Created by Fuzzy Cloud | Our 2nd AI-Powered Solution
17749 judgments · newest first · showing 8201–8400
The applicant, Ahmad Hasan, filed a second bail application in a criminal case (Crime No.0244 of 2023) involving charges under Sections 498-A and 304-B of the IPC and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The trial is near its conclusion, with the accused's statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. …
The applicant, Govind, filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking release from four separate criminal cases by furnishing a single personal bond and two sureties. The four cases involved offences under Section 309(4) of the B.N.S. and one case under …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Naim Khan (applicant) under Section 64(1) of the CrPC in connection with offences under Sections 123 and 351(3) of the IPC. The applicant claimed he was falsely implicated, pointing out inconsistencies in the FIR dates and lack of photographic or …
The applicants, Ram Bahadur and four others, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against them in a private complaint case involving offences under IPC sections 354-A, 323, 504 and 506. The High Court examined the …
The applicant, Akash Saini, sought bail in a criminal case (Crime No. 229 of 2025) alleging false implication. He argued that the FIR was filed more than a day after the alleged incident and that he was first mentioned only in a delayed statement by a relative of the informant. No other evidence …
The petitioners sought a writ of certiorari to quash an FIR dated 08.02.2026 and a writ of mandamus to restrain their arrest. The FIR alleged offences under several sections of the B.N.S. and described a violent brawl resulting in grievous injuries. The Court examined the scope of its power under …
The applicant Aman, the brother-in-law of a deceased woman, filed a bail application in a case registered under Sections 498A, 304B of the IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. He contended that the allegations against him were false, that the post‑mortem indicated death by hanging, …
Petitioner No.1 was arrested on 08.02.2026 by the police without being furnished written grounds of arrest, contrary to Supreme Court pronouncements. The arrest memo and the subsequent remand order were prepared on a printed proforma, indicating a mechanical exercise of power. The petitioners …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Pankaj @ Shankar, who is accused in Crime No. 740 of 2021 for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 323, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The applicant contended that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was assigned to him, and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the summoning order dated 07.05.2019 and the entire criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 5597 of 2018) relating to offences under Sections 323, 324, 354, 354B and 452 of the IPC. Both parties …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an ex‑parte order dated 10 October 2017 passed by the Additional Session Judge, which had allowed the opposite party, Smt. Gulnaj Bano, to reside in a house. The order arose from an appeal against an …
The applicant, Jahid Urf Jahanain, filed a bail application in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2021) involving offences under Sections 364, 302, 201, 394 and 411 of the IPC. He claimed innocence, argued that his four‑year pre‑trial detention violated his Article 21 rights, and asserted that he …
The applicants and the State entered into a compromise concerning criminal case No. 6186 of 2016, which involved offences under IPC sections 420, 467, 468 and 471. The compromise was verified by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate on 21‑01‑2026, and both parties and the A.G.A. raised no …
The applicant filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking a direction to the Additional Civil Judge (Judicial Magistrate) in Moradabad to conclude Criminal Case No. 254 of 2013 (State vs. Sandeep Khanna) expeditiously. The applicant argued that the trial was pending …
The revisionist, Mohammad Shamshir Khan, challenged a family court order dated 20 October 2016 that awarded Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance, claiming it was ex parte and beyond his means. He also contested the family court’s dismissal of his application under Section 126(2) Cr.P.C. on 24 …
The applicants filed a Section 482 Cr.P.C. application seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 3578 of 2019) relating to offences under Sections 419, 420, 467 and 468 IPC. Both the applicants and the second opposite party had amicably settled the dispute and the latter expressed no desire to …
The applicant, Sanjay Chhawara, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of U.P. and another party. The applicant's counsel was Bed Kant Mishra, while the respondents were represented by G.A., Surendra Kumar, and Virendra Singh Yadav. The …
The applicant, Sher Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking relief. During the hearing, the applicant's counsel, Ram Kumar Dubey, indicated that the applicant no longer wished to pursue the matter, stating that the application had become infructuous. …
The applicant, a minor, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 12‑April‑2024 passed in Criminal Case No. 92 of 2024. The order concerned a direction under Section 156(3) CrPC issued by the Circle Officer, Harsh Pandey. During the …
The applicant, Gulam Sabir Azad, filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Counsel for both parties appeared before the High Court, Allahabad. The court, at the request of the applicant's counsel, listed the matter afresh for 10 July 2026. An earlier interim order was …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of charge sheet No.31/2024 relating to offences under Sections 498A, 323, 506 IPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The matter was referred to the Court’s Mediation Centre, which …
The revisionist Smt. Anam Zafar Shamsi filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the CrPC challenging the Family Court's dismissal of her maintenance application. She alleged that the Family Court ignored the substantial income of the opposite party No.2, who runs two shops in Pilibhit, and …
Bhagwan Das filed a criminal revision challenging the trial court’s order granting Rs 3,000 per month maintenance and a Rs 5,00,000 one‑time compensation to his wife under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, and the appellate court’s affirmation of the same. The revisionist …
Sindhu Saran appealed the Family Court's order granting his wife Rs 5,000 and his daughter Rs 3,000 per month as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC. He argued that he is a labourer with limited earnings and that the court’s finding of his income was vague and unsupported, making the total award of …
