly transporting three live cattle for slaughter. The applicant contended that the …

HARICHARAN YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Haricharan Yadav applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, alleging that he and co‑accused were caught with three cattle for slaughter. The police recovered the cattle and arrested the accused on …

KALA @ UMARDARAJversusSTATE OF U.P.

The accused Kala @ Umardaraj applied for enlargement of bail in a case under Sections 109(1), 3(5) of the BNS and Sections 3, 5, 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act arising from an incident at Doghat, Baghpat. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, noting that no weapon was recovered, his name was …

MANISH BINDversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manish Bind applied for bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 71 of 2026) under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act. He was arrested on 28 August 2026 for allegedly transporting three cattle for slaughter, with the recovery made in …

ALEY HASANversusSTATE OF U.P.

Aley Hasan applied for bail in a case (Crime No. 209 of 2026) alleging violations of the Cow Slaughter Act and the Arms Act, stemming from an alleged firing on police where no police officer was injured but a co-accused, Javed, sustained a leg injury. The applicant claimed the recovered pistol, …

CHIMMAN @ NASIMversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

The petitioner filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 18.07.2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, and a writ of mandamus to restrain the State from arresting him. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel made an innocuous …

AADILversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Aadil, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 68 of 2026) involving alleged violations of Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act. The court noted that the applicant was not named in the FIR and his alleged involvement was based primarily …

SALMANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Salman, was charged under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act in a case registered at Airport police station, Prayagraj. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the evidence, and the submissions of counsel, noting that a co‑accused, …

SERAJUDDIN QURAISHI @ BACHAUversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Serajuddin Quraishi, was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act in Crime No. 0304 of 2026, Chandauli. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court examined the facts, the evidence, and noted that a co‑accused, …

SHAHRUKHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Shahrukh, accused in a murder case (Criminal Case No. 283 of 2024) under Sections 302, 201 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant argued that the FIR named him only because he was a friend of the prime accused, Arbaz, the husband of the deceased, and that …

ASHFAQ@ ASHWAAQversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ashfaq@ Ashwaaq, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 444 of 2026) under Section 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. He argued that he was not named in the FIR and that his alleged involvement stemmed only from a confessional statement of …

AMEER HUSAIN @AAMIR HUSSAIN AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case involving offences under Section 307 IPC and Sections 3, 5A, and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicants, and the learned Additional Government …

MANISH YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

Manish Yadav was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act in Crime No.126 of 2025. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, …

AJMERIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Ajmeri, was charged in Crime No.80 of 2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4 and 25 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The Court noted that a co‑accused, Hafiz, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and, …

SHAHAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

Shaham was charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 9(51) of the Wildlife Protection Act in Crime No. 95 of 2026. He applied for bail during the pendency of trial. The court examined the facts, the submissions of counsel, and noted that a co‑accused, Abdul Gaffar, had …

MOHD ASLAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Mohd Aslam, applied for bail in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The court noted that a co‑accused, Sunne @ Iliyas Khan, had already been released on bail in a similar case, and that the applicant had no prior criminal record. Relying on the principle of …

DANISHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Danish, was charged in Crime No.541 of 2026 under Section 109(1) of the BNS, Sections 3, 5Ka and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Animals Cruelty Act and Sections 3, 25 and 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail while the trial was pending. The court examined the …

AMAN KHANversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Aman Khan, who is charged in Crime No. 88 of 2025 under Sections 3, 8, 5 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Sections 4, 25 of the Arms Act. The applicant claimed innocence, …

CHHOTE AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Chhote and Farokh, who were accused in Crime No. 192 of 2019 for offences under Sections 429 and 269 of the same Act, as well as Sections 3, 5, 8 of the Cow Slaughter …

NADEEMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Nadeem, who was arrested in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act (Sections 3, 5, 8) and BNS (Section 3(5)). The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name appeared only in …

MOHD SHAMIMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Mohd Shamim, who was arrested in connection with offences under Sections 109(1) and 61(2) of the same Act, the Arms Act and the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed …

MULAYAM YADAVversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered the bail application of Mulayam Yadav, who was not named in the FIR but was later implicated for transferring money to a constable in a case alleged under the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that the transfer was a personal loan for a marriage and that there was no …

FIROZversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Firoz, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11 of the Animal Cruelty Act for allegedly transporting three cows in a bolero …

SARFRAZ AHMAD AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Sarfraz Ahmad and Shadab Ahmad who were charged under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicants claimed innocence, no prior criminal record, and that they were …

NAJAKATversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Najakat, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act for the alleged recovery of 30 cows. The applicant argued that he was not named …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for Raja Quraishi who was charged under the Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8), the Animal Cruelty Act (section 11) and Section 429 of the IPC. The applicant argued that no …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Raja Quraishi, who was charged under the Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8), the Animal Cruelty Act (section 11) and Section 429 of the IPC for allegedly …

VINOD PALversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Vinod Pal under Sections 2(b)(xi), 2(b)(xvii) and 3(1) of the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 in Crime No. 61 of 2026. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, had no conviction in the present case and was …

SAMSHULversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicant, Samshul, sought bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in a case registered under Sections 3 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act concerning the alleged disposal of cow carcasses. The FIR was lodged against unknown persons, and during investigation the …

AJAY SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Ajay Singh, who was arrested in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act for alleged cow slaughter in Bareilly. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, was not named in the FIR, and the only item recovered from him …

NAND KISHOR @ CHHOTUversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Nand Kishor alias Chhotu in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, noting that he was not named in the FIR and that the only alleged link was a rope recovered from his …

REKHAversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the BNSS by Rekha, who was implicated in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act (sections 3, 5A, 5B, 8) and the Animal Cruelty Act (section 11) for allegedly transporting ten cattle. The FIR was lodged on 5 April 2026 …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow slaughter offences. The applicant contended …

RAJA QURAISHIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Raja Quraishi, who was accused under Sections 3, 5A, 5B and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, Section 11 of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act and Section 325 of the Indian Penal Code for alleged cow‑slaughter offences. The applicant claimed the …

NADEEM KURAISHI @ BABLIversusSTATE OF U.P.

The Allahabad High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Nadeem Kuraishi, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant asserted that he was falsely …

NASIRversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court of Allahabad considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, for the accused Nasir in a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, no criminal record, and that no material was …

ASLAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, on behalf of Aslam, who was arrested in connection with a case under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that the FIR was lodged …

FARHAN QURESHIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

Petitioner Farhan Qureshi filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 20.01.2026 under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, alleging that he is a prospective accused though not named in the FIR. The State argued that the petition was not maintainable because the …

SONU @ KALIM @ ENAversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sonu @ Kalim @ Ena, who is charged under Section 109(1) of the B.N.S., Sections 3, 5 and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, and Sections 3, 25 and 28 of the Arms Act for allegedly firing at police and possessing a pistol, cartridges and cow meat. The …

ISLAMversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed by Islam, who was charged under Sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act and Section 11Gha of the Animals Cruelty Act. The applicant argued that he was not named in the FIR and was only implicated by a co‑accused’s statement, which the court …

VIVEK KUMAR SINGHversusSTATE OF U.P.

The High Court considered a bail application filed under section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 on behalf of Vivek Kumar Singh, who was arrested in connection with a case under sections 325 of the B.N.S., sections 3, 5A and 8 of the Cow Slaughter Act, and section 11 of the …

ISTEKAR AND ANOTHERversusSTATE OF U.P.

The applicants, Istekar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑07‑2019 and the entire proceeding under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Their contention was that the gangster case …

SMT SHAHNAJversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Smt Shahnaj, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 23 January 2023 and the cognizance order dated 29 September 2023 in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act. The High Court noted that the charges against the …

GOVIND KUMARversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

The applicant, Govind Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a cognizance order dated 29‑08‑2024 issued by the Judicial Magistrate, Chakiya, Chandauli, along with the accompanying charge‑sheet in a case under the Cow Slaughter Act and the Prevention of Cruelty to …

RASHID SIDDIQUIversusSTATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

Rashid Siddiqui, who has been granted anticipatory bail in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 504 and 506 IPC, applied for a No Objection Certificate (NOC) to renew his passport for Hajj and Umrah. The Special Judge rejected the NOC on the ground that his bail …