Created byFuzzy Cloud

Legislation

Customs Tariff (Identification, Assessment and Collection of Anti‑dumping Duty on Dumped Articles and for Determination of Injury) Rules, 1995

6 Supreme Court judgments cite this Act.

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, BANGALOREversusM/S. G. M. EXPORTS & OTHERS

2015 INSC 69323 September 2015Disposed off

The Supreme Court examined whether a final anti‑dumping duty could be levied for the period between the expiry of a provisional duty and the issuance of a final duty notification. The Court held that Rule 20(2)(a) of the Anti‑Dumping Rules must be read in harmony with Rules 13 and 21 and with WTO Agreement Article 10.2

COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, PUNEversusM/S BALLARPUR INDUSTRIES LTD.

2021 INSC 51521 September 2021Disposed off

The case concerned import of Styrene‑Butadiene Rubber (SBR) of the 1900 series, which the importer M/s Ballarpur Industries Ltd. declared as ‘Lutex‑701’ and ‘Lutex‑780’ in its Bills of Entry. The Commissioner of Customs issued show‑cause notices alleging mis‑declaration and demanding confiscation, anti‑dumping duty, in

UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERversusM/S. KUMHO PETROCHEMICALS COMPANY LIMITED AND ANOTHER

2017 INSC 4769 June 2017Dismissed

The case concerned the levy of anti‑dumping duty on imports of Acrylonitrile‑Butadiene‑Rubber (NBR) from Korea. The original notification imposing the duty was extended by a five‑year notification dated 02‑01‑2009, which expired on 01‑01‑2014. A third sunset‑review was initiated on 31‑12‑2013, and the Government issued

AUTOMOTIVE TYRE MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATIONversusTHE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY & ORS.

2011 INSC 227 January 2011Case Partly allowed

The Automotive Tyre Manufacturers Association (ATMA) and its members imported Nylon Tyre Cord Fabric and sought relief from an anti‑dumping duty imposed on imports from China under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The Designated Authority (DA) investigated, issued provisional duty, and later, after a change of officer, re

M/S. JASWAL NECO LTD.versusCOMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, VISAKHAPATNAM

2015 INSC 5424 August 2015Appeal(s) allowed

M/s. Jaswal Neco Ltd., a pig‑iron manufacturer, imported low‑ash metallurgical coke between June and August 1998 under export‑obligation exemptions. It failed to fulfill the export condition and was assessed a demand of Rs 7.21 crore comprising basic customs duty, special customs duty, special additional duty, and anti

Search Indian case law

Ask in plain English, not just keywords. 25,000 AI words free, no card.

Search by issue, statute, judge or citationSign in to search