The applicant, Karan Rathore, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking quash of criminal proceedings (S.T. No. 480 of 2023) instituted under IPC sections 323, 328, 504 and 506. The applicant had deposited Rs. 15.50 lakhs as directed by the court, part of which …
The applicants, including an advocate and his family members (two minors), filed a Section 482 application to quash Complaint No. 2731/2022 alleging that the neighbour‑complainant fabricated allegations of assault and molestation. The Judicial Magistrate had summoned the applicants under IPC 354, …
The applicant, Bittu, was arrested in connection with the death of his wife, who allegedly committed suicide by hanging within 11 months of their marriage, which was arranged under a government scheme. The prosecution alleged that Bittu tortured the deceased to extort money and a motorcycle, but the …
The appellants, Balak Chand Bind and two others, appealed a trial court order that summoned them under Section 319 CrPC based on an application under Section 44(Kha). The trial court had relied on the statement of PW‑1, Pappu, who admitted he was not present at the incident, to justify the summons. …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 24‑04‑2018 and related criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 323, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504 and 506 IPC, on the ground that the dispute had been amicably settled and a compromise was …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 147, 148, 323, 504, 506, 452, 427, 325 and 308 IPC. The parties had reached a compromise, which was verified by the Additional Civil …
Sunehri Singh appealed to the Allahabad High Court against a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 5,000 per month as maintenance for his two minor daughters under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He contended that the amount was excessive, asserting that his income from tuition work …
The applicant, Asif Ali, filed a supplementary affidavit on 4 November 2025 in the High Court of Allahabad. The court directed the registry to locate the affidavit and place it on record. The registry reported that no such affidavit was found in the records. The applicant’s counsel requested …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order dated 24‑12‑2020 and the charge sheet dated 28‑01‑2018 in a case involving offences under Sections 324, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. Both parties had entered into a compromise on 07‑09‑2024, which was …
The applicants, Sudhakar and four others, filed an application under Section 528 BNSS seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No.1518 of 2025) arising from FIR No.282 of 2024 that alleged offences under sections 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(4) and 191(2) of the BNS Act. They contended that the FIR …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a chargesheet dated 18.05.2018 and related criminal proceedings (Case No.7641 of 2018) involving offences under Sections 323, 504 and 325 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the compromise was …
The wife filed a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 alleging physical, mental and economic abuse and sought interim maintenance under Section 23. The trial court granted modest interim maintenance, which was partially modified by the District & …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash Criminal Case No.21 of 2017 (State vs. Iqbal and others), which involved offences under Sections 406, 452, 504 and 506 of the IPC. The parties had already reached a compromise, which was verified by …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet dated 23‑12‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑09‑2025 in State v. Nizam & others (Case No. 6678 of 2025), which involved offences under Sections 74, 352, 115(2), 126(2), 131 and …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the chargesheet and subsequent criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No. 319 of 2010) relating to offences under Sections 307, 504 and 506 IPC. The parties had amicably settled the dispute, and the …
Ram Kumar filed an FIR alleging that his son Ankit Srivastav was assaulted. The charge‑sheet filed by the police omitted Ankit as a witness. Ram Kumar applied to the magistrate for further investigation under Sec. 173(8)/193(3) CrPC, but the magistrate rejected the application twice, first on the …
The applicants, Saurabh Sonkar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking the quashing of a charge sheet dated 9‑December‑2019 and the cognizance order dated 3‑March‑2023 in Criminal Case No. 14315 of 2023, arising from FIR Crime No. 369 of 2019 under …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash criminal proceedings (Case No. 13598/9 of 2024) arising from offences under Sections 115(2) and 351(2) of the Indian Penal Code. The parties had reached an amicable compromise, which was verified on …
The applicants challenged the chargesheet and cognizance order in a criminal case (State v. Shobh Nath et al.) alleging false implication and undue delay in filing the FIR. They argued that the alleged offence occurred on 14‑06‑2020 but the FIR was lodged on 17‑08‑2020, and that the injury was …
The High Court considered a second bail application filed by Neeraj alias Neeru, who is accused in Crime No.148 of 2023 under IPC sections 307, 506, 34 and Arms Act sections 3, 25, 27. The first bail plea was dismissed for lack of prosecution, and the applicant argued that he was falsely implicated, …
The applicant, Akanksha Soni, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 29‑09‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 13‑05‑2025 in a case filed under Sections 323 and 504 of the IPC. The sole contention was that the offences are …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528/482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the cognizance and summoning order dated 23.11.2020 and the entire criminal case (Case No. 2430 of 2020) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Farrukhabad, which alleged offences under Sections 147, 452, …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 25‑07‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 21‑10‑2024 in a Special Session Trial under the U.P. Gangster and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The High Court examined …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash charge sheet No.24 of 2020 and the entire criminal proceedings (S.T. No.100 of 2024) arising from Crime No.17 of 2020, which involved offences under sections 323, 324, 325, 308, 452, 504 and 506 of …
Deepak Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita seeking to quash Criminal Case No. 44583, alleging that he was falsely implicated for allegedly uploading a video on Facebook. The State argued that an FIR under Section 318(4) of the BNSS and Section 66‑D of the …
