Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
88 judgments · newest first · showing 1–88
The Bombay High Court considered a bail application under Section 439 of the Criminal Procedure Code filed by Rohit Kamalakar Kamble, who had been in custody since October 2020 for alleged offences including murder, rioting, criminal conspiracy and violations under the Arms Act, Maharashtra Police …
The petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 24-04-2026 alleging his involvement in the death of Malu Ram Yadav and a writ of mandamus to restrain his arrest. The FIR, filed under Sections 103(1) and 238 of the B.N.S.S., alleged that the deceased had entered the petitioner’s …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Gaarad Nishad, who was arrested in connection with a case (Crime No. 89 of 2026) involving alleged assault, use of a country‑made pistol and iron rod, and injuries to the complainant. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging false implication …
Arman filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. challenging the order dated 23‑06‑2026 of the Additional Sessions Judge (POCSO Act)‑II, Hapur, which had rejected his request to recall the victim‑witness for further cross‑examination. The trial court observed that the accused had already …
The applicant, Chhotu @ Arun, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a notice and a Cr.P.C. order dated 19 January 2026 and 14 July 2026, as well as the pending criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the …
Petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 24‑07‑2026 that alleged offences under multiple sections of the Uttar Pradesh B.N.S. They contended that the dispute was civil in nature and that no offence was made out, seeking quash of the FIR. The respondents …
The applicant, Asheesh Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge-sheet, cognizance order and the entire criminal proceedings arising from FIR No. 29‑03‑2025, which alleged that he, along with co‑accused, verbally abused and assaulted the complainant's …
The applicant, Smt Rekha Devi, filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Firozabad, to decide Criminal Case No. 12050 of 2026, which involves offences under Sections 85, 115(2), 351(2), 352 of the BNS and Sections 3 …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hapur, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 833 of 2024) involving offences under Sections 323, 504, 506 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code. The …
The husband filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order dated 30.07.2026 in a Section 125(4) CrPC maintenance application filed by his wife. The husband contended that his wife, who was living separately, was engaged in adultery and therefore not entitled to maintenance. No …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S. Act seeking to quash a summoning order dated 14‑07‑2026 and the entire criminal proceeding (complaint case No. 17264/2024) that arose from a matrimonial dispute. The court observed that the dispute appears to be amenable to …
The applicant, Kahashari Begum, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS challenging an order dated 21 July 2026 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge) in Complaint Case No. M/326/12/2026, which rejected her earlier application. The High Court heard counsel for both …
Ramkailash Yadav and another filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS before the Allahabad High Court seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another. The court examined whether the application was sufficiently pressed. It held that the application was not pressed and therefore …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge-sheet dated 25.01.2023 and the cognizance order dated 01.03.2023 in a criminal case pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shamli. The application was supported by counsel but no …
The applicants filed an application under Section 529 of the BNSS seeking a direction to the Additional Principal Judge of Family Court‑1, Jaunpur, to decide a pending criminal case (Case No. 991 of 2022) under Section 128 of the Cr.P.C. within a stipulated time‑frame. The State opposed the prayer, …
The petitioner, Prakash Dwivedi, filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the police officials to conduct a fair and impartial investigation into Crime No. 222 of 2025 under specific provisions of the B.N.S., 2023 and the Criminal Procedure Code. The petitioner …
Smt. Huda Khanam filed an application under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance of Rs.30,000 per month after alleging dowry harassment, triple talaq and being thrown out of the matrimonial home. The Family Court awarded only Rs.2,500 per month, prompting her to file a criminal revision …
The applicant, Smt. Madhu, filed an application under Section 173(4) of the BNSS challenging an order dated 30.01.2026 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Moradabad, which had rejected her application. The High Court noted a preliminary objection raised by the learned Additional Government …
The applicants filed a Section 528 application in the Allahabad High Court seeking to quash a warrant, notice and order dated 02‑12‑2024 issued by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Special Judge, POCSO Act) in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 376, 366, 363 IPC and Section …
The appellants, Hirdesh and another, were accused under Sections 103(2), 352 and 115(2) BNS in a session trial and were ordered to forfeit personal bonds of Rs 1 lakh each after being absent when a witness was called on 04‑04‑2026. They sought an adjournment and later applied for recall of the …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition challenging an FIR dated 08‑03‑2026 registered under several sections of the BNS Act and the D.P. Act. The State argued that a charge‑sheet had already been filed under Section 173(2) of the Cr.P.C. and that the appropriate remedy was an …
The petitioner, Sushant Raj, was implicated in a case of alleged theft of transformer oil, but his name does not appear in the FIR. Villagers identified one co‑accused, Dilkhush Kumar, and gave only vague, uncorroborated statements that the petitioner was present, with no seized oil or direct …
