Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
29 judgments · newest first · showing 1–29
The appellant, Vishal Premnarayan Chaturvedi, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh …
The appellant, Dharmeshbhai Hasmukhbhai Mehta, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court, referring to its earlier decision in Shivsinh …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the respondents. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The High Court referred to its earlier decision …
The appellant Gopalbhai Jamatani filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita against a trial court's acquittal. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. …
The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. …
The appellant, Hakim Singh Churasinh Rajput, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the recent …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State …
The appellant filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS challenging the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of …
The appellant, Gujarat State Co‑operative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd., filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court’s acquittal of the respondents on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court …
The appellant, a complainant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, challenged the trial court's acquittal of the accused. The issue was whether, as a victim, the complainant could appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 BNSS or must use the victim‑specific remedy under the …
The Gujarat State Co‑op. Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd. appealed against the trial court's acquittal of Ratansinh Chandansinh Vaghela under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha …
M/s Padmavati Corporation, represented by proprietor Jashvantlal Shah, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in …
M/s Padmavati Corporation, represented by proprietor Jashvantlal Shah, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court’s acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant filed the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (and the analogous provision in …
The appellant, who is both the complainant and the victim under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, appealed the trial court's acquittal. The issue was whether the appeal should be filed under Section 378 of the CrPC as a complainant or under the proviso to Section 372 (Section 413 of the …
The appellant filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court examined the recent decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat, which, relying on …
The Gujarat State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Ltd appealed an acquittal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, arguing that as a complainant it could file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (or Section 419 of the BNSS). The High Court referred to its earlier …
Mohammed Imtiyaz Harun, partner of Venus Valves Industries, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant argued that, as a complainant, he could file an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC (or …
The Gujarat State Cooperative Agriculture and Rural Development Bank appealed against the trial court's acquittal of the State of Gujarat under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appellant, also the complainant, sought to file the appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC as a …
The appellant, Jyoti Satyanarayan Vishvkarma, filed an appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the respondents in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the precedent set in Shivsinh …
Shriram Finance Ltd., through its power of attorney, appealed to the Gujarat High Court against the acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting …
The appellant, Ambalal Shah & Sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 CrPC and Section 419 BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The issue was whether a complainant who is also a victim could appeal under Section 378 (as a …
The appellant, Ambalal Shah and Sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory framework governing appeals by a …
The appellant, Ambalal Shah and Sons, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory position that a complainant who is …
Patel Vishnubhai Chandubhai appealed under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the BNSS against his acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court referred to its earlier decision in Shivsinh Ganpatsinh Solanki v. State of Gujarat and the Supreme Court …
The appellant, Rameshbhai Ribadiya, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory framework …
The appellant, Rameshbhai Ribadiya, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378 of the CrPC and Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita challenging the trial court's acquittal on a charge under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The High Court examined the statutory framework …
The Deesa Navnirman Bachat and Dhiran Sahakari Mandali Ltd appealed against the trial court's acquittal in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, asserting the right to …
Shriram Finance Ltd, through its power of attorney, appealed the trial court's acquittal of the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The appeal was filed under Section 378 of the CrPC/Section 419 of the BNSS, asserting the complainant's right to challenge the acquittal. The …