The applicant, Vinod Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the CrPC seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 13‑01‑2026 and a cognizance/summoning order dated 18‑07‑2026 in a special trial under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act. He argued that …
The applicants, Istekar and another, filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to quash a charge‑sheet dated 31‑07‑2019 and the entire proceeding under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. Their contention was that the gangster case …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. During the hearing, counsel for the applicants informed the court that they no longer wished to pursue the application. The court noted that the application had become infructuous due to the …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Sher Mohammad, who was accused under several CrPC provisions and Section 6 of the POCSO Act for alleged rape. The applicant claimed innocence, alleging that the victim, with whom he had a consensual relationship, later made false accusations …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 20372 of 2018) arising from FIR No. 278 of 2017, which alleged offences under numerous sections of the Indian Penal Code, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act and …
The applicant, Dharmendra, filed a bail application under sections 137(2), 87 of the Criminal Procedure Code, and section 65(2) of the Indian Evidence Act in connection with FIR No. 259/2025. He alleged that the prosecution’s case was based on false statements, citing sections 180 and 183 of the …
The Allahabad High Court entertained two applications: one seeking amendment to delete applicants 1‑6 from the party list, and another under Section 528 of the CrPC on behalf of applicants 7‑16 to quash the charge‑sheet and obtain protection from arrest. The court found no objection from the State …
The High Court considered a bail application filed by Dharmendra Kumar Saroj in a case registered under Sections 137(2), 87, 64(1) of the CrPC and Sections 3 and 4 of the POCSO Act. The applicant claimed false implication, pointing out the FIR was lodged six days after the alleged incident and that …
The applicant, Sunny Divakar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Complaint Case No. 1612 of 2022) pending before the Judicial Magistrate, Khaga, which involved offences under Sections 323, 406, 356 and 506 of the IPC. The …
The applicant Suraj Kumar filed a bail application in the Allahabad High Court while the trial was at the stage of recording his statement under Section 313 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The status report indicated that the trial was at the “fag end” with the statement recording scheduled for 30 …
The petitioner, Sunil Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a FIR alleging fraud and other offences under Sections 316(2), 336(3), 338, 318(4) and 3(5) of the Bihar Negotiable Sale Act, 2023, relating to a disputed land sale. He claimed to have a clean record and asserted that …
The petitioner, Mukesh Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under several IPC sections for alleged assault and robbery. He contended that the FIR was based on a non‑eyewitness informant and that he was falsely implicated, asserting no relation to the alleged victim …
The petitioner, Abhishek Kharwar, applied for anticipatory bail in a case alleging violation of Section 317(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 44 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He asserted that he has a clean antecedent, was not …
Petitioner Radha Kumari Patel, an ex‑Mukhiya, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash FIR No. 15 of 2024, which alleged offences including assault, attempt to murder and offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The prosecution alleged …
The petitioners, Indrajeet Kumar Yadav and Kameshwar Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged possession of 45 litres of liquor. They argued that the liquor was found in a joint family house, they had no …
The petitioner, Musaraf Ali, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for allegedly recovering 13.68 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that he was not caught in possession, was not the owner of the vehicle, and his name does not appear in the FIR, asserting a …
Mirdula Devi, a resident of Vaishali district, applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where 5 litres of liquor were allegedly recovered from a motorcycle she owned. She argued that she has a clean …
The petitioner, Subodh Kumar Verma, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Sections 30(a), 32(3) and 37 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 400 ml of liquor in a car he owned. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Laxman Mandal, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, where liquor was allegedly recovered from his house and a co‑resident's house. He argued that he was not arrested on the spot, that the …
The petitioner, Sanoj Kumar, feared arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging that 90 litres of liquor were concealed near a community hall. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his possession, and the …
The petitioner, Sohan Singh, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under Sections 30(a), 30(d) and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 for alleged recovery of 50 litres of liquor and 2,000 litres of fermented Jawa Mahua solution. He contended that he was not …
Ravindra Kumar Singh, the owner of a vehicle from which 179.98 litres of liquor were recovered, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. He argued that he was not present at the spot of seizure, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that his driver misused …
The petitioner, Sandeep Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, involving alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He argued that the seizure was not from his …
The petitioner, Birendra Thakur, owner of a vehicle from which 360 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act and Sections 272, 273 and 34 of the IPC. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of …
Munna Kumar and Amarjeet Rai applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case registered under IPC Sections 272, 273/34 and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, alleging recovery of liquor from a motorcycle and a Santro. They contended that they were not arrested on the spot, …
The petitioner, Laxman Yadav, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Sections 274, 275 and 3(5) of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging that no liquor was recovered from his possession and that he is not the owner of the seized …