The petitioner, Raja Mahto, was named in an FIR relating to alleged offences under several sections of the BNS and the POCSO Act, stemming from an incident where co‑accused Nitish Kumar and Kundan Kumar allegedly abducted two minor girls. The petitioner, who is the elder brother of Nitish Kumar, was …
The petitioner, Rajesh Kumar Singh, an accused in a POCSO case, filed a petition under Section 311 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the recall of witness PW‑6 for further cross‑examination, alleging that the witness had not been fully examined before the prosecution evidence was closed. The …
The petitioner, Vijay Rai, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a land‑fraud case (Garkha P.S. Case No. 632 of 2025) where the informant paid Rs. 6,50,000 to co‑accused Rakesh Kumar Singh for a plot of land that later turned out to have a defective title. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioner, Krishna Kumar, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a kidnapping case (PS‑750/2025) alleging the kidnapping of a minor under Sections 137(2) and 96 of the BNS. The victim’s statement under Section 183 BNSS did not support the prosecution’s claim and instead indicated she had married the …
Lotan Paswan was arrested in connection with Parsa Bazar PS Case No. 478 of 2025 for alleged assault on an informant under several sections of the BNS. The petitioner claimed innocence, arguing that no medical injury report existed to substantiate the alleged assault. The learned District Court had …
The complainant, Baba @ Baburam, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash the order dated 11 September 2025 passed by the Special Judge (SC/ST Act) which set aside a trial court summoning order and remanded the matter for fresh hearing. The trial court had earlier summoned …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash the charge sheet and summoning order issued by the Chief Judicial Magistrate in a case arising from alleged trespass and theft. They contended that the investigation was improper, the charge sheet was filed …
The appellant was stopped by police while riding a motorcycle and two large packets of cannabis (totaling 47 kg) were seized. He was charged under Sections 20B(ii)(C) and 22 of the Arms Act and sentenced to 20 years' rigorous imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the defence argued that the seizure …
The petitioner, Sita Devi, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a complaint alleging cheating under Section 318(4) of the Bihar Negotiable Instruments Act for selling a piece of land that later turned out to belong to the Government of Bihar. The petitioner claimed innocence and argued that the dispute is …
Ranno Devi filed a petition under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash an order of the Additional Sessions Judge who had treated her application under Section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. as a mere complaint. The applicant alleged that her daughter was enticed away by accused No.4 and No.5 on …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pushpendra Singh, who was in custody for offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120‑B of the IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and argued that the trial had not been concluded within 60 days of the first date fixed for taking evidence, …
Anjali Devi, mother of alleged co‑accused Solu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Muffasil P.S. No. 487 of 2024) alleging conspiracy to kidnap an informant’s niece and threats of violence under Sections 139 and 87 of the B.N.S. The prosecution opposed the bail, while the …
The petitioner, Prasanjit Kumar, was named in an FIR for alleged offences under Sections 118(2), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS after two minor boys were injured by a live electric wire in his father’s orchard. The prosecution argued that the petitioner failed to disconnect the supply despite prior …
Richa Bhargava was arrested in a case alleging non‑payment of Rs 35 lakh to the informant’s firm and was denied bail by the lower court. The applicant contended that the dispute was purely commercial, arising from a debt recovery issue, and that the FIR was an abuse of process lacking the mens rea …
The revisionist Rameshwar Pandey filed a criminal revision (No. 8972 of 2025) challenging an order dated 25‑09‑2025 of the Judicial Magistrate, Siddharth Nagar, which had allowed an application under section 175(3) of the BNSS to direct the police to register a FIR. The State raised a preliminary …
The petitioners, a group of individuals from Tehta Bazar, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20-12-2017 passed by the Sub‑divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323 …
The petitioner, Pintu Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 96 of the B.N.S. The informant alleged that Kumar kidnapped her minor daughter on 23 October 2025, but the victim later gave a statement under Section 183 CrPC …
Meghnath Mahato was named in an FIR for assaulting an informant with a "farsa" during a land dispute, allegedly causing head and bodily injuries. The petitioner argued that the incident was a mutual free fight, the injuries were simple, the FIR was filed three days after the incident without …
The petitioners, seven members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with PS Sangrampur Case No.130/2025, which alleged offences under multiple sections of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act, based on an FIR filed by Sunil Kumar. The prosecution …
Geeta Saini, accused in a 2024 case under sections 109(1), 3(5) and 93 of the B.N.S. for allegedly burying a newborn female child, applied for bail while in custody since November 6, 2024. She claimed innocence, argued that the FIR was based on overheard information, that there was no material …
Anirudh Mukhiya sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested under Sections 30(a) and 41(1) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 27.88 litres of liquor from a garden not in his possession. He argued that the allegation was based on a false …
The petitioner, Chunnu Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in connection with a case (PS Rajepur No. 246 of 2025) alleging his participation in an armed ambush that resulted in injuries to a driver and attempted murder of an informant. The FIR records allege that the petitioner assaulted the driver, …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 12‑10‑2023 and the entire criminal proceedings in Complaint Case No. 491 of 2023, which alleged offences under Sections 376D, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. They contended that the …
The applicant, Prabhakar Rai, filed an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking a stay of an execution order dated 30‑10‑2025 issued by the Family Court, Azamgarh, for recovery of outstanding maintenance of Rs. 3,16,000. The parties had earlier been directed to mediation, resulting in a …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a Judicial Magistrate’s order dated 15‑01‑2025 that proceeded against them under Sections 323 and 504 IPC. The charge‑sheet arose from a non‑cognizable report lodged on 07‑08‑2019, after which the magistrate directed …
The appellant, a complainant, challenged the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge who, while convicting the accused under Section 323 IPC, granted them probation for one year under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act and acquitted them of the charge under Section 504 IPC. The appellant …
The petitioners, two students, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Barh Police Station for offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109(1), 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, alleging a common intention to kill and assault on an informant and his associate. They contended that …
The petitioner, Aslam Alam, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Securities Act (BNS), alleging that he acted in self‑defence during a fight with the informant and his wife. The State opposed the …
The petitioner, Aasik Raza, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 140(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.S and Section 8 of the POCSO Act, alleging his involvement in the kidnapping of a minor. The informant claimed the minor was abducted …
The petitioners, three residents of Dafarpur village, were implicated in a kidnapping case under Sections 96 and 137(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 based on an informant’s FIR dated 17‑08‑2024. They contended that the FIR was filed three days after the alleged incident, that the victim voluntarily took …
The applicant, Smt Aruna, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to set aside a order of the Chief Judicial Magistrate who had treated her Section 173(4) application as a complaint rather than directing registration of a First Information Report (FIR) for an alleged assault and …
The petitioners, two young brothers aged 21 and 23, were implicated in a FIR for offences under Section 309(4) and later Section 317(2) of the Bihar Negotiable (BNS) Act, based on an informant’s claim that unknown assailants looted a tractor at gunpoint. They argued that the FIR named unknown …
Sunaina Devi applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 23 litres of liquor from a spot adjacent to her house. She contended that she has a clean antecedent, is a woman, and that the liquor was neither in her possession …
Hira Singh Pal filed a criminal revision challenging an order that directed the police to register an FIR under section 173(4) of the B.N.S.S. The State argued that the petitioner, being a prospective accused, lacked locus standi to file such a revision. The Court examined whether the order …
Manju Kumari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against her under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 36 litres of liquor from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she had no conscious possession of the liquor, that …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Complaint Case No. 661 of 2022 (Gauri Shankar v. Kamlesh Verma and others), which alleged an offence under Section 392 of the IPC. The parties had entered into a compromise deed, which was submitted …
Vishnu Kumar petitioned for bail in a case registered under Sections 310(3) and 317(5) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He was not named in the FIR and has been in custody since 8 June 2025. The only link to him is a confessional statement of a co‑accused, with no other incriminating …
The petitioner, Jaybindra Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a dowry harassment case (Sigori P.S. Case No.146 of 2024) where he was accused of torturing his wife for a dowry of Rs.15 lakh and land. He claimed innocence and inability to pay more than Rs.10,000 per month as interim maintenance to his …
The petitioners, Baiju Sahni and his wife Shila Devi, were named in an FIR for the murder of an informant's husband, alleged to have been caused by assault with an iron rod, spear and other weapons. Both sought anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash proceedings (Case No. 1671 of 2024) that arose from a protest petition treated as a complaint without following Section 223 of the BNSS. The investigating officer’s report found no sufficient evidence, yet the …
Shivnath Sah was arrested in connection with the murder of Rahul Kumar under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the BNS and has been in custody since 30‑08‑2025. The petitioner applied for bail, contending that the FIR was based solely on hearsay from an informant who was not an eye‑witness and that …
The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Sunil Singh, Munna Singh and Upendra Singh, who were implicated in a murder case (Basudeva PS Case No. 39/2025) under Section 103(1) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners were not named in the FIR; their alleged …
The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Sunil Singh, Munna Singh and Upendra Singh, who were implicated in a murder case (Basudeva PS Case No. 39/2025) under Section 103(1) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners were not named in the FIR; their alleged …
The High Court considered three bail applications filed by Sunil Singh, Munna Singh and Upendra Singh, who were implicated in a murder case (Basudeva PS Case No. 39/2025) under Section 103(1) of the BNS and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioners were not named in the FIR; their alleged …