Guddu Kumar, accused under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for alleged recovery of 8,769.6 litres of liquor from a truck, applied for anticipatory bail, claiming he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was not the owner of the vehicle. He …
The petitioner, Dheeraj Sahani, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act, alleging recovery of 40 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not arrested on the spot, no liquor was …
The petitioner, Sashikant Yadav, sought anticipatory bail after apprehending arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act for allegedly possessing 75 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle. He contended that he was not the owner of the vehicle, that the liquor …
Mannu Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with alleged offences under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act, where recovery of 30 litres of liquor each from two locations was alleged. The petitioner, who has three prior cases under the Excise …
Arfa Devi, the petitioner, feared arrest in a case registered under Sections 274 and 275 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act read with Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 14.25 litres of liquor from a motorcycle. She contended that she had no conscious possession of …
The petitioners, six residents of Slaempur village, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022 concerning the alleged recovery of 250 litres of liquor from a sack near the Kumhari River. They contended that the …
The petitioner, Mohammad Majid, was implicated in a case alleging that 408.960 litres of liquor were recovered from his Creta car, leading to charges under Sections 281 and 324(4) of the B.N.S and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. He contended that he was not present at the …
The petitioner, Raj Kishor Singh, was implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 10 litres of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he was not arrested at the spot, had no conscious possession of the liquor, and was unaware that another person, …
Ram Kumar Singh sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for alleged recovery of 159.48 litres of liquor from a banana orchard adjacent to his house. The allegation was based solely on a confessional statement made by Ganesh while in police custody, which …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 17 March 2018 of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate‑8, Darbhanga, which had taken cognizance of offences under Sections 364, 365, 211 and 120(B) of the …
Gajendra Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. after a case was registered against him for alleged contravention of Section 30(a) of the Excise Act involving the recovery of 7.5 litres of liquor from his car. He contended that he had a clean antecedent, was not in …
The petitioner, Ashish Singh Bhadouria, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case alleging possession of 750 litres of liquor recovered from a Hyundai car registered in his father's name. He contended he had a clean antecedent and was unaware that his brother had misused the vehicle. The …
Guddu Kumar Mahto sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 15 litres of liquor near his kiosk. He argued that he had a clean antecedent, the liquor was not in his …
The petitioner, Bipin Kumar, was implicated in a case (PS Paharpur Case No 684 of 2025) for allegedly possessing 23.04 litres of liquor, an offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. He contended that the liquor was recovered from a joint‑family …
The petitioner, Baby Devi, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 156 litres of beer and 51.75 litres of liquor from two cars and a motorcycle. She contended that she was not present at the spot of seizure, …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under the Excise Act alleging offences under Sections 30(a), 32, 41, 56(b) and 62, involving the alleged recovery of 88.56 litres of liquor from his shop. He argued …
The petitioner, Ravi Kumar, sought anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2018 for allegedly possessing 15 litres of liquor recovered from a motorcycle he owned. He argued that he had no prior criminal record, was …
The petitioner, Md. Sahid Alam, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Sections 30(a) and 32(3) of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 500 ml of liquor from his motorcycle. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Sugrim Prasad, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 20.9 litres of liquor from his shop and godown. He argued that he has a clean antecedent, …
Ankush Kumar applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with offences under Sections 30(a), 32(3), 41(1) and 41(2) of the Excise Act, alleging that liquor was recovered from a driver’s vehicle and a cowshed owned by him. He contended that he was not …
Laxman Dhari applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Cr.P.C. in a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 15 litres of liquor from his joint family house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested at the spot, no liquor was found in his …
Arjun Paswan applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act alleging recovery of 6.8 litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that he has a clean antecedent, was not arrested at the spot, and the …
The petitioners, Raju and Jitendra Manjhi, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for the alleged recovery of 110 litres of liquor from a premises adjacent to petitioner 1’s house. They …
The petitioner, Deepak Kumar, applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 80 litres of liquor from his scooty. He argued that he was not in possession of the vehicle …
The petitioner, Nitish Kumar, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an interim maintenance order dated 13-02-2018 passed by the Principal Judge of the Family Court, Nalanda. The petitioner argued that the maintenance case …
The petitioner, Aahid Alam, applied for anticipatory bail anticipating arrest in a case alleging offences under Section 317(5) of the B.N.S. and Sections 30(a), 32(2) and 41 of the Excise Act for allegedly recovering 216 litres of liquor from three motorcycles. He argued that he has a clean …
The petitioner, Hema Devi, owner of a motorcycle from which 50 litres of liquor was seized, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Excise Act. She argued she had a clean antecedent, was not present at the spot of seizure, and was unaware of her friend's alleged …
Ram Kumar Singh applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of 74.4 litres of liquor from a bush adjacent to his house. The petitioner argued that he was not arrested, …
Sudin Kumar Ram sought anticipatory bail after learning that he might be arrested in a case under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022, alleging recovery of 7.875 litres of liquor from a mango orchard not owned by him. He argued that he was not caught in possession …
Birendra Yadav applied for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case registered under Section 30(a) of the Excise Act for alleged recovery of nine litres of liquor. The petitioner argued that the liquor was recovered from a public place, not from …
The petitioner, Sony Pandey, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 23 August 2018 passed by the Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, which had set aside a previous order and directed the production of minor children before a …
Avinash Kumar Sharma and his father Pawan Kumar Sharma sought anticipatory bail after a complaint was lodged against them under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC alleging misappropriation of money from SBI customers. The complainant, Ritik Kumar, claimed the petitioners collected deposits and issued …
The petitioners, M/s S.A. Glass and its proprietor S.Q. Hassan, filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the order of cognizance and summons dated 15 March 2016 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, XI, Bhagalpur in …
The petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash an order dated 20‑09‑2017 in which a complaint (Case No.108 of 2017) was taken cognizance of under IPC Sections 147, 323 and 379. The learned magistrate’s report indicated …
Anant Kumar Singh filed a criminal miscellaneous application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the order dated 23 July 2018 passed by a Special Judge, which had rejected his Section 311 application to recall witnesses. He contended that the matter had become …
The appellant Baliram Singh alleged that on 10 January 2012 he and his son were attacked by six accused in a land‑dispute, resulting in his son's death. The trial court acquitted the accused, finding the prosecution had failed to prove the crime beyond reasonable doubt. On appeal under Section 372( …
The petitioners sought to quash an order dated 28-10-2016 by the S.D.M., Rosera, which converted a proceeding under section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code to one under section 145, and also to set aside a subsequent order of the Additional Sessions Judge dismissing the petition. The petition …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, a 17‑year‑old juvenile, was accused of participating in the gang rape of a 16‑year‑old girl. He applied for bail under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, which was rejected by the Juvenile Justice Board and upheld by the …
The appellant, Shashi Singh, was charged under several IPC offences (307, 379, 341, 323, 504, 143) and sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 2(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with an alleged assault and robbery at the complainant's residence. He applied for anticipatory bail, which …
The petitioner, Sumit Kumar, a 17‑year‑old at the time of the alleged incident, was accused of participating in the gang‑rape of a 16‑year‑old girl. The Juvenile Justice Board denied his bail application under Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, a decision …
The appellant, Mantu Tiwari, was charged under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and several IPC offences for allegedly receiving a bribe of Rs. 22,000 in connection with a land mutation dispute. He sought anticipatory bail, arguing his clean antecedents, that a co‑accused government servant …
The appellants, Ranjan Kumar and Pankaj Kumar, were charged under multiple provisions of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act in connection with a dispute over a vehicle purchase where the informant alleged caste-based abuse. The informants claimed that after a …
Abdul Mannan and Abdul Hannan appealed against the Special Judge's order rejecting their anticipatory bail in a case filed under several sections of the B.N.S. and the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. The informant alleged that the appellants had taken a loan …
The petitioner, Anarul Hak, was accused of kidnapping the minor daughter of an informant in a case registered under Section 376 of the IPC and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act. The victim was later recovered and, in a statement recorded under Section 164 of the CrPC, denied the kidnapping and …
Md. Asgar Ali applied for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged seizure of 1,198 litres of codeine syrup, alleged under IPC sections 272-276 and NDPS Act section 21(b). He argued that he was not named in the FIR, that the seized consignment was intended for a rival medical shop, and that …
The petitioner, Sanjay Kumar Yadav, applied for anticipatory bail after being implicated in a case (PS Case No. 298 of 2022) involving kidnapping of a minor girl for the purpose of marriage. The prosecution alleges that the petitioner, along with others, abducted the child and solemnized her …
Five individuals from Pokhraira, Muzaffarpur, feared arrest in a case registered under IPC sections 147, 148, 149, 354, 307, 504 and 34 alleging assault and theft of a mangalsutra. They contended that the case was a fabricated retaliation against an earlier complaint they had filed, and that the …
The petitioner sought regular bail in a case alleging kidnapping of a minor and offences under sections 137(2) of the BNS Act and sections 8 and 12 of the POCSO Act. The prosecution claimed the petitioner abducted the informant's minor daughter, but the victim’s statement under Section 180 of the …
Sanjoy Yadav filed a Miscellaneous Application under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 challenging an order dated 17‑10‑2024 that granted his mother relief under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The appellant relied on a Full Bench decision in Dr. Dilip Kumar Sharma v. State of …
The petitioners, Pintu Kumar Ray and his father Singasan Ray, filed anticipatory bail applications in connection with FIR No. 583 of 2025 alleging assault and robbery. The first petitioner withdrew his application, while the second sought bail, claiming a clean antecedent and that the FIR only …
The petitioners, Ravis Kumar Raju and Pramod Kumar Sharma, were arrested in a case registered under Sections 409, 420, 406 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. They filed a petition seeking provisional bail, fearing continued detention. The High Court examined the nature of the offences, the amount of …
The petitioners were accused of cheating and criminal breach of trust for issuing dishonoured cheques for the purchase of steel bars, leading to a criminal complaint under Sections 406, 420 and 114 of the IPC and Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. They filed a Section 239 Cr.P.C. …