Santosh Yadav was arrested in connection with Dinara Police Station Case No.146 of 2024 for alleged assault using a lathi, alleged to be with intent to cause death, under IPC sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 307, 504, 506 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He applied for bail, arguing that the incident was …
The petitioner, Ravi Ranjan Kumar, applied for bail in a case registered under Sections 310(3), 317(5) of the B.N.S and Section 27 of the Arms Act, alleging that he was not named in the FIR and had been in custody since 20 May 2025. The prosecution’s case relied solely on confessional statements of …
The petitioners, Akash Kumar and Ankit Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail after being named in a FIR alleging offences under several sections of the B.N.S., including assault and attempted murder. They argued that the allegations were largely general, that no pistol was fired and thus no intention …
Khushi Sharma applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a kidnapping case (Sections 137(2) and 96 of the B.N.S.) where the victim's daughter was allegedly abducted. The FIR alleges a conspiracy involving several accused, but the petitioner’s alleged role was limited to calling the …
The petitioner, a co‑villager, applied for pre‑arrest bail in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Negotiable Statutes (BNS) for alleged ransom demand, robbery and assault. The petition argued that the allegations against him were vague and that the specific charge of threatening …
The petitioner, Vibhesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 44, 45 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and Section 27 of the Arms Act. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not in possession of the seized liquor, and was not the …
Petitioners Suraj Kumar and Ranjit Jha were arrested in a case registered under multiple sections of the B.N.S. for alleged assault on an informant. The petitioners filed an anticipatory bail application, but later sought to withdraw the anticipatory bail for Ranjit Jha and surrender to obtain …
The petitioner, Dipak Chaudhary, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, where three litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a scooty he owned. He argued that he was not in possession of the liquor, was unaware of his …
The petitioner, Sunder Paswan, was charged under Sections 137 and 96 of the BNS for allegedly kidnapping the minor daughter of Kiran Devi, stealing cash and ornaments, and forcibly marrying her on 04.02.2025. The victim, a 16‑year‑11‑month‑old girl, recorded statements under Sections 180 and 183 of …
The petitioners sought anticipatory bail in connection with an assault case (Kargahar P.S. Case No. 76 of 2025) alleging offences under sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the BNS. The informant claimed the accused assaulted him and his family on 13.03.2025, but the petitioners argued that …
Santosh Kumar was accused of taking and selling an informant’s motorcycle, alleged under Sections 316(2) and 318(4) of the B.N.S. The FIR was lodged ten days after the informant’s enquiry, and the motorcycle was later seized in an excise case where the informant’s husband was an accused. The …
The petitioners, five members of the Yadav family, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under multiple sections of the Bihar Special Penal Code (BNS) for alleged firing, assault, and conspiracy. They contended that the allegations were false, that injuries were either …
Arsheala Faridi applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 103(1) and 61(2) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed the bail, arguing that proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure Code had already been …
Monu Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 103(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed, arguing that criminal proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Cr.P.C. were already pending and that the …
Monu Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case involving offences under Sections 109(1), 61(2), 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The State opposed, arguing that criminal proceedings under Sections 82 and 83 of the Criminal Procedure …
The petitioner, Abhishek Mohan Jha, was charged under Sections 69, 115(2), 126(2), 351(2) and 352 of the B.N.S. for allegedly sexually exploiting a woman on a false pretext of marriage for eight years. He contended that the relationship was consensual, noting that he is the cousin of the woman's …
Rocky Kumar was arrested on 11 September 2025 in connection with FIR dated 17 August 2025 alleging offences under Sections 96, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S., purportedly for enticing a girl and taking her away to solemnise a marriage. The petitioner claimed a clean antecedent and argued that the …
The petitioner, Prashant Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the BNSS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of 36.75 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. He contended that the …
Petitioner Pikesh Kumar sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for alleged recovery of 180.750 litres of liquor from his vehicle. He argued that he was not in possession at the time of seizure, that the …
The petitioner, Chandan Kumar, sought anticipatory bail in a case where he was accused of multiple offences under the B.N.S., 2023 and the POCSO Act, including sexual assault of a 16‑year‑old girl, alleged forced termination of pregnancy, and related offences. The prosecution alleged that the …
The petitioners, Vipin Sah and Priti Devi, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a dowry‑related murder case (Singhwara P.S. Case No. 189 of 2025) under Sections 80, 303(2) and 61(2) of the BNS. The prosecution alleges that they, along with co‑accused, tortured and strangulated the …
Manoj Kumar Bedpuriya filed an application seeking to quash the order dated 11 May 2015, which dismissed his criminal revision and upheld a lower court order dated 4 March 2013. The High Court examined the petition and noted that the petitioner could raise all relevant grounds under Section 319 of …