The original complainant filed a criminal complaint alleging offences under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114 IPC and the accused obtained anticipatory bail on 22 July 2019 with conditions. The complainant later sought cancellation of that bail, claiming the accused, a public‑servant clerk, …
The appellant, a police officer, was convicted under Section 307 IPC and the Arms Act for shooting a Sub‑Inspector during a night patrol in 1981. He appealed, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove the requisite intent to murder, that the investigation was tainted by bias, and that he deserved …
The appellants, Heera Lal and Moti Lal, appealed against an order dated 13‑January‑1987 of the IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Banda, which forfeited their surety bonds and imposed a penalty of Rs.5,000 each under Section 446 of the Criminal Procedure Code. During the pendency of the appeal, the …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Code of Criminal Procedure seeking to quash the charge sheet, cognizance order and subsequent proceedings under the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, in Special Case No. 77 of 2015. The basis of the …
The appellants were convicted by a Fast Track Court for kidnapping a minor under Section 363 IPC and sentenced to five years' imprisonment and a fine. On appeal, the High Court examined the prosecution's evidence, which relied mainly on the testimony of the complainant's wife and an informant who …
The appellants Mahendra, Bankey and Pappu (Mahipal) were convicted for the murder of Fateh Singh under IPC sections 302 and 34 and sentenced to life imprisonment. The prosecution case relied on two eye‑witnesses, the son and brother of the deceased, and forensic evidence. The appellants challenged …
The petitioners filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings against five members of the husband’s family in a case filed under Section 498A IPC, Section 323 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The FIR and charge sheet alleged only …
The applicant, Smt. Aastha Sharma, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (State Vs Prashant Kaushik and others) from the ACJM Court‑5 in Ghaziabad to the District Court in Meerut and to stay the proceedings. The application was …
The appellant, Sunil Agrahari, appealed to the Allahabad High Court under Section 14‑A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, seeking bail in a case involving offences under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 452 of the IPC and related provisions of the SC/ST …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash two criminal cases (Nos. 8152 of 2018 and 8601 of 2020) pending before the Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Muzaffarnagar, which arose from a crime reported under IPC sections 498A, 323, 504, 506 …
The applicants, Preeti Soni and another, sought quashing of a charge‑sheet dated 2‑April‑2025 and related proceedings under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3) of the B.N.S. and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice Act, alleging that the dispute had been settled by compromise on 7‑Oct‑2025. The …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Mohd Yunus under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti‑Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986. The applicant claimed false implication and …
Sunil Yadav constructed an eight‑foot wall on government land (Gata Nos. 60 and 642) in Baruasagar, Jhansi, leading to an FIR for offences under Section 447 IPC and Section 3 of the Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984. He filed an application under Section 528 of the BNSS seeking to …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Neha Mishra under Section 482 CrPC in a murder case (Crime No. 461 of 2025). The petitioner argued that she was falsely implicated, the FIR was lodged nine days after the incident, she has no criminal record, and she is a …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Sarita alias Guddal alias Guddi Devi, who was implicated in a case under Sections 3, 4, 5 and 6 of the Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act, 1956. The applicant argued that she was not named …
The applicant, Sonu Raidas, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 7‑Feb‑2017 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Railway Prayagraj, in connection with a trial under Section 153 of the Railway Act (Case No. …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Prince Kumar Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with FIR No. 0022 of 2026 alleging assault on a first informant. The applicant claimed innocence, asserted that no specific role was assigned to him, …
The Allahabad High Court considered an application under Section 528 of the B.N.S.S. seeking to quash a charge‑sheet and a cognizance/summoning order dated 04.04.2022 in a case involving Sections 498‑A, 323, 506 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act. The applicants contended that they were falsely …
The applicant filed an application under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant and related proceedings issued in criminal case No. 1476 of 2010. The applicant contended that he was on bail when the warrant was issued and that no summons or …
The Allahabad High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a case under Sections 2 and 3 of the Gangster Act. The applicants, already on regular bail in a related gang‑related case, claimed innocence and asserted …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application filed by Divyanshu Singh under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in a case registered under IPC sections 191(2), 352, 351(3) and 109. The applicant asserted that he was falsely implicated, that no specific role was …
The petitioner Ritu Rai filed a criminal revision challenging the Family Court's order dated 17‑01‑2024 that dismissed her application for maintenance under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The High Court held that the Family Court had not applied its mind, had placed the burden of proof …
The High Court of Allahabad considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Ranjeet Kumar under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Crime No. 0337 of 2025. The applicant claimed innocence, stating that his name surfaced only in the confessional statement of …
The High Court of Allahabad entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Nirdosh Kumar, who was implicated in a case involving offences under Sections 420, 467, 468, 406, 342 and 120‑B IPC. The applicant claimed innocence and pointed out that co‑accused Sunil …
The applicant, Suraj Chourasiya, filed a Cr.P.C. Section 482 application seeking to quash the criminal complaint (case 117 of 2018) filed under IPC sections 363, 366, 376 and POCSO Act sections 3/4, on the ground that the parties had reached an out‑of‑court compromise which was verified by the …
The applicant Vishal, the younger brother‑in‑law of the informant, was implicated in a criminal case (Crime No. 370 of 2025) alleging outraging the modesty of the informant's daughter, among other offences. He filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal …
The Allahabad High Court entertained an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the CrPC filed by Sarfaraz Ahmad and two others, who were accused of offences under Sections 420 and 120B IPC. The applicants claimed innocence, asserted that a co‑accused had already received interim …
The applicants Shivam Yadav, Ajeet Yadav and Jagdish Yadav filed an application under Section 528 of the Uttar Pradesh Police Act seeking to quash the charge‑sheet and cognizance order in Case No. 502 of 2025, alleging that they were falsely implicated and that the FIR contained no specific …
Petitioner Gaurav Goyal filed a writ petition seeking quashal of an FIR dated 31‑01‑2026 under sections 352 and 109(1) of the BNS, alleging that the dispute with the informant Harsh Garg had been amicably settled by a written settlement deed dated 19‑02‑2026. Both the State’s A.G. and the …
The applicant, Neeraj Kumar, filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a non‑bailable warrant dated 06‑09‑2025 issued by the Special Judge (Gangster Act) in a case under the Gangster Act. The warrant was issued because the applicant failed to appear on …
The applicants, Kaisar and Shahmat, were charged in a 2019 case under several IPC offences including rioting, assault and attempt to murder. They filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, asserting innocence and willingness to cooperate with the …
Manish and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition seeking quashment of an FIR dated 27‑01‑2026 under IPC sections 115(2), 352, 351(2) and 324(2). The petitioners claimed that the parties had amicably settled the dispute and executed a compromise affidavit on 03‑02‑2026, arguing that …
Petitioners Tulsi Pathak and two others filed a criminal miscellaneous writ petition in the Allahabad High Court seeking quash of an FIR dated 21-02-2026, registered under sections 61(2) and 87 BNS, alleging that the alleged victim’s modesty was forcibly removed and no consent was given. The State, …
The High Court considered an anticipatory bail application filed by Nawab Ansari (also known as Guddu Warsi and Fitwell Tailor) in a case involving alleged offences under Sections 411, 413, 414, 420, 467 and 468 of the IPC and Sections 41 and 102 of the CrPC. The applicant claimed innocence, stating …
The applicants Basruddin and Md. Sadiq filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with a FIR alleging forgery of documents in a civil suit. They claimed innocence, cited the grant of anticipatory bail to co‑accused Yusuf and Shakeela, and …
The applicants, Manju Devi and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief. The counsel for the applicants informed the court that the parties had reached a settlement and had filed a fresh petition/application. Consequently, the court was asked to …
The applicant, Taufeeq, sought anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code in connection with Crime No. 283 of 2025, which involved charges under several sections of the B.N.S. He asserted his innocence and relied on an interim protection order dated 09‑09‑2025. The State …
Smt. Mamta Dagar filed an application under Section 528 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking recall of a criminal proceeding. The High Court heard the learned Additional Government Advocate for the State, issued a notice to the applicant, and directed that the matter be listed for further hearing …
The applicants, Pooja Goswami and another, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the charge sheet dated 5 September 2024, the summons and cognizance order dated 7 October 2024, and the entire criminal proceedings (Criminal Case No.14530 of 2024) …
The applicant, Akhatari Begam, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a domestic violence case (case No. 415 of 2019) from the Judicial Magistrate Court in Jalaun to another district court and also requested a stay of proceedings. No counsel …
The applicants filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash the criminal proceedings (Case No. 2396 of 2016) arising from an FIR that alleged dowry demand and harassment in a matrimonial dispute. The FIR named the husband (applicant No.1) and five of his …
The appellant Mahesh alias Munna Yadav was convicted for murder and offences under the Arms Act arising from a land‑dispute‑related shooting that killed Bhola Yadav and Vinod Yadav. The prosecution relied on the informant’s statement, medical post‑mortem reports, forensic ballistics linking the …
The applicants and the State entered into an amicable settlement regarding offences under Sections 147, 452, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC arising from Crime No. 4931 of 2017. They filed a compromise application before the trial court, which was verified and reported to the High Court. Relying on …
This is an application under Section 482 filed before the Allahabad High Court by Raj Kumar Nagar against the State of U.P. and another. The application was registered as Application U/S 482 No. 40887 of 2014 and was heard by Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma, J. The order states that the present …
The applicant, Rashid Anwar, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (S.T. No. 226 of 2020) to another Sessions Division and to stay the proceedings. No counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the application, and …
The applicants Jagdeesh Prasad and Raj Kumar Nagar sought to quash a revision order dated 30‑08‑2014 passed by the Additional Session Judge (Special Judge, SC/ST Act) which had set aside a magistrate's order rejecting a protest by the informant. The informant had alleged that the applicants forged …
Smt Neelam filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (State vs Indrapal & others) from Hasanpur, Amroha to Moradabad. The application required service of notice on opposite parties, but the court’s office report indicated that no …
Ankita Singh filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Cr.No. 17114 of 2023) from the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ghazipur to Ballia, alleging that staying in Ghazipur would cause her irreparable loss. The application listed several …
The applicants filed an application under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. seeking quash of a charge sheet and stay of proceedings in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 498A, 323, 307, 504, 506, 354A, 354B IPC and the D.P. Act. The parties had amicably settled the dispute and filed a …
The applicant, Smt. Tanmayee Raghuvanshi, filed a transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a criminal case (Case No. 172/2023) from the District and Sessions Judge, Jaunpur to the District and Sessions Judge, Varanasi, alleging potential irreparable loss …
The applicant filed an application under Section 483 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the application had become infructuous. The court considered the submission and found no merit in proceeding further. Consequently, the court dismissed the …
The High Court examined an appeal against a Sessions Court conviction of Irfan, Faeem and Saleem for murder (Sec. 302 IPC) and abetment (Sec. 120B IPC) based on a FIR lodged 49 hours after the incident. The prosecution alleged the accused deliberately ran over the deceased with a tractor, supported …
The revisionist, Nitin Bansal, appealed the Additional Principal Judge’s order under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. that required him to pay Rs 6,000 per month to his wife and Rs 4,000 to his minor daughter. He argued that he was unemployed, had lost his investment, and that the amount was excessive …
Smt. Pinki Devi filed a criminal miscellaneous transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a case involving offences under Sections 498‑A, 323, 504 IPC and the Dowry Prohibition Act from the Judicial Magistrate, Bhoganipur, Kanpur Dehat to another district, …
The applicant, Smt. Pinki Devi, filed a criminal transfer application under Section 407 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a domestic violence case (Case No. 121 of 2020) from the Judicial Magistrate Court, Bhoganipur, Kanpur Dehat to the District Court, Fatehpur, invoking Section 12 of …
Surendra Ray filed a transfer application under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to move a family court case (No. 1022 of 2021) from Varanasi to the District Court, Ghazipur. The High Court directed the applicant to deposit Rs. 25,000 in the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, but …
The applicants, Prashanter Dhama and others, filed a petition under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal case (Criminal Case No.33361 of 2023) pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aligarh, which involved offences under IPC sections 498‑A, 323, 504, 506, 354‑Ka and D.P. Act …
The husband, Mayank Saxena, appealed a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs.15,000 per month as maintenance to his wife, Sweta Saxena, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. The parties mediated at the High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre and entered into a settlement agreement on …
Akash filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a Family Court order dated 4 May 2024 that dismissed his maintenance application, noting the matter was scheduled for final judgment on 18 May 2024. The High Court scheduled the case for a fresh hearing on …
The applicant filed a petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning and cognizance order dated 12‑12‑2023 issued by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kairana, in a case under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code. The applicant contended that …
The applicant, Aniruddacharya Chela Bhagwan Das, filed an anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code before the Allahabad High Court. During the hearing, counsel for the applicant informed the court that the applicant had already been granted bail by the Sessions …
The revisionist, Vikesh Shahi, challenged a Family Court order granting Rs.3,500 per month to his wife and Rs.2,500 per month to his son as maintenance under Section 125 CrPC, alleging that the total amount was excessive and that he was mentally unstable and unemployed. The opposite parties …
The revisionist, Smt. Jyoti Singh, filed a revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging the dismissal of her maintenance application by the Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Firozabad. She contended that the trial court erred by not considering her unemployment …
The applicant, Varun Kumar Mishra, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking relief against the State of Uttar Pradesh and eight other respondents. The matter was listed before the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, but the applicant's counsel failed to appear …
The petitioner, Smt. Manju Upadhyay, filed a Section 482 CrPC application to set aside an order dated 04‑07‑2024 of the Additional Sessions Judge (Special Judge under the POCSO Act) which had treated her Section 156(3) CrPC application for FIR registration as a complaint. She alleged that her three …
The husband, Mohit Kumar Wadhwa, filed a criminal revision under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code challenging a Family Court order that directed him to pay Rs 20,000 per month to his wife and later Rs 25,000 per month. He contended that his actual earnings as a labourer in his father's …
The applicant, Jameel Khan, filed an application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to quash a summoning order dated 07.05.2024 and the related criminal complaint (Case No. 1108 of 2023) involving offences under Sections 406, 452, 323, 504 and 506 IPC. The matter was referred …
The revisionist, a labourer, challenged the Family Court’s order directing him to pay Rs 4,000 per month to his wife and Rs 1,000 to a third party under Section 125 Cr.P.C., claiming the amount was excessive given his modest earnings. The State opposed, arguing the award was reasonable in light of …
The revisionist Naresh Verma challenged a Family Court order directing him to pay Rs 10,000 per month as maintenance to his wife under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. He claimed his income was only Rs 10,000 per month from work in a jewellery shop that he does not own, arguing the amount …
The revisionist Gaurav challenged a Family Court order that awarded Rs 3,000 per month as maintenance to his wife and son, arguing the amount was excessive given his unemployment and pending criminal cases. The State contended that the award was proportionate to the revisionist's income potential. …
The applicant, Sameer Usmani, was charged under Sections 85, 80(2) of the CrPC, Section 3/4 of the D.P. Act and Section 302 IPC for allegedly murdering his wife after demanding a Mercedes car. The applicant contended that the death was accidental, citing the post‑mortem, vehicle examination, …
The applicant Rohit Upadhyay filed an application under Section 482 of the CrPC seeking to quash the criminal trial (Case No. 68572 of 2024) arising from an FIR alleging repeated rape, blackmail with indecent videos, and exploitation under the guise of exorcism. The victim, a married woman, reported …
The applicants filed an application under Section 528 seeking to quash a supplementary chargesheet dated 05‑11‑2024 and the cognizance order dated 12‑08‑2025 in Criminal Case No. 5201 of 2023. The charges were originally framed against co‑accused after an FIR, but the Superintendent of Police …